Quote:
Originally Posted by metaldeth_shredder
National Championship? did you say National Championship???? PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEZE 
your kidding right?
the ONLY thing this game represents is Bias and Political University politics at its MOST corrupt.
and who is going to say whichever team that wins is the National Champion?
the so called "experts"? 
the same "experts" who have proven throughout the season that they don't know what the HELL they are TALKING ABOUT.
the BCS is BS,
as I referenced in this previous thread.
The BCS is BS!!! |
I agree it was muddled as to who was to play in this game.
So who is more deserving to play in it?
W. Virg., who was a shoe in and only had to beat Pitt, who was 4 -7 ? Good team, but I don't think so.
Kansas, who didn't even play in in their conference championship game? Good team, but I don't think so.
Missouri, who lost their conference championship game? Good team, but I don't think so.
A case could be made for Oklahoma, but they proved they didn't belong there losing the Fiesta Bowl.
A case could be made for USC, who lost two games in a weaker conference than the SEC and doesn't have to play a conference championship game.
This BCS championship game will not settle which team is "the best" this year, but which team wins the championship game who got into this game by the same rules all the other teams abide by.
So what team is more deserving to be in this game than the two who are there?