Quote:
Originally Posted by eagleclaw
Not quite Tit Pus, your answer have to be vetted before you are allowed to post them.
And where do you get all the time to research and think about this?
|
LOL, it doesn't take that much time to research most of this stuff. It's usually easy to debunk most of it (just like that cut and crap piece you did about the Payne Stewart Learjet intercept) because you are starting off knowing that most of it is garbage and full of lies and distortions. From there finding the truth and evidence to support it is typically quite simple.
Quote:
|
One very possible scenario is that you are getting paid for it.
|
More evidence of how you are out of touch with reality.
Quote:
|
Even though there are only a few that post here on this subject the threads themselves are read by thousands of visitors to this site. so if they just happen to stumble upon this particular subject it wouldn't look too good for the home team to read all the evidence that shoots down the "official story" without any ridicule or disinformation from the so-called "debunglers".
|
Home team, LOL! This is the conspiracy forum, you're on the home team! I on the other hand am not an anyone's team.
Quote:
|
And here is your answer, I hope you like it. This is why it took so long.
|
Another cut and crap post took that long?
Hold on, it doesn't even start to answer most of my questions that I posted!
You posted this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by eagleclaw
Especially when cell phones were not a reliable means of making phone calls from 40,000 feet up in the air.
|
I then asked you:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Titanium Cat
Which calls were made from a cellphone 40,000 feet up in the air?
|
Your response here doesn't address that at all. Why not? It's a fairly simple question and your statement implied that cell phone calls were made from high altitude.
And I asked you this:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Titanium Cat
Renee May called and talked to her mother from Flight 77. Is her mother in on the conspiracy that killed her daughter?
|
Your response doesn't even mention Renee May! What about the fact that she called and talked to her mother?
And this is what your previous post (a cut and paste from David Ray Griffin) stated:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by eagleclaw
A 9/11 researcher, knowing that AA Flight 77 was a Boeing 757, noticed that AA’s website indicated that its 757s do not have passenger-seat phones.
|
Now your new cut and paste job states:
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by eagleclaw
Though the American Airlines Boeing 757 is fitted with individual telephones at each seat position, they are not of the variety where you can simply pick up the handset and ask for an operator. On many aircraft you can talk from one seat to another in the aircraft free of charge, but if you wish to access the outside world you must first swipe your credit card through the telephone. By Ted Olson’s own admission, Barbara did not have a credit card with her.
It gets worse. On American Airlines there is a telephone "setup" charge of US$2.50 which can only be paid by credit card, then a US$2.50 (sometimes US$5.00) charge per minute of speech thereafter. The setup charge is the crucial element. Without paying it in advance by swiping your credit card you cannot access the external telephone network. Under these circumstances the passengers’ seat phone on a Boeing 757 is a much use as a plastic toy.
|
So you admit that your previous post was in error and that David Ray Griffin was presenting false information when he stated that AA 757's did not have passenger seat phones! Very good. Speaking of which, what is your source for this cut and paste job?
And I posted this about Griffin's stuff that you cut and pasted (it's the quoted text starting with "FBI included a report ..."):
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Titanim Cat
Griffin is blantantly lying about the second part:
"FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an “unconnected call,” which (of course) lasted “0 seconds.”9 According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone."
The FBI did not make such a conclusion. There were four "connected calls to unknown numbers" which the FBI concluded were between Barbara Olson and her husband's office.
|
Once again your response doesn't address this point! Why not?
How is it that it takes you almost 4 weeks to respond to my posts about the phone calls and you don't even address the questions I asked or the points that I raised.
Why? Because obviously you can't actually think and all you do is cut & paste.
Please respond to the questions and the points that I made and without another meandering cut & paste job.