Okay here's the challenge to all 911 debaters! - Page 9

sunflower · 12-01-2007, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anhailla

hundreds of specialists?...and no one did an abdominal ultrasound? no biopsy? I believe you, but that is utterly bizarre

anyway, I am glad she is ok..

I don't know the intimate details, but you might read her book...

it's Fran Drescher, anhailla...who would have thought? She KNEW something was wrong, and it took her close to a year to get the diagnosis...imagine if she HAD listened to the others (nothing's wrong, go home)...

So sometimes, your instincts ARE correct. Do you see?

dadakarma · 12-01-2007, 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunflower

Actually, anhailla, I'll tell you a true story. Seems that there's this woman, who knew something was wrong with her, and went from doctor to doctor to doctor, and they all told her there was nothing wrong. She insisted she knew her own body, and kept searching for answers about her health. Finally, after literally hundreds of specialists, she went to see a doctor and he discovered what was wrong with her - ovarian cancer. And because she was so insistent, she was able to be treated, and lived to tell the story.

You'll never guess who that woman is.

Edit: Your answer showed up as soon as I posted this. Glad it wasn't you. What an ordeal.

My mother's story is similar, with a few exceptions:

*Instead of hundreds, it was dozens of doctors
*Rather than all of them telling her there was nothing wrong, each of them had a new diagnosis: rheumatoid arthritis, Epstein-Barr syndrome, Valley Fever, an eating disorder and depression.

The last doctor discovered terminal cancer, finally. At that point, you better believe she was depressed, in pain, and unable to eat. She weighed 87 pounds. She died four months later. She'd begun seeking treatment A YEAR earlier.

So - Anhailla's point is that the "majority" were correct, then? LAME....

White Rabbit · 12-01-2007, 03:19 PM

You know dada and SF I like all these people who think they are smarty pants fall on the butts.

Quote:

Originally Posted by dadakarma

LOL!

You guys refuse to commit to a position because you're scared of how it will define you. That's why you stupidly separate "MIHOP" from "LIHOP".

dadakarma · 12-01-2007, 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White Rabbit

You know dada and SF I like all these people who think they are smarty pants fall on the butts.

They reveal their own presumptuousness when the 'demand' that we give them specifics about who did what, when, how, etc. - because THEY are so confidently 'certain' of what happened.

anhailla · 12-01-2007, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sunflower

I don't know the intimate details, but you might read her book...

it's Fran Drescher, anhailla...who would have thought? She KNEW something was wrong, and it took her close to a year to get the diagnosis...imagine if she HAD listened to the others (nothing's wrong, go home)...

So sometimes, your instincts ARE correct. Do you see?

of course instincts can be correct..but you still need proof that they are
doctors aren't going to treat her for ovarian cancer until they KNOW she has it.

dadakarma · 12-01-2007, 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anhailla

of course instincts can be correct..but you still need proof that they are
doctors aren't going to treat her for ovarian cancer until they KNOW she has it.

Of course not. So...you're making apologies and excuses for people who DO NOT KNOW SOMETHING FOR CERTAIN.

Make a note to yourself here.

anhailla · 12-01-2007, 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dadakarma

Of course not. So...you're making apologies and excuses for people who DO NOT KNOW SOMETHING FOR CERTAIN.

Make a note to yourself here.

apologies? excuses?

it was Sf's analogy...

dadakarma · 12-01-2007, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anhailla

apologies? excuses?

it was Sf's analogy...

Sorry if you can't see it. Ask SF to explain it to you.

Denie · 12-01-2007, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by White Rabbit

yeah with you not answering questions and we answered yours. that a very common tactic. So yes or no?

[F Black]Hey dada and SF do you think 911 was an inside job yes or no?

[/font]

Funny you keep pushing for a opinion in a thread that you started for only scientific evidence. So much for you staying on-topic in your own thread!!

You seem to think I'll answer yes or no to vague question.
Do I think it's possible that Bush may have had some kind of forewarning of the 9/11 events? YES. Is there scientific evidence to prove that? NO.

Do I think that Bush had ordered the entire thing? No. Is there scientific evidence to prove that? NO.

The fact that you and others don't like my qualified answer instead of the black and white answer you want, doesn't mean I've not answered.

It only means you don't like my answer because it doesn't fit into your myopic paradigm.

dadakarma · 12-01-2007, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Denie

Funny you keep pushing for a opinion in a thread that you started for only scientific evidence
You seem to think I'll answer yes or no to vague question.
Do I think it's possible that Bush may have had some kind of forewarning of the 9/11 events? YES. Is there scientific evidence to prove that? NO.

Do I think that Bush had ordered the entire thing? No. Is there scientific evidence to prove that? NO.

The fact that you and others don't like my qualified answer instead of the black and white answer you want, doesn't mean I've not answered.

It only means you don't like my answer because it doesn't fit into your myopic paradigm.

Waah, waah. Sore loser.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode