View Single Post
Old 01-07-2008, 11:46 PM   #7 (permalink)
metaldeth_shredder
Member
Points: 1,064, Level: 17 Points: 1,064, Level: 17 Points: 1,064, Level: 17
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 37
My Mood:
Thanks: 6
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
metaldeth_shredder is a normal PG member
quote by aloysious
Quote:
This BCS championship game will not settle which team is "the best" this year, but which team wins the championship game who got into this game by the same rules all the other teams abide by.
first off all the other teams don't "abide" by the same rules, (I wish that it was a "level playing field") unfortunately it is not

only certain university teams get the opportunity,
and as this season proved the "experts" who are VERY BIASED, either will not be objective or will be so biased that they influence polls to their advantage,

also the majority of times these so called "experts" don't know what is going to happen anyway

as I stated from the start:
it's not a level playing field,

unfair#1

only certain university teams get the opportunity(almost always the larger most well known universities)

unfair#2

smaller schools don't get the opportunity to have big time players recruitment opportunities,

unfair#3

smaller schools have a budget not even 1/10th of what other big time successful football schools allow to be allocated

unfair#4

but besides that there is significant bias and corruption from these so called "experts"

quote by aloysious
Quote:
So what team is more deserving to be in this game than the two who are there?
impossible question to answer with the current system
it is FAR TO SUBJECTIVE(two teams immediately come to my mind as contenders and are playing VERY WELL right now besides LSU, those are USC, and Georgia)

we won't know unless some playoff system is instituted,

sounds like a simple enough solution, and it really is a simple solution regardless of what others try to say

you see the problem is Bigger Universities don't want it to be fair,

they are interested in one thing and one thing only:
MONEY

bowl games are BIG money
and the universities and conferences that right now currently get that money(SEC,Big10, etc) are willing to do almost anything to INSURE that each year they get that money on a yearly basis.


it's biased, corrupt, political university politics

so who does deserve it? lets be objective

its a simple solution,

let the teams decide a champion on the field, let them compete to decide a National Champion,

look at what happened last year and this year, check out this thread
http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaaf/news?s...yhoo&type=lgns

now how can ANYONE say the BCS is not BS?

P.S.
(do not misunderstand the INTENT of the link I posted, the point is not to promote BOISE STATE it is to demonstrate the system is BS and that the teams need to compete on the field to decide a National Champion, same as they do in March Madness, and pretty much every other college NCAA sports competition)

Quote:
Writers and coaches with their opinions, along with a bunch of computers with their statistics, should not be deciding something that only can be decided on the field.

That's exactly where Boise State proved the pro-playoff crowd's point – beyond a reasonable doubt, with absolutely irrefutable evidence.

No machine and no person can see into the hearts of the young men who play college football or into the minds and guts of the men who coach them. If they could have on Jan. 1, 2007, everyone, instead of no one, would have picked the Boise State Broncos to beat Goliath.

Wouldn't it be great to see if they could do it again, with even higher stakes?

Last edited by metaldeth_shredder; 01-07-2008 at 11:51 PM.
metaldeth_shredder is offline   Top Reply With Quote