Titanium Cat

It would be a great start. All those engineers and arcitects and not one paper demonstrating the NIST report to be false. Not one.

Ever actually read an Engineering journal?

How totally moronic Ptech is.

Titanium Cat

Or maybe a "I gave some conspiracy wacko $10 and all I got was this shirt" shirt.

Ptech

I don't think I ever have read an engineering journal.

Have you ever read an aviation journal?

Titanium Cat

You want to explain why that's relevant to the discussion of the WTC collapses? You were the one promoting architects & engineers for truth. Structural Engineers publish in engineering journals, not aviation journals.

brian_wilbanks

Have you?

__________________



If you don't like my fire, then don't come around, cuz I'm about to burn one down.

Ptech

TC

Architects & Engineers are just that and more. They have the courage to confront what happened there by strict analysis and not government press releases.

Worse than the attacks that day is the conspiracy of silence that exists within the mainstream media. Any engineering journals you might be talking about would fall into that category. They are not going to go against the official version for a variety of reasons, including that of cowardice.

You may recall the "study and simulation" done by Purdue University. What you probably never heard about was the blowback from several alumni who were angry at the University for publishing such a facile and inaccurate piece.

One need not be an engineer to understand basic physics, and the fact that those buildings collapsed at free fall rates flatly contradicts the laws of physics, no matter what George Bush and his minions say. The evidence of explosions is overwhelming, and that flatly contradicts the official story of gravitational collapse.

You may, of course, embrace whatever silly fantasies that suit your titanium kitty, but please don't expect to be considered as having any sort of titanium cranium. You have fallen for the most spectacular lie told by any government any time, as did I for 4 years.

Anybody that believes that story in 2008 is delusional.

Titanium Cat

But alas, they don't have the courage to submit their analysis for formal review to a respected journal. Now why is that?

[sarcasm]Oh absolutely! We all know that engineering journals are owned by the mainstream media.[/sarcasm]*

[sarcasm]Oh of course, thousands of scientists and engineers are all scared of the government and won't dare publish anything that might contradict the offical version. It happens all the time. Same thing with the moon landing, we all know it was faked.[/sarcasm]*

And you of course have a credible source that backs this up...

You were too lazy or incapable of calculating the gravitational potential energy stored in the WTC towers that explains why so much of the concrete was turned to dust. That's basic physics yet it eludes you.

Yet amazingly nobody has published a paper for review that indicates how the laws of physics were contradicted. Why? Oh right, I forget, everyone is scared.

It's overwhelming as long as you ignore the vast amount of evidence that flatly contradicts it.

And now you've fallen for one of the most idiotic conspiracy theories in existance for how long?

Yeah but you're not delusional. Where are those pieces of Flight 93 hidden again?

*truthers sometimes have great difficulty recognizing sarcasm

Ptech

If the Peer Reviewed that you value so much is the same as Bush/Cheney Reviewed, then does it really matter?

Pardon the shitty pun, but are you an Elitist? Do you need others to do your thinking for you, or are you simply affiliated with one of those Engineering Journals that make you cream your jeans?

The potential energy was stored in those towers for 30 some odd years. Does that give it an exponential factor? And then suddenly it was released by aircraft strikes that had been calculated into the original design. And which it withstood, as designed, for an hour until somebody fired off the charges.

Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that I accept your argument, that the official story is true and valid.

Basically, you are asking me to accept the word of the most mendacious administration in the history of this country.

That, in spite of the fact that the vast majority of the available evidence conflicts with the official story.

How fucking stoopid would I be to accept such an argument?

brian_wilbanks

Tech-speak is not your Forte'

__________________



If you don't like my fire, then don't come around, cuz I'm about to burn one down.

anhailla

Ironic, considering the name...

__________________
...either I go, or that wallpaper does.

Oscar Wilde