Peer Review Papers on the WTC collapse.

Denie · 11-30-2007, 04:22 PM

Let's try something different since the Scientific theory thread got spammed into oblivion.

This thread is to post peer review papers from science/engineering journals on why the WTC might have collapsed in the manner they did. Please don't spam the thread with papers published for public review which have bypassed peer review. This would include papers published on a website who's author is in anyway affiliated with the site.

Thanks.

White Rabbit · 11-30-2007, 04:31 PM

And you think thats not going to happen here. For the last 3 years of doing 911 post this always happens so get a reality check newbie.

Save your sanctimonious crap for someone who cares.

Denie · 11-30-2007, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White Rabbit

And you think thats not going to happen here. For the last 3 years of doing 911 post this always happens so get a reality check newbie.

So then just not post anything if you can't contribute. Quite easy I should assume!

White Rabbit · 11-30-2007, 04:36 PM

Save your sanctimonious crap for someone who cares.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denie

So then just not post anything if you can't contribute. Quite easy I should assume!

Denie · 11-30-2007, 04:38 PM

. P. Bazant and Y. Zhou, "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?", Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics News, vol. 34, No. 8 (October, 2001).

http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf

Denie · 11-30-2007, 04:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White Rabbit

Save your sanctimonious crap for someone who cares.

Err...for a person not afflicted with verbigeration. Guess I needed to explain that.
Thanks for yet again displaying your total sum of intelligence.

Denie · 11-30-2007, 04:46 PM

Would it be possible for the Moderator to actually moderate this thread...please.
WR has already begun to spread it's droppings.

White Rabbit · 11-30-2007, 04:47 PM

Yeah well see if you last 3 years doing that?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denie

Err...for a person not afflicted with verbigeration. Guess I needed to explain that.
Thanks for yet again displaying your total sum of intelligence.

Denie · 12-01-2007, 10:20 PM

So where are the peer review papers for CD?

This is funny. I start a thread for scientific evidence in support of a CD theory and certain members here demand that I first post evidence of a opposing theory.

Here I do just that and nothing from the CD camp at all. Amazing!!

voodoo · 12-02-2007, 02:52 AM

I'm still stuck on my empirical verbigirations paradigm but as soon as I warp back to reality ...

Seriously, peer review != science.

"When the gov is wrong it is dangerous to be right"

So, in terms of our little neck of the world - you might try to debunk his science - I'm not a scientist but I'd start with something like.

1) Did he use a thermometer rather than a spectrometer to identify thermite?
2) Do the samples match the admins?

11-30-2007, 04:22 PM	#1 (permalink)
Denie Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 257 My Mood: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Peer Review Papers on the WTC collapse. Let's try something different since the Scientific theory thread got spammed into oblivion. This thread is to post peer review papers from science/engineering journals on why the WTC might have collapsed in the manner they did. Please don't spam the thread with papers published for public review which have bypassed peer review. This would include papers published on a website who's author is in anyway affiliated with the site. Thanks.
	Top

11-30-2007, 04:31 PM	#2 (permalink)
White Rabbit Banned Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Latitude 37° 47' 26" Longitude -122° 26' 44" Posts: 1,336 My Mood: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	And you think thats not going to happen here. For the last 3 years of doing 911 post this always happens so get a reality check newbie. Save your sanctimonious crap for someone who cares. Last edited by White Rabbit; 11-30-2007 at 04:33 PM.
	Top

11-30-2007, 04:38 PM	#5 (permalink)
Denie Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 257 My Mood: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	. P. Bazant and Y. Zhou, "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?", Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics News, vol. 34, No. 8 (October, 2001). http://www-math.mit.edu/~bazant/WTC/WTC-asce.pdf
	Top

11-30-2007, 04:46 PM	#7 (permalink)
Denie Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 257 My Mood: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Would it be possible for the Moderator to actually moderate this thread...please. WR has already begun to spread it's droppings.
	Top

12-01-2007, 10:20 PM	#9 (permalink)
Denie Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 257 My Mood: Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	So where are the peer review papers for CD? This is funny. I start a thread for scientific evidence in support of a CD theory and certain members here demand that I first post evidence of a opposing theory. Here I do just that and nothing from the CD camp at all. Amazing!!
	Top

12-02-2007, 02:52 AM	#10 (permalink)
voodoo Thermite Boy Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Texas Posts: 936 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	I'm still stuck on my empirical verbigirations paradigm but as soon as I warp back to reality ... Seriously, peer review != science. "When the gov is wrong it is dangerous to be right" So, in terms of our little neck of the world - you might try to debunk his science - I'm not a scientist but I'd start with something like. 1) Did he use a thermometer rather than a spectrometer to identify thermite? 2) Do the samples match the admins? __________________ It's the truth, stupid.
	Top

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

New To Site?	Need Help?
Register to Participate View Forum Leaders Contact Us	Frequently Asked Questions Did you forget your password? Mark Forums Read