Conclusive Proof That the "Official Story" is True - Page 2

VKMHVM2 · 11-26-2007, 11:32 AM

The Secret Service at Booker Elementary screwed up and did not realize Dubya was a target.

http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/9-...etservice.html

eagleclaw · 11-26-2007, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by VKMHVM2

The FBI knew nothing about the 1993 WTC bombing.

YouTube - Rare TV NEWS report about WTC bombing FBI Foreknowledge

Of course they knew nothing, they were too busy eating chicken wings and drinking pitchers of beer while watching football games.

This is fucking AMERICA and that is how we roll!!!!

VKMHVM2 · 11-26-2007, 11:41 AM

Middle Eastern men from a country beginning with the letter 'I' (Iraq? Iran?) set up video cameras aimed at the WTC Twin Towers before the first plane struck and were spotted celebrating after the impact.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34250,00.html

"The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards."

VKMHVM2 · 11-26-2007, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eagleclaw

Of course they knew nothing, they were too busy eating chicken wings and drinking pitchers of beer while watching football games.

This is fucking AMERICA and that is how we roll!!!!

Troy Aikman and the Dallas Cowboys were playing so well that they forgot to substitute harmless powder for the actual bomb.

Quote:

Salem, initially believing that this was to be a sting operation, claimed that the FBI's original plan was for Salem to supply the conspirators with a harmless powder instead of actual explosive to build their bomb, but that the FBI chose to use him for other purposes instead. [4] He secretly recorded hundreds of hours of telephone conversations with his FBI handlers; reported by Ralph Blumenthal in the New York Times, Oct. 28, 1993, secton A,Page 1

brian_wilbanks · 11-26-2007, 11:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

Well ... here you go. And not just cut and pastes from FOXNew s.v.p. Proof that the administration had no idea that something was afoot. Proof that the 1993 WTC bombing was indeed connected to al Qaeda. An explanation for why the President remained in a school classroom after learning that America was under attack. An explanation for why Iraq was invaded when it contained no al Qaeda hideaways (and why Pakistan which did have hideaways was left alone). You don't even have to mention Controlled Demolition if you don't want to.

The only problem we have with the truthers IS CD.

Dumbass in the classroom.....the prior knowledge...we're with you on those points 100%. I dont understand why that won't sink in.

It's just when you go off the deep end with missiles and CD and how Diesel fuel wont burn unless it's under pressure that you lose us.

wayside · 11-27-2007, 04:45 AM

You guys are losing me. I have been on the fence with so many of the issues surrounding 9/11 but the truther movement has become more of a joke than a serious action group seeking truth. I've crux of my problem is the "accepted as truth" theory of controlled demolition. It seems the entire basis of this theory is the manner in which the building fell. I asked, months ago, for some sign of an explosion, an explosion which would have to be fairly monstrous in size, and none has been forthcoming. I have asked for any comparative studies of buildings that have been struck by jet airliners of comparable size, and none has been forthcoming. So what I am left with is controlled demolition with no visible explosion, and no data showing that the collapse of the buildings was anything other than what would happen to a building the size of the WTC, struck by a vehicle(s) travelling at the rate of speed of the hijacked planes, spilling the amount of fuel that the jets were carrying. Lastly, and most important to me, I asked this months ago. If the buildings were rigged with explosives, what was the need to fly planes into them? The more people involved in a "conspiracy" the more the chances of discovery, either prior to or after the event. If controlled demolition took the buildings down the hijacking and crashing of the planes was a dangerous, unecessary part of the plot. You cannot build a case on theory alone. Along with facts there must be logic involved. I would like these basic questions to be answered.

Hugo de Balsac · 11-27-2007, 04:49 AM

as a 9 year old kid i recall going to NYC in December to sightsee with my mom and one of her friends. it was the only time i have ever been there. we did the typical runabout of Manhattan, the Statue of Liberty, Rockefeller Plaza, Macy's, etc. when we walked inside the WTC to take in the wonder, i was overcome by a deep sense of dread. the subway came rumbling in from underground and shook the main lobby, and you could feel the jet propelled elevators roaring upwards into the sky. it was a very stark impression for a young mind from rural North Carolina. we were going to go and visit the observation deck, but i didn't want to go. i told them both i wanted to leave, that i felt uncomfortable, and they being equally receptive to these sensations, understood and we walked out and thought of something else to do.

to New Yorkers the WTC represented something iconic, steadfast and mighty, but to me it felt overblown, egotistical and out of proportion with man's true greatness. on the one hand i am deeply troubled and saddened about what happened to that building, but not as much as i am vexed by the deaths of all of those hardworking people going about their business. i feel that we are being lied to about what actually happened that day, but i do not think i will have enough conclusive evidence in this lifetime to prove who the actual culprit is. i digress. and i hope nothing is ever built on that site again. or if something is built there, it honors the pain and suffering it has caused the majority of US citizens, soldiers, intellectuals and statesmen (and women) who work so diligently to have us all look the other way.

dadakarma · 11-27-2007, 09:06 AM

Quote:

i feel that we are being lied to about what actually happened that day, but i do not think i will have enough conclusive evidence in this lifetime to prove who the actual culprit is. i digress. and i hope nothing is ever built on that site again. or if something is built there, it honors the pain and suffering it has caused the majority of US citizens, soldiers, intellectuals and statesmen (and women) who work so diligently to have us all look the other way.

