Quote:
Originally Posted by sunflower
He's keeping mum about it - trying to keep his chance of its publishing high, and away from too much publicity. I'm sure he'll tell everyone interested once it's passed review. From my understanding, review can sometimes take years.
|
Well Sunflower, I'll agree that if he can adquately pass peer review in a
real scientific journal, I'll start taking his work more seriously.
Right now I have numerous peer review papers on the collapses, the nist report, fema, Columbia seismologists, Purdue University, etc... that all support the collapse theory.
I have no scientifically published work supporting the controlled demoloition whatsoever.
It's why I think this entire debate is currently a joke.