Scientific Theory for Controlled Demo Thread.

[gorillamom]

Originally Posted by sunflower

But he also claims that the only theory is CD, when the official version of events is theoretical too. There is no definitive proof that it is true, either.

My proof is in the video's friends who were there, in the building and outside of them. As well as Joann Woodwards eyewitness account seeing the plane hit the Pentagone. Her and I have mutal friend, screenwriter Stewart Stern "Rebel Without A Cause".

[Denie]

Originally Posted by voodoo

Garbage out.

So, no thermite theories, huh? That's how science is conducted?



Good one!

Oh, there are lots of thermite theories. But scientific theories is what this thread is for. You do know there is a big difference in the two, right?
If you have any scientific theories regarding thermite, please post them here. That is the purpose of this thread. Please follow the posted criteria when considering the evidence.
Thanks.

[sunflower]

Originally Posted by Circus

I never said it was. I meant I'd read numerous peer reviewed papers on the collapse, as well as the nist report, fema, etc.

NIST did not write a sholarly piece. They wrote a gov't financed report on the collapse.
Peer review never happens under such circumstances.
I'm not sure if you fully understand what peer review actually is.

http://www.nistreview.org/

Maybe these guys do.

[Denie]

Originally Posted by Marie_D

Hello????? Didn't you watch the news that day?!? I remember what I heard and saw that day!!! Why is everyone suddenly changing the story? You believe Building 7 was NOT a controlled demolition? I thought that was a given.

Jesus, I have a headache.

Hope you all had a great holiday! See ya.

If it was/is a given, then which Demo company wired it? When did they do this?

[sunflower]

Originally Posted by gorillamom

My proof is in the video's friends who were there, in the building and outside of them. As well as Joann Woodwards eyewitness account seeing the plane hit the Pentagone. Her and I have mutal friend, screenwriter Stewart Stern "Rebel Without A Cause".

But it's not about planes or no planes...we all saw planes hitting the towers (can't say the same for the Pentagon, unless they decide to release a better view of the plane that's alleged to have hit it). Eyewitnesses reported all kinds of different aircraft - big plane, small passenger jet, cruise missile with wings.

I'm talking about proof of their version of events - you know? 19 hijackers, boxcutters, horrendous fire able to soften steel and convert two 1/4 mile tall buildings into about debris a few feet tall.

[gorillamom]

Originally Posted by sunflower

But it's not about planes or no planes...we all saw planes hitting the towers (can't say the same for the Pentagon, unless they decide to release a better view of the plane that's alleged to have hit it). Eyewitnesses reported all kinds of different aircraft - big plane, small passenger jet, cruise missile with wings.

I'm talking about proof of their version of events - you know? 19 hijackers, boxcutters, horrendous fire able to soften steel and convert two 1/4 mile tall buildings into about debris a few feet tall.

Then I suggest you contact Joann Woodward to hear her tell you about the plane she saw hitting the Pentagon. The only CT theory is that Bush and his admin did nothing to stop an attack they had prior knowledge of. Anything beyond that is people and their imaginations. I lost several friends including Anthony Perkins wife who was on one of those hijacked planes. Two of my brothers-in-laws are pilots for Delta and American. Has any of you CT theorist talked to anyone who was actually there? BTW. the gold was not in building #7 as many have suggested. It was in one of the towers, but I will not name which one.

[voodoo]

Originally Posted by Denie

If it was/is a given, then which Demo company wired it? When did they do this?

My guess? Sometime before it fell.

Originally Posted by Denie

Oh, there are lots of thermite theories. But scientific theories is what this thread is for. You do know there is a big difference in the two, right?

So, what part of SJones science does not meet that standard?

Originally Posted by Denie

If you have any scientific theories regarding thermite, please post them here. That is the purpose of this thread. Please follow the posted criteria when considering the evidence.
Thanks.

I don't follow the rules - that's what makes me a conspiracy theorist.

You're welcome!

[Denie]

You might as well just close this thread. It's now apparent nothing that meets the criteria for scientific theory or scientific evidence is going to be posted.

Sad that a intelligent discussion of scientific evidence couldn't be accomplished here.

The thread is now just another 9/11-no-evidence bickering spot.

Well, the 9/11 CT crowd has prevailed in hijacking the thread. I'd like to thank the moderators for their diligent effort in keeping people on topic...but I can't as this never happened.

I'm outta here!

[Duvidoo]

Originally Posted by Denie

If it was/is a given, then which Demo company wired it? When did they do this?

Come on. You expect anyone here to have that kind of information? They'd have to be party to the plot and I doubt they'd be lolling around a message board waiting to trip themselves up. Like I said before: AGENDA!

[Marie_D]

Originally Posted by Denie

WTF? Were did you get this from? Are you saying people went into a building on fire and set explosives?

Originally Posted by Denie

If it was/is a given, then which Demo company wired it? When did they do this?

Denie -

How am I supposed to know what Demo Company wired it, and when they did it? All I know is that I remember the news media reporting they had to demolish the building, because of extensive damage. They reported it several times. Don't you remember that? And then reading about it in the paper shortly after that? I know what I read and what I heard. Now all of a sudden, we change our minds. This is wierd. (but I really should get off the computer..lol.....)