View Single Post
Old 11-26-2007, 01:36 PM   #104 (permalink)
gorillamom
Beyond Liberal
Points: 6,392, Level: 52 Points: 6,392, Level: 52 Points: 6,392, Level: 52
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
gorillamom's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: The Great Pacific Northwest
Posts: 2,161
My Mood:
Thanks: 47
Thanked 13 Times in 7 Posts
gorillamom is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunflower View Post
I understand it completely. I'm not sure you understand what I'm saying, tho.

You want scientific theory regarding CD - you've posted this in the 9/1 thread. Therefore, you're talking about the Twin Towers. Am I right thus far?

I'm also not trying to hijack it...but if you're looking for science by the way of the Twin Towers' demolitions, it is axiomatic that the official story of how they fell, i.e., FEMA, NIST, Silverstein-Weidlinger, Popular Mechanics - take your pick - would be used as your argument against that scientific theory of CD.

Why don't you apply your own rules to yourself? And BTW, if you haven't already noticed, there are a plethora of threads in this very topic regarding 9/11, theory, scientific data, etc., on CD.
I think what he is asking for is scientific proof that building 7 and the towers were wired. So far there is no evidence or anyone coming forward to provide truth to this "theory". That's all anyone has asked for, not just youtube or idiot sites. Evidence is what is needed to prove it was a CD operation.
__________________

The Clock of life is wound but once,
And no man has the power,
To tell just when the hands will stop
On what day or what hour.
Now is the only time we have,
So live it with a will,
Don't wait until tomorrow,
The hands may then be still.
gorillamom is offline   Top Reply With Quote