Save your sanctimonious crap for someone who cares. - Page 21

brian_wilbanks · 11-24-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunflower

Well, we certainly can't call you well-read on the subject, can we? Or does the image of me pampering WR's diaper turn you on? It must - you really obsess about him AND me quite a lot more than I would think is normal.

Depends on what subject you're talking about.

I dont know Dylan and Koreys favorite colors and I cant tell you Alex Jones favorite food.

sunflower · 11-24-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anhailla

thanks..I thought it was funny too.

a poll is a poll....it all depends on how you word things...
but a thousand people does not constitute 300 million

unless you use judy wood math

Well, tell that to all the political pollsters, then....they've got a lot of 'splaining to do!

sunflower · 11-24-2007, 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian_wilbanks

Depends on what subject you're talking about.

I dont know Dylan and Koreys favorite colors and I cant tell you Alex Jones favorite food.

I bet you could.

slowhand · 11-24-2007, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian_wilbanks

Sunflower claims to be objective, yet she automaticaly rejects or dodges any issue she doesnt understand. She brings up something about Dominoes and then you point out that dominoes lined up on a table do not support one another and she makes a quick turn to dodge the issue.

I dont think I mind her being a mod now that I htink about it because it's gonna be fun to watch her pamper WR's diaper.

But objective????

She backs everything up with copy and paste..Not one rational original thought..How can somebody define reasonable doubt when they arent willing to entertain any

anhailla · 11-24-2007, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gorillamom

Barbra Honegger needs to interview Joann Woodward. She was there and saw the plane hit the Pentagon. I believe there was a conspericy, but we didn't plant bombs. Why do all that work and spend money when Osama Bin Laden had it planned already. The reason Bush just sat there reading is he can't multi-task! That's a joke folks. They knew we were going to be attacked, and this administration did absolutly nothing to stop it. Of course they let the fighter planes go over the Atlantic instead of after the planes heading to the Whitehouse and Pentagon. Why ruin a good plot for the Bushco's.

I think the Govt knew an attack was imminent, hell... Richard Clark admits they were worried...but I still have yet to see a concrete piece of evidence that shows they knew the specifics.

btw, going over the alantic is a stardard defense scramble....
atleast it was at that point.

brian_wilbanks · 11-24-2007, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunflower

Ah, the famous wingless jumbo jetliner. Right.

Or the magic missile that can defy Newtons 2nd law of motion

Observed from an inertial reference frame, the net force on a particle is proportional to the time rate of change of its linear momentum: F = d[mv] / dt. Momentum is the product of mass and velocity. This law is often stated as F = ma (the force on an object is equal to its mass multiplied by its acceleration). Also a = F / m, if you are trying to find the acceleration of an object.

sunflower · 11-24-2007, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slowhand

She backs everything up with copy and paste..Not one rational original thought..How can somebody define reasonable doubt when they arent willing to entertain any

Put your six-shooters back in their holsters, there. I post stuff I think's interesting. You have your own opinions on it. And?

sunflower · 11-24-2007, 05:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian_wilbanks

Or the magic missile that can defy Newtons 2nd law of motion

Observed from an inertial reference frame, the net force on a particle is proportional to the time rate of change of its linear momentum: F = d[mv] / dt. Momentum is the product of mass and velocity. This law is often stated as F = ma (the force on an object is equal to its mass multiplied by its acceleration). Also a = F / m, if you are trying to find the acceleration of an object.

Copied from where?

anhailla · 11-24-2007, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunflower

Well, tell that to all the political pollsters, then....they've got a lot of 'splaining to do!

some polls are more scientific than others.

bornright · 11-24-2007, 05:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White Rabbit

People who believe 911 was an inside job are entitled to their beliefs just as any religion, political party and all the other things people believe. Over 1/3 of the country believes 911 was an inside job as shown by CNN polls and Time magazine.

Since there has been a lot of sanctimonious crap being flung on here by a particular group recently I think it’s only fair to point out that we are entitled to the same things they are.

But do we get it? No, so please spare me all my friends all the sanctimonious crap you have been shoveling out to us. If you want respect for your beliefs which are based on no science at all than you should reciprocate and show the proper respect for ours.

On another board you claimed an individual to be an expert on the 9/11 issue as being different than we were told. You were advised that this individual was one of the many air traffic controllers fired by President Reagan in 1981. This does not mean that the individual that you place so much confidence in is inaccurate, but it does make you look at him with a major question. Is he stating ths to get back at a Republican administration? Perhaps you and I should look at some of these so called experts that you throw out and what kind of real experience do they have. What kind of revenge or agenda do they have going? That could be the real conspiracy and not too look at that possibility would be very naive.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode