dadakarma

Slowhand, the chasm between you and I is increasing, despite your assertion of skepticism regarding the Pentagon, your suspicion of a possible 'LIHOP' scenario and your overall distrust of the Bush administration. You characterize other skeptics who've embraced and believe the towers were demolished as crazy and having such ridiculous ideas, basing that primarily because of the lack of explosion noise, so you throw the baby out with the bathwater - a demo is now unfathomable to you because of who is proposing the idea ('crazy truthers'). None of the skeptics here can produce irrefutable proof of what happened. The only entity with the authority and resources who could have proven what happened at the towers and the Pentagon (along with being forthcoming in testimony, documentation, communiques, etc.) is the Bush administration, and instead they've thwarted any thorough investigation with their deliberate destruction of key pieces of evidence. If the White House didn't have something to hide, surely they'd produce, at a minimum, substantial footage/documentation/etc. of what happened at the Pentagon. That they're now being requested to be forthcoming with ALL information is the result of six years of secrecy and lies. Surely SOME footage and information volunteered by the Bush administration would have laid the big mystery to rest a long time ago.

Cooperation by the Bush administration with a thorough investigation (neither cooperation NOR a thorough investigation has transpired to this day) is the only means of finding out what really happened. Until then, I do not rule out a number of plausible alternative scenarios. The lack of closure is frustrating, but I'm unwilling to embrace Bush's official version in exchange for peace of mind - not because I despise him (which I do), but because their version lacks credibility, due to all of the missing evidence, their refusal to cooperate, the contradictions in witness accounts, and their shitty track record.