Scientific Theory for Controlled Demo Thread.

[sunflower]

Originally Posted by Denie

Peer review in which journal? Posting a paper on your own website is called "review by public".

Post the journal in which his paper was published. And let me state a "field related journal". In other words, publishing a engineering paper in a psychology journal doesn't count.

If you must know, he has already submitted one of his papers on the subject to an actual peer-reviewed, scientific print journal, and it is in that process.

But I've only said this, what, 1000 times already here?

[Denie]

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

Credulous = believable. Gosh. Now you go back, Marie, and find out where that article was peer reviewed. No cutting and pasting until you've done Denie's legwork.

Main Entry:
cred·u·lous Listen to the pronunciation of credulous
Pronunciation:
\ˈkre-jə-ləs\
Function:
adjective
Etymology:
Latin credulus, from credere
Date:
1576

1 : ready to believe especially on slight or uncertain evidence <accused of swindling credulous investors> 2 : proceeding from credulity <credulous superstitions>

Credulous does not = believable.

[Denie]

Originally Posted by sunflower

If you must know, he has already submitted one of his papers on the subject to an actual peer-reviewed, scientific print journal, and it is in that process.

But I've only said this, what, 1000 times already here?

Which journal has he submitted it to?

When his paper gets published, and gets through peer review, then you'll have something.

[Circus]

Originally Posted by Marie_D

Yes, I find it suspicious they put him on paid leave. Anytime anyone wants to talk about 911 they are told to SHUT UP. That's suspicious to me.

They wouldn't have put him on paid leave had he properly followed the peer review process.
I mean, this was a paper outlining the collapse of a building, and he didn't give it to a single structural engineer. Why? Again, what was he hiding?

He then put his paper on the schools scientific journal, even though it hadn't adequately passed peer review. That is against the school rules and is a fireable offense.
They gave him the benefit of the doubt and put him on paid leave while they started investigating his peer review. But instead he opted for early retirement, so as to avoid the investigation.
Again, you don't find that suspicious?

You think he should be allowed to break the rules of the school just because he believes in 9/11 conspiracy theories? Every other Professor at the school must pass peer review before placing their work on the scientific journals. You think Jones should have special priviledges?

It's always the same old story. You all try so hard to believe anything a conspiracy theorist has to say, but so hard to ignore anything remotely supporting the official story. It's once again why I don't believe that you are all on a search for "truth".

[Circus]

Originally Posted by Denie

1 : Credulous: ready to believe especially on slight or uncertain evidence

In other words, credulous means "anybody that believes in the work of Steven Jones".

[Duvidoo]

Originally Posted by Denie

Credulous does not = believable.

Sorry. I took it to be the opposite of "incredulous" and related to "credible" (as opposed to incredible). You learn something new every day (if you're lucky).

[Duvidoo]

Originally Posted by Circus

In other words, credulous means "anybody that believes in the work of Steven Jones".

Until such time as he receives that
valuable Denie-approved peer review.

[Denie]

So far, in this thread asking for scientific evidence supporting a scientific theory of CD, we have ZERO evidence for 10 pages.

Why is this the case? I was told there is plenty of such evidence, why is it so hard to post it??

[sunflower]

Originally Posted by Denie

Which journal has he submitted it to?

When his paper gets published, and gets through peer review, then you'll have something.

He's keeping mum about it - trying to keep his chance of its publishing high, and away from too much publicity. I'm sure he'll tell everyone interested once it's passed review. From my understanding, review can sometimes take years.

[Circus]

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

Until such time as he receives that
valuable Denie-approved peer review.

Or how about at the very least a "structural engineer approved" peer review?