Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle
Even if that were correct, and we add the "uncommitted" votes to Obama's total, it's still showing the superdelegates to be disproportionate.
Obama has 425 superdelegates to Clinton's 275. How does 48% of the vote amount to 60% of the superdelegates? He should have more like 345 according to your totals.
The superdelegates are not representing the will of the people. They are subverting the democratic process to get their chosen candidate on the ballot.
Exactly like you were all afraid of. But it's OK with all of you because all that matters is that your candidate is winning.
Obama's "change" and "new kind of politics" is the same old Chicago Democrat political machine - lie, cheat, steal, strongarm, etc.
|
2118 was the threshold to win the nomination. After he clinched he picked up a flood of supers in the last 48 hours.
Why am I explaining this to you? Don't you have your second cousin to take to her High School prom.
__________________
“I truly believe that at this point in America’s history we need a president who will not just continue ... basically the policies we have followed in recent years. We need a president with transformational qualities.”
"For that reason, I will be voting for Barack Obama.”
- Former Secretary of State Colin Powell
“You can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska.”
Gov Palin explaining her national security credentials.
|