View Single Post
Old 03-16-2008, 07:51 AM   #10 (permalink)
DanS.
Administrator
 
DanS.'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,244
My Mood:
Thanks: 97
Thanked 172 Times in 127 Posts
DanS. is a spectacular PG memberDanS. is a spectacular PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insipid View Post
Yes, it is cheaper. We ALL pay for health care eventually because we all get sick eventually. The problem is how much it will cost when we get sick. If we have health care and get treated in the early stages, the treatment is relatively cheap. If we have to wait to go to an emergency room it's expensive.

We're ALL paying for universal health care now. We pay more for health care as a percentage of our GDP than any industrialized county. And yet we have less health care. This is largely because we do not have universal health care.
So universal by force is the solution...

No...the whole premise of making it cheaper is based on the idea that 20-somethings who are not likely to get sick will pay more into the system than they use. That is not cheaper for them. Which means it is not cheaper for All...just some.
DanS. is online now   Top Reply With Quote