Save your sanctimonious crap for someone who cares. Part 2 - Page 117

slowhand · 12-03-2007, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

I am not having any of you characters telling
me what I said when I didn't say something.
This has nothing to do with semantics.

Uhhh..Isnt that what you've been doing?

Duvidoo · 12-03-2007, 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by slowhand

Uhhh..Isnt that what you've been doing?

How often have I misquoted you?
If I have done so, I apologize.

slowhand · 12-03-2007, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eagleclaw

So if this tower was so fragile as to collapse in the manner it did how did it survive the bombings from 1993?

Im not suggesting that the construction was fragile..What Im saying is that there are 59 exterior columns..(square tubing).. on every wall..thats 236 total, on each floor. from the 10th to the 110th.To sabotage them with thermite, you would have to tear the interior walls out..plant the thermite..wire it..snake the wires down..put new walls etc back up, like nothing happened

If you used TNT/Plastic explosive, you would have to do the same work, plus torch cut the columns to weaken them

Im no demo expert, but that sounds like an awful lot of work

slowhand · 12-03-2007, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

How often have I misquoted you?
If I have done so, I apologize.

Fair enough..Me too

eagleclaw · 12-03-2007, 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Circus

You're comparing bombs in the basement with fully loaded 757's crashing into the towers at 500+ miles per hour and an hours worth of unfought fires?
A new low.

You ignore the work of all those experts and instead rely more on obtuse comparisons and coincidences.

Hours worth of unfought fires?

Hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of relevant experts?

What will be your next exaggeration?

Circus · 12-03-2007, 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eagleclaw

Hours worth of unfought fires?

Hundreds upon hundreds upon hundreds of relevant experts?

What will be your next exaggeration?

I said an hours worth of unfought fires.
And yes, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of experts.
200 at nist
+
columbia university
pentagan forensics experts
purdue university investigations
fema experts

That officially takes us to hundreds and hundreds and hundreds.

Comicsartist · 12-03-2007, 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Circus

I said an hours worth of unfought fires.
And yes, hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of experts.
200 at nist
+
columbia university
pentagan forensics experts
purdue university investigations
fema experts

That officially takes us to hundreds and hundreds and hundreds.

Sounds like an oxymoron. Fema/experts???

Denie · 12-03-2007, 03:39 PM

ARRRGGGGG!!!

For christ sakes!! When the overwhelming consensus of scientific examination of the WTC collapse agree in theory of how the collapse transpired, at some point you have to ask yourself why, with no scientific evidence to point to any other credible reason, you keep ignoring the evidence agreed upon by mainstream science.

Why not start arguing that the planets don't revolve around the Sun because nobody has been far out in space enough to actually see the planet's revolve around the Sun.

Comicsartist · 12-03-2007, 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denie

ARRRGGGGG!!!

For christ sakes!! When the overwhelming consensus of scientific examination of the WTC collapse agree in theory of how the collapse transpired, at some point you have to ask yourself why, with no scientific evidence to point to any other credible reason, you keep ignoring the evidence agreed upon by mainstream science.

Why not start arguing that the planets don't revolve around the Sun because nobody has been far out in space enough to actually see the planet's revolve around the Sun.

Want me to? (J/K. Moment of levity seemed needed

)

Duvidoo · 12-03-2007, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denie

ARRRGGGGG!!!

For christ sakes!! When the overwhelming consensus of scientific examination of the WTC collapse agree in theory of how the collapse transpired, at some point you have to ask yourself why, with no scientific evidence to point to any other credible reason, you keep ignoring the evidence agreed upon by mainstream science.

Maybe you have closure from 9/11 but there are millions who don't. So maybe your scientists should check if the sun revolves around you, sugarbear.

12-03-2007, 03:39 PM	#1168 (permalink)
Denie Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 794 My Mood: Thanks: 38 Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts	ARRRGGGGG!!! For christ sakes!! When the overwhelming consensus of scientific examination of the WTC collapse agree in theory of how the collapse transpired, at some point you have to ask yourself why, with no scientific evidence to point to any other credible reason, you keep ignoring the evidence agreed upon by mainstream science. Why not start arguing that the planets don't revolve around the Sun because nobody has been far out in space enough to actually see the planet's revolve around the Sun.
	Top

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode