Duvidoo

Same here.

__________________

Denie the Delight
retarded Duvi showed up and made a fool of himself followed by you.

Denie

So you know for fact that evey piece of concrete was the size of a Babe Ruth bar...
You're not paying attention to where the concrete as found...in an apartment. How does one conclude that concrete would not be crushed into many different sizes?

Back to the original claim however..."the towers collapsed, basically to dust. An NIST is unable to explain why this phenomenon occurred".

This statement is patently false on its face value alone, yet you're here defending it.

The buildings did not collapse into dust, therefore it is not a "phenomenon"

Lets look at a pic and see if the WTC collapsed into dust here...



Hmmm...Appears to me to be a bit more than "...collapsed, basically to dust".

Okay, I think we can say the "collapsed, basically to dust" claim is debunked.

NEXT!

Duvidoo

I was only quoting something that YOU posted.
Maybe you should read that stuff before you post it.

PS the DUST reference likely refers to what it looked
like was happening rather than the size of the fragments
when they hit ground zero.
Don't take everything so literally.

PPS I wasn't the one who brought up Klingons.

__________________

Denie the Delight
retarded Duvi showed up and made a fool of himself followed by you.

Circus

Let's look at just the collapses of wtc 1 and 2 for now.

You don't accept 120 private experts that studied the first hand evidence for 3 straight years.
You don't accept the columbia university seismologists who stated the seismic records conclusively prove no secondary explosives were used.
You don't accept investigations by Purdue University as well as numerous other peer reveiwed papers.

What exactly would you accept as "proof"?

Duvidoo

I don't accept that the bulk of the evidence was never shown to any of them. It was a major crime scene. They should have had access to everything. And don't tell me that they did. We all know that they didn't. And unlike you and your pals I am not just concerned with the collapses of the two WTC towers. I said before I am interested in the WHOLE event. Including that mystery plane that you dismissed as irrelevant. Who made you the Arbiter of Relevance?

__________________

Denie the Delight
retarded Duvi showed up and made a fool of himself followed by you.

Circus

I provided a direct quote from the nist investigators who claim that they did have access to ground zero and reclycling yards. They also claim that they got all the steel that they deemed necessary.
Why should I believe "Duvidoo" over a direct quote from the nist experts? Can you provide evidence to the contrary? At this point, arn't you just looking for excuses not to believe the nist experts?

You still havn't explained what exactly you would accept as evidence.

dadakarma

It's been explained ad nauseam, ad infinitum on these threads. Learn to read.

__________________
Heck is for people who don't believe in gosh.

Circus

I know how to read. In fact, I remember reading your lies about nist having no access to the reclycing yards.
Remember when you told those lies? You usually have a lot of bullshit to say about... well... pretty much everything. But you now seem to steer clear away from that discussion

I forgot. Nist specifically said that they had all the samples they deemed necessary, but dadakarma on the internet knows better. I sometimes forget about your outrageous megalomania.

dadakarma

Steering away from the discussion? Hardly. Steering away from stupid bullshit and idiots? You bet.

__________________
Heck is for people who don't believe in gosh.

Circus

dadakarma: "nist didn't have access to the recylcing yards."
linked nist quote: "We had full access to the reclycling yards."
LOL