In a nutshell, and EXCELLENT.

wayside · 11-27-2007, 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dadakarma

In a nutshell, and EXCELLENT.

"who work so diligently to have us all look the other way."

What does that mean?

dadakarma · 11-27-2007, 09:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wayside

"who work so diligently to have us all look the other way."

What does that mean?

Distraction, distraction, distraction. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.

That's what it means.

11-26-2007, 11:32 AM	#11 (permalink)
VKMHVM2 Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: NYC Posts: 2,764 My Mood: Thanks: 84 Thanked 59 Times in 46 Posts	The Secret Service at Booker Elementary screwed up and did not realize Dubya was a target. http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/9-...etservice.html __________________ It's All Here! Dr. Albert Pastore: An Independent Investigation of 9-11 and the War on Terrorism
	Top

11-26-2007, 11:41 AM	#13 (permalink)
VKMHVM2 Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: NYC Posts: 2,764 My Mood: Thanks: 84 Thanked 59 Times in 46 Posts	Middle Eastern men from a country beginning with the letter 'I' (Iraq? Iran?) set up video cameras aimed at the WTC Twin Towers before the first plane struck and were spotted celebrating after the impact. http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,34250,00.html "The New York Times reported Thursday that a group of five men had set up video cameras aimed at the Twin Towers prior to the attack on Tuesday, and were seen congratulating one another afterwards." __________________ It's All Here! Dr. Albert Pastore: An Independent Investigation of 9-11 and the War on Terrorism Last edited by VKMHVM2; 11-26-2007 at 11:43 AM.
	Top

11-27-2007, 04:45 AM	#16 (permalink)
wayside Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: The Top Hat Lounge Posts: 1,290 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	You guys are losing me. I have been on the fence with so many of the issues surrounding 9/11 but the truther movement has become more of a joke than a serious action group seeking truth. I've crux of my problem is the "accepted as truth" theory of controlled demolition. It seems the entire basis of this theory is the manner in which the building fell. I asked, months ago, for some sign of an explosion, an explosion which would have to be fairly monstrous in size, and none has been forthcoming. I have asked for any comparative studies of buildings that have been struck by jet airliners of comparable size, and none has been forthcoming. So what I am left with is controlled demolition with no visible explosion, and no data showing that the collapse of the buildings was anything other than what would happen to a building the size of the WTC, struck by a vehicle(s) travelling at the rate of speed of the hijacked planes, spilling the amount of fuel that the jets were carrying. Lastly, and most important to me, I asked this months ago. If the buildings were rigged with explosives, what was the need to fly planes into them? The more people involved in a "conspiracy" the more the chances of discovery, either prior to or after the event. If controlled demolition took the buildings down the hijacking and crashing of the planes was a dangerous, unecessary part of the plot. You cannot build a case on theory alone. Along with facts there must be logic involved. I would like these basic questions to be answered.
	Top

11-27-2007, 04:49 AM	#17 (permalink)
Hugo de Balsac subterranean cosmonaut Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: under the stars Posts: 68 My Mood: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	as a 9 year old kid i recall going to NYC in December to sightsee with my mom and one of her friends. it was the only time i have ever been there. we did the typical runabout of Manhattan, the Statue of Liberty, Rockefeller Plaza, Macy's, etc. when we walked inside the WTC to take in the wonder, i was overcome by a deep sense of dread. the subway came rumbling in from underground and shook the main lobby, and you could feel the jet propelled elevators roaring upwards into the sky. it was a very stark impression for a young mind from rural North Carolina. we were going to go and visit the observation deck, but i didn't want to go. i told them both i wanted to leave, that i felt uncomfortable, and they being equally receptive to these sensations, understood and we walked out and thought of something else to do. to New Yorkers the WTC represented something iconic, steadfast and mighty, but to me it felt overblown, egotistical and out of proportion with man's true greatness. on the one hand i am deeply troubled and saddened about what happened to that building, but not as much as i am vexed by the deaths of all of those hardworking people going about their business. i feel that we are being lied to about what actually happened that day, but i do not think i will have enough conclusive evidence in this lifetime to prove who the actual culprit is. i digress. and i hope nothing is ever built on that site again. or if something is built there, it honors the pain and suffering it has caused the majority of US citizens, soldiers, intellectuals and statesmen (and women) who work so diligently to have us all look the other way.
	Top

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode