Duvidoo

I don't know and neither do you. NONE of us KNOW for certain.
And anyone who claims they do is shooting the bull.

__________________

Denie the Delight
retarded Duvi showed up and made a fool of himself followed by you.

Duvidoo

No. That's just one possibility.
I'm all for a more thorough
investigation so that the families
of the victims can have closure
in this matter. What is wrong
with that?

__________________

Denie the Delight
retarded Duvi showed up and made a fool of himself followed by you.

sunflower

So are these people:

__________________
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act”.

George Orwell

************************************

The owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American Dream....'cos you have to be asleep to believe it.

George Carlin

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...m8fo8ne6xy.gif

Titanium Cat

So then you are perpetuating the idea of a conspiracy theory in the downing of the twin towers. If it wasn't the hijackers then it was a conspiracy.

Now you claim that no one knows for certain. Few things in life are certain. So who do you think is most probably behind the alleged conspiracy you have repeatingly suggested?

Titanium Cat

Suggesting that one possibility (repeatingly) does qualify as perpetuating a conspiracy theory.

What's wrong with it is your bias won't allow you to accept anything else. There will never be an investigation that you will approve of. If you can't accept the results of hundreds of educated and trained engineers and scientists who are you going to trust? Who will you trust to make a thorough investigation? Who gets to pick the investigators? You?

sunflower

So are you saying that the investigations thus far have answered every question to your satisfaction?

__________________
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act”.

George Orwell

************************************

The owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American Dream....'cos you have to be asleep to believe it.

George Carlin

http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...m8fo8ne6xy.gif

Titanium Cat

Well that goes without saying...

DanS.

As far as the science of it yes...

Titanium Cat

Every question by whom?

And do I expect there ever will be? No. There will always be unknowns in such an event. That doesn't mean that there is credible evidence supporting what would have to be a massive conspiracy.

Circus

In regards to the collapses of the wtc buildings, yes.
If any of the experts that studied the collapses for 3 years had said "The buildings couldn't have collapsed just from the plane impact and fires. Somethings wrong here." Or if any of them had said "We found evidence for what may have been explosives"
well, then I'd be suspicious. We know that NIST isn't scared to complain (like that one guy that wanted further fire testing for future safety reasons). So the fact that no one has come out and talked about finding explosives speaks volumes.

If any of the fire captains or chiefs that appraised wtc7 had said "The building seemed entirely stable. I have no idea why it collapsed"
well, then I'd be suspiciuos.

If any of the seismologists had said "there appears to be evidence of secondary explosives"
well, then I'd be suspicious.

However, if I really really really just wanted to believe in this conspiracy, I'd probably ignore all those experts and hide behind crap such as "we're just asking questions".