PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Conspiracy Theories
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2007, 07:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Latitude 37° 47' 26" Longitude -122° 26' 44"
Posts: 1,336
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
White Rabbit is a normal PG member
Question Hey all you ROCKET scientist explain how a 47 story building collapse in 6.5 seconds.

The Vertical Collapse of Building 7

1)Building 7 fell with a smooth vertical motion.

2)The collapse was complete in 6.5 seconds.

3)Free-fall time from Building 7's roof is 5.96 seconds.


Please watch all videos they are from main stream media and show the same thing form different view points.







This is the primary reason I do not believe the 911 commission report to be factual. If you look at these videos and can't use your own eyes and common sense that building 7 was brought down than you may want to by the Brooklyn Bridge.

This is only the tip of the iceberg as I went to investigate the veracity of the
of the official story I was faced with red flag after red flag.
White Rabbit is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mike D.'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Alabama
Posts: 394
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Mike D. is a normal PG member
Here's what some real rocket scientists say:

FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.

NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.

According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."

There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.

Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time."

WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors — along with the building's unusual construction — were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.
__________________
Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. ~Leo Tolstoy
Mike D. is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
anhailla's Avatar
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 3,602
Thanks: 103
Thanked 62 Times in 49 Posts
anhailla is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Rabbit View Post
The Vertical Collapse of Building 7

1)Building 7 fell with a smooth vertical motion.

2)The collapse was complete in 6.5 seconds.

3)Free-fall time from Building 7's roof is 5.96 seconds.


Please watch all videos they are from main stream media and show the same thing form different view points.

YouTube - 9/11: DAN RATHER SAYS WTC COLLAPSES LOOK LIKE DEMOLITIONS

YouTube - WTC Building 7 Collapse Compared with Controlled Demolitions

YouTube - WTC-7 Any Questions

YouTube - WTC 7 Explosive Energy

YouTube - "Seven is Exploding"


This is the primary reason I do not believe the 911 commission report to be factual. If you look at these videos and can't use your own eyes and common sense that building 7 was brought down than you may want to by the Brooklyn Bridge.

This is only the tip of the iceberg as I went to investigate the veracity of the
of the official story I was faced with red flag after red flag.
it didn't fall in 6.5 seconds...that's a made up number from conspiracy websites

welcome back WR
__________________
...either I go, or that wallpaper does.

Oscar Wilde
anhailla is online now   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Latitude 37° 47' 26" Longitude -122° 26' 44"
Posts: 1,336
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
White Rabbit is a normal PG member
You do realize you just made of list of theories no scientific evidence to back it up there for invalid to me. No pictures, no math no videos just something someone pulled out their ass.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike D. View Post
FACT: Many conspiracy theorists point to FEMA's preliminary report, which said there was relatively light damage to WTC 7 prior to its collapse. With the benefit of more time and resources, NIST researchers now support the working hypothesis that WTC 7 was far more compromised by falling debris than the FEMA report indicated. "The most important thing we found was that there was, in fact, physical damage to the south face of building 7," NIST's Sunder tells PM. "On about a third of the face to the center and to the bottom — approximately 10 stories — about 25 percent of the depth of the building was scooped out." NIST also discovered previously undocumented damage to WTC 7's upper stories and its southwest corner.

NIST investigators believe a combination of intense fire and severe structural damage contributed to the collapse, though assigning the exact proportion requires more research. But NIST's analysis suggests the fall of WTC 7 was an example of "progressive collapse," a process in which the failure of parts of a structure ultimately creates strains that cause the entire building to come down. Videos of the fall of WTC 7 show cracks, or "kinks," in the building's facade just before the two penthouses disappeared into the structure, one after the other. The entire building fell in on itself, with the slumping east side of the structure pulling down the west side in a diagonal collapse.

