Quote:
Originally Posted by itsmeeeeeee
just in case you posted that for obama supporters, here - let's clarify WHICH campaign HE directed it at, and which candidate and surrogates have been doing it - the clinton campaign. you haven't heard a fraction of the kind of shit HER campaign is spewing from obama's campaign. so let's be CRYSTAL clear about that.
there is NO question that the clinton campaign has engaged in NOTHING BUT a VICIOUS smear and fear against obama, and that it's clearly taking it's toll in the polls - HOPEFULLY - just for now. if hillary's fatally damaged obama, there will be HELL to pay, so she better start praying to god that it's NOT already too late!
at the same time she's STILL smearing him, yesterday clinton stated that she would "shout to the mountains campaigning for the party's nominee". (big fucking whoop - after what she's done!) if that isn't a signal that she KNOWS she's going down, and that she's been "getting" the message that she BETTER fix this damage that she created, i don't know what IS!
she's done such a fantastic job smearing our nominee, in her self-absorbed and destructive excuse for a campaign that one can't help but wonder how she thinks she's going to just suddenly turn her supporters around.
fucking bitch. obama can't say it, but i sure as hell will!
|
I "directed" it at anyone who might find it interesting.
I found it interesting because I believe he is saying it is not necessary to vitriolically hate one candidate (for whatever reason) in order to support another. Of course there is nothing stopping anyone from hating or criticizing or anything else, it is just not a prerequisite, and some of us prefer not to engage in it.
Again, that is not to say
you or anyone else so moved should not engage in it, only that others find it not only unnecessary, but counterproductive. If Ms. Clinton is in fact the toast she appears to be, then this will take care of itself, and if she has burned the bridges of which you speak she will be unable to cross them again. The party need not be destroyed, the cause need not be lost. It is up to the voters to decide, ultimately and hopefully, if enough of them come out and prevent another close election, close enough to steal.
If they are inclined to be swayed by distractions and irrelevancies they will be swayed regardless of who is presenting them, if they are ready to truly change the direction of not only our politics but our country and perhaps even the world, they will act accordingly. But a majority of all voters have to make this decision, not just camps of individual candidates. Is a majority mature and adult enough to see past political games as usual? They were not in 1988, they were in 1992, they were not in 2000 or 2004. They are certainly due this time.