Scientific Theory for Controlled Demo Thread.

[Denie]

Originally Posted by dadakarma

My, my - mighty defensive for a guy claiming such objectivity.

Jig's up.

Or, you just can't admit to what you said. Why is it I'm defensive when you get caught in a lie? That's a curious happenstance!!

It's there for anyone to see it. I'm sure there are plenty more instances where you have referred to the CD theory. But, hey...keep spinning away. Makes no difference to me.

[Denie]

Originally Posted by Sean

Yeah but, is that plural?

Hmmm...Dunno!!
Conspiracists? I'll have to look that one up...

[Sean]

Originally Posted by Denie

Hmmm...Dunno!!
Conspiracists? I'll have to look that one up...

Let me know because I pride myself on being a cunning linguist, wait; sorry that's a master cunnilinguis.

[Denie]

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

WTF is THE scientific method? Practically every discovery in the field of science came from thinking outside the box.

Really? WOW...Now, name one scientist that doesn't adhere to the scientific method. These are the one's that made "every discovery in the field of science" right?

Quite funny that you have no idea what the scientific method is, yet suggest that these discoveries came as a result of not adhering the scientific method.
Mind-boggling it is!!!

One can "think outside of the box" and adhere to the scientific method. Ironic, isn't it!!!

[dadakarma]

Originally Posted by Denie

Or, you just can't admit to what you said. Why is it I'm defensive when you get caught in a lie? That's a curious happenstance!!

It's there for anyone to see it. I'm sure there are plenty more instances where you have referred to the CD theory. But, hey...keep spinning away. Makes no difference to me.

I haven't lied anywhere on this or any other threads, nor have I claimed objectivity - I've been quite clear that I do not believe anything the Bush administration has said about 9/11, and have also been quite clear about where I stand on all the other theories: NONE can be proven (including BUSH's theory) without a thorough investigation.

Nice try, Denie.

[dadakarma]

Originally Posted by Denie

Really? WOW...Now, name one scientist that doesn't adhere to the scientific method. These are the one's that made "every discovery in the field of science" right?

Quite funny that you have no idea what the scientific method is, yet suggest that these discoveries came as a result of not adhering the scientific method.
Mind-boggling it is!!!

One can "think outside of the box" and adhere to the scientific method. Ironic, isn't it!!!

Dude - chill out. It's a fucking message board. Either learn how to have a discussion with people who don't think identically to you or find another way to amuse yourself.

Fuck, you're obnoxious....

[Denie]

Originally Posted by Sean

Let me know because I pride myself on being a cunning linguist, wait; sorry that's a master cunnilinguis.

Well, I can't find it used in the dictionary in the plural form. However, you see it used that way all the time. I'd say it's acceptable in the same way that irregardless is acceptable for regardless...or actually, I believe that's just the opposite!
Now you have me rabbling on...

[Denie]

Originally Posted by dadakarma

Dude - chill out. It's a fucking message board. Either learn how to have a discussion with people who don't think identically to you or find another way to amuse yourself.

Fuck, you're obnoxious....

In other words, don't point out your BS...
Got it...thanks for the handy tip!!

[Denie]

Originally Posted by dadakarma

I haven't lied anywhere on this or any other threads, nor have I claimed objectivity - I've been quite clear that I do not believe anything the Bush administration has said about 9/11, and have also been quite clear about where I stand on all the other theories: NONE can be proven (including BUSH's theory) without a thorough investigation.

Nice try, Denie.

See, to me when you say "Where do I say anything about CD theory" and post where you do just that and you then try to define it as only "speculation" I find you to be untruthful.

Sorry, that's just how it looks to me.

[Denie]

Originally Posted by dadakarma

Dude - chill out. It's a fucking message board. Either learn how to have a discussion with people who don't think identically to you or find another way to amuse yourself.

Fuck, you're obnoxious....

Just curious...is this the kind of discussion I'm to learn how to have? You must be the "poster boy" for discussion etiquette being you seem to lecture on it.

Originally Posted by dadakarma

You're a liar, too, then.

And you're in great company here with Wilbanks, Denie, Silverstein and Bush.

I'll try to follow your example...