metaldeth_shredder

Ha ha Titaniumcat, are you serious?

The most widely used definition of "weapons of mass destruction" are "nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons."

that's what the NCIS report states coalition forces found,

it doesn't matter that YOU think what coalition forces found is not WMD's(you have no credibility)

it only matters what the NCIS actually found:

"Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

so which part of that do you not understand?

Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq

report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit

Thursday, June 22, 2006

MarkMiller

That is a rather short report.....and does not mention any weapons of mass destruction......just munitions some filled and some emptied and is not supporting your assertions.

MarkMiller

You understand that if it's a WMD....it would be refered to as a WMD.

Malkavian

Dude, what part of degraded don't you understand? Those 'WMDs' are about as dangerous as a brick. Sure, you can bash people's heads with them, but that's all they are good for.

__________________
Woof!

Titanium Cat

Yes I am, are you? The only people who took Santorum's claims seriously were right wing blowhard mouthpieces like Limbaugh and Hannity. Hannity couldn't understand why the Whitehouse wasn't paying any attention to the story. Maybe metaldeth shredder can explain to us why the one person in the world who had more to gain than anyone else from WMDs being found in Iraq, George W. Bush, didn't claim that these old chemical munitions were WMDs.

Except what was found were no longer functioning weapons.

No it doesn't say that, what it says is that they found the degraded remains of old chemical munitions.

In that case then you have negative credibility.

LOL, as Malk said, which part of degraded don't you understand? That urn on the fireplace with grampa's ashes in it, well you can call it grampa but it isn't really him.

That wasn't the name of the report, that's the name some moron reporter (probably from Fox) gave to the Santorum story. The actual declassified report name was something like "Iraqi Chemical Munitions".

Lawmakers Cite Weapons Found in Iraq - washingtonpost.com

[snip] Report of Hoekstra's and Santorum's claim [/snip]

"The U.S. military announced in 2004 in Iraq that several crates of the old shells had been uncovered and that they contained a blister agent that was no longer active. Neither the military nor the White House nor the CIA considered the shells to be evidence of what was alleged by the Bush administration to be a current Iraqi program to make chemical, biological and nuclear weapons.

Last night, intelligence officials reaffirmed that the shells were old and were not the suspected weapons of mass destruction sought in Iraq after the 2003 invasion."

Titanium Cat

Former weapons inspector David Kay commented on the degraded chemicals in the munitions:

Kay said, the decades-old sarin nerve gas was probably no more dangerous than household pesticides -- and far more likely to degrade at room temperature. "In terms of toxicity, sir," Kay told [Rep. Curt] Weldon [R-PA] at one point, "I suspect in your house, and I know in my house, I have things that are more toxic than sarin produced from 1984 to 1988."

metaldeth_shredder

it doesn't matter that YOU think what coalition forces found is not WMD's(you have no credibility)

The most widely used definition of "weapons of mass destruction" are "nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons."

that's what the NCIS report states coalition forces found,

it only matters what the NCIS actually found:

"Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

so which part of that do you not understand?

Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq

report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit

Thursday, June 22, 2006

Titanium Cat

In other words you've got nothing.

Are you still looking for that press conference where George W. Bush announces that they found WMDs in Iraq?

metaldeth_shredder

it doesn't matter that YOU think what coalition forces found is not WMD's(you have no credibility)

The most widely used definition of "weapons of mass destruction" are "nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons."

that's what the NCIS report states coalition forces found,

it only matters what the NCIS actually found:

"Since 2003, coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent. Despite many efforts to locate and destroy Iraq's pre-Gulf War chemical munitions, filled and unfilled pre-Gulf War chemical munitions are assessed to still exist."

so which part of that do you not understand?

Report: Hundreds of WMDs Found in Iraq

report by the National Ground Intelligence Center, a Defense Department intelligence unit

Thursday, June 22, 2006
============================================

what coalition forces found and the NCIS report supports is that either nuclear, chemical, and/or biological weapons were found in IRAQ.

Titanium Cat

Wow, cut and paste repetitive spamming. Truly convincing, LOL!