PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Off Beat > Arts & Entertainment
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
View Poll Results: Should MP3 file sharing be illegal?
Yes 4 30.77%
No 9 69.23%
Voters: 13. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-03-2008, 07:34 PM   #31 (permalink)
Assimilated Doppleganger
Points: 7,374, Level: 57 Points: 7,374, Level: 57 Points: 7,374, Level: 57
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%
 
Alinea's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: ♥ The Bantering Resurgence ♥
Posts: 2,103
Thanks: 137
Thanked 81 Times in 69 Posts
Alinea is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ouroboros View Post
I just wanted to be nerdy for a change.
I just wanted some of us to put ourselves in the shoes of the musicians. The service sector of the economy is large, so most of us probably fall into it. Others actually create products everyday. Either way, if the economy says people are paid for these things (service and products), then pay...or come up with another (fair and equitable) system.
__________________
♥ Aaron Lewis ♥

Alinea is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 10:23 PM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 5,561, Level: 48 Points: 5,561, Level: 48 Points: 5,561, Level: 48
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,872
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
Ouroboros is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlineaHeart View Post
I just wanted some of us to put ourselves in the shoes of the musicians. The service sector of the economy is large, so most of us probably fall into it. Others actually create products everyday. Either way, if the economy says people are paid for these things (service and products), then pay...or come up with another (fair and equitable) system.
Actually, the music biz stradles both sectors. From my perspective, it's a service industry. People come to me to create and market their products, and I assist them in doing so.

Then, there's all the equipment it takes to produce and preform the music. And let's not forget all of the hardware/software we need to update yearly just to stay in-the-game.

Folks, when you buy a CD, read the liner notes. Those people get paid. Good music costs big money.
Ouroboros is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2008, 11:50 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 2,932, Level: 33 Points: 2,932, Level: 33 Points: 2,932, Level: 33
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
GurnBlanston's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 598
My Mood:
Thanks: 33
Thanked 31 Times in 21 Posts
GurnBlanston is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kana View Post
Because beer is consumable. If I buy a pint of beer and share half of it with my friend, then I only get to drink half a pint of beer, and my friend only gets half a pint of beer. If I want to drink a full pint and my friend wants to drink a full pint, one of us has to buy another beer.

Music is not consumable, so the rules are a bit different. If you lend your friend one of your CDs to listen to for a while, that's legal. But when you make a copy for your friend, that's not. In effect, you drank two pints of beer, but only paid for one.
I disagree. To make two pints, you need enough to make two pints and therefore your overhead goes up. Since digital music exists as bits on some silicon, it did not require the manufacturing of a medium. Therefore no one is out any money. The question is, would the person who got a copy spent money if he had to. It's an honor based question but covers the dichotomy much better than the "two pint" explanation.
Truth is, artists don't make crap off of record sales. Artists like Paul McCartney found that they could make more if they turned to online distribution. The only hold the music ind has over artists is distribution. Nowadays, artists have a way around that and I support it 100%. In some cases, they lease the permission to sell to retailers (inDVD's case, many supermarkets, with music the big one is Starbucks) and let the retailer assume the responsibility to manufacture the medium (which is getting dirt cheap today). Supermarkets print and copy their own DVD for sale and Starbucks distributes and online artists are starting to see favor with todays tech savy consumer. Finding the rewards being a loyal fan base. I think the record ind sees this and is scared shitless. Read up on just how scary the DRM software is getting. It's ridiculous.
Look, I'm not trying to rip off artists, I'm a musician, I understand. But I won't support the current system that rapes me and gives pitence to the bands. And if it takes acts of digital civil disobedience, so be it.
GurnBlanston is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com General political and social discussion