According to NIST, there was one primary reason for the building's failure: In an unusual design, the columns near the visible kinks were carrying exceptionally large loads, roughly 2000 sq. ft. of floor area for each floor. "What our preliminary analysis has shown is that if you take out just one column on one of the lower floors," Sunder notes, "it could cause a vertical progression of collapse so that the entire section comes down."

There are two other possible contributing factors still under investigation: First, trusses on the fifth and seventh floors were designed to transfer loads from one set of columns to another. With columns on the south face apparently damaged, high stresses would likely have been communicated to columns on the building's other faces, thereby exceeding their load-bearing capacities.

Second, a fifth-floor fire burned for up to 7 hours. "There was no firefighting in WTC 7," Sunder says. Investigators believe the fire was fed by tanks of diesel fuel that many tenants used to run emergency generators. Most tanks throughout the building were fairly small, but a generator on the fifth floor was connected to a large tank in the basement via a pressurized line. Says Sunder: "Our current working hypothesis is that this pressurized line was supplying fuel [to the fire] for a long period of time."

WTC 7 might have withstood the physical damage it received, or the fire that burned for hours, but those combined factors — along with the building's unusual construction — were enough to set off the chain-reaction collapse.
White Rabbit is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:24 PM   #5 (permalink)
A TRUE comic's artist
 
Comicsartist's Avatar
 
Tournaments Won: 8

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: We'll miss ya, George.
Posts: 6,612
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 6
Thanks: 73
Thanked 125 Times in 82 Posts
Comicsartist is a spectacular PG memberComicsartist is a spectacular PG member
Tough call who to believe...Fema, who manage to manage not a damn thing, or the NIST...whom I admittedly know little about, so you decide...Just saying.
__________________
The art of a first rate intelligence is the ability to hold two opposing thoughts in mind at the same time while still retaining the ability to function.

-F. Scott Fitzgerald-
Comicsartist is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:25 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Latitude 37° 47' 26" Longitude -122° 26' 44"
Posts: 1,336
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
White Rabbit is a normal PG member
Thank you anhailla. it did that the facts don't face it if you don't want. All the videos show that they fell in 6.5 seconds.
Quote:
Originally Posted by anhailla View Post
it didn't fall in 6.5 seconds...that's a made up number from conspiracy websites

welcome back WR
White Rabbit is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:28 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
anhailla's Avatar
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 3,602
Thanks: 103
Thanked 62 Times in 49 Posts
anhailla is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by White Rabbit View Post
Thank you anhailla. it did that the facts don't face it if you don't want. All the videos show that they fell in 6.5 seconds.
you must have missed the threads on 7, I have to much work to do to pull back up the posts, but I would be delighted to in the future

duty calls
__________________
...either I go, or that wallpaper does.

Oscar Wilde
anhailla is online now   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 07:32 PM   #8 (permalink)
Banned
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Latitude 37° 47' 26" Longitude -122° 26' 44"
Posts: 1,336
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
White Rabbit is a normal PG member
Must have now go take your duty?LOL
Quote:
Originally Posted by anhailla View Post
you must have missed the threads on 7, I have to much work to do to pull back up the posts, but I would be delighted to in the future

duty calls
White Rabbit is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 08:08 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
VKMHVM2's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 2,652
My Mood:
Thanks: 75
Thanked 53 Times in 41 Posts
VKMHVM2 is a famous PG member
Building 7 song. The collapse of Building 7 is timed in the music video...


Last edited by VKMHVM2; 12-04-2007 at 08:22 PM.
VKMHVM2 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2007, 08:19 PM   #10 (permalink)
Latin Lover
 
sunflower's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central Fla.
Posts: 2,594
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sunflower is a normal PG member
"Officially", NIST claims the total collapse of 7 occurred in 8.2 seconds. That's still 5.7 floors per second.

They have, however, as yet failed to complete their analysis of Building 7.
__________________
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act”.

George Orwell

************************************

The owners of this country know the truth. It's called the American Dream....'cos you have to be asleep to believe it.

George Carlin


http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r...m8fo8ne6xy.gif
sunflower is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:26 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher