PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Conspiracy Theories
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-16-2007, 08:40 AM   #11 (permalink)
Thermite Boy
 
voodoo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 936
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
voodoo is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunflower View Post
Don't you just love that people will label this sort of thing "conspiracy theories" when, in fact, they are completely true - and of course, known by the public way past the time that anyone can be held responsible for their crimes?

He's a clever one. "We did'nt get everything right - 100 years from now we'll see" - which means, to historians, "don't blame me!"

Quote:
Originally Posted by White Rabbit View Post
Yeah, don't it make you sick?
Yes.
__________________
It's the truth, stupid.

Last edited by voodoo; 11-16-2007 at 08:43 AM.
voodoo is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 08:44 AM   #12 (permalink)
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 1,339
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
White Rabbit is a normal PG member
I not sure I can make any referrences to the Nazi regime but it sure does stink of what we as Americans are taught to hate. We don't do that, right? Sadly we do bury the truth and when it's all to late what will they do? Small men playing god in this world may lead to the end of us all.
Quote:
Originally Posted by voodoo View Post
He's a clever one. "We did'nt get everything right - 100 years from now we'll see" - which means, to historians, "it blame me!"



Yes.
White Rabbit is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2007, 11:08 AM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
VKMHVM2's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,843
My Mood:
Thanks: 92
Thanked 71 Times in 54 Posts
VKMHVM2 is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by sunflower View Post
Don't you just love that people will label this sort of thing "conspiracy theories" when, in fact, they are completely true - and of course, known by the public way past the time that anyone can be held responsible for their crimes?

"Conspiracy theorist" didn't become a negative term until Mel Gibson's 1997 movie "Conspiracy Theory". A lot of these conspiracies were being planned around that time. It's funny how these things work out, no?
VKMHVM2 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 11-17-2007, 05:47 AM   #14 (permalink)
Gone Tarpon Fishing
 
Duvidoo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,474
Thanks: 75
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Duvidoo is a normal PG member
Apologies if this is ancient news ... but it comes from a fairly impeccable source and deals with a number of issues that get aired around here:

http://www.cbc.ca/sunday/911hamilton.html

Excerpts:

Solomon: A question which has remained: Why did the debris of World Trade Center 7, of which nobody died there, so there was no real urgency to move the debris away, and that there have been questions: why wasn't it examined closer? Why was essentially evidence from what could have been a crime scene - or was a crime scene - removed very quickly from there?

Hamilton: You can’t answer every question when you conduct an investigation. Look, you've to got to remember that on this day, chaos and confusion were the mark, and peoples’ overwhelming concern was to try to save as many lives as possible, not to explain why a particular building collapsed. So it’s not unusual to me that we, and the Commission - and anybody else, for that matter - cannot answer every question. I go back to what I say earlier: whenever you conduct an investigation, you cannot answer every question.

Solomon: But should the Commission have .. I guess the question some people keep asking, should the Commission have asked more questions about the removal of the debris?

Hamilton: Look, you can say that about almost every phase of our investigation, 'you should have asked this, you should have asked that, you should have spent more time' - you’re conducting an investigation, you have a time limit, you don’t have unlimited time, you have a budget limit, you cannot go down every track, you cannot answer conclusively every question.
The members of the families that you referred to a minute ago submitted 150 questions to us - we answered a good many of them, we didn’t answer them all. You come to a point in an investigation where you have to say to yourself, 'what’s our responsibility, given the resources we have, how much can we do?' And you end up with a lot of questions unanswered. Look, I 've got a lot of unanswered questions in my mind.

* * *

Solomon: There’s also allegations that the Pakistani Secret Service, called the ISI, the head of which met here in the United States right before 9/11, and there’s some allegations and evidence to show that they paid Mohammed Atta $100,000. The reason this is important is: who funded the people who conducted the attacks, the terrorist attacks? What did the Commission make of payment from the ISI to Mohammed Atta of $100,000?

Hamilton: I don’t know anything about it.

Solomon: Was there any connection between.. Did the Commission investigate any connection between ISI, Pakistani intelligence, and..

Hamilton: They may have; I do not recall us writing anything about it in the report. We may have but I don’t recall it. We did estimate that Osama bin Laden spent about $500,000 for the 9/11 attacks. We did not identify all the sources of that money.

Solomon: And how it got to the …

Hamilton: That's right, you simply can’t trace it, so far as I know, because $500,000 in international financial markets is not even a blip on the radar screen. So we do not know precisely where that money came from.

* * *

Solomon: Questions about foreknowledge, especially as to when Vice President Dick Cheney knew when he went down to the protective bunker: there was some suggestion that the Secretary of Transport Mineta testified in front of the Commission that he in fact talked to Dick Cheney at 9:20 am. Cheney claims he hadn’t been there.. gotten down there until close to 10 am. That was eventually omitted from the final report,. Can you tell us a bit about about what Secretary of Transport Mineta told the Commission about where Dick Cheney was prior to 10 am?

Hamilton: I do not recall.

Last edited by Duvidoo; 11-17-2007 at 05:56 AM.
Duvidoo is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher