Originally Posted by itsmeeeeeee

what's different is MOST losing opponents don't go this far in debt. and according to the articles i've read, she isn't asking for help to pay back any of her own personal loans to her campaign (evidently they are just willing to write that off) but rather the rest of the debt, which is still quite considerable - an unprecedented amount.

it was the height of stupidity of her to go THAT far in debt considering it was so obvious she couldn't win for SO long.