PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Conspiracy Theories
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-17-2008, 08:16 PM   #1161 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
anhailla's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,546
Thanks: 187
Thanked 116 Times in 87 Posts
anhailla is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ptech View Post
Well it's either sinister or innocent, and I said that in my first post.
or it could have been a tragic accident...which is more likely. So if you think it might have been deliberate and "sinister" (I assume you mean a bomb) how do you know that wasn't the act of a foreign terrorist? Just curious.
__________________
...either I go, or that wallpaper does.

Oscar Wilde
anhailla is online now   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2008, 05:41 AM   #1162 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Ptech's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Pierce FL
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
Ptech is going down hill
ANH

I was interrupted last night, mid post.

I noted several times here that one possibility is an accidental missle firing. Friendlly fire. Rather like Pat Tillman's death.

And like Pat Tillman's death, the government's first tendency seems to be to lie about it and attempt a coverup. IMO, that is the most likely explanation. But about 100 witnesses noticed something like a missle launch, so I don't see how that can be ignored.

If it was deliberate, then the passenger list would be most interesting to analyze.

My question from the beginning has been why on earth did the Prez hold a press conference about an airplane crash? He does not do this for other crashes, nor does he hold a press conference when trains are derailed.
Ptech is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 03:28 PM   #1163 (permalink)
non whiner
 
bdd1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ontario,ca
Posts: 864
My Mood:
Thanks: 33
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
bdd1 is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ptech View Post
ANH

I was interrupted last night, mid post.

I noted several times here that one possibility is an accidental missle firing. Friendlly fire. Rather like Pat Tillman's death.

And like Pat Tillman's death, the government's first tendency seems to be to lie about it and attempt a coverup. IMO, that is the most likely explanation. But about 100 witnesses noticed something like a missle launch, so I don't see how that can be ignored.

If it was deliberate, then the passenger list would be most interesting to analyze.

My question from the beginning has been why on earth did the Prez hold a press conference about an airplane crash? He does not do this for other crashes, nor does he hold a press conference when trains are derailed.
the answer is: why not?
__________________
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

This is Khan he's tough and ruthless!
This is Quan he's rough and toothless.
(a fist full of yen)
bdd1 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2008, 05:40 PM   #1164 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Ptech's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Pierce FL
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
Ptech is going down hill
This might be over your head BDD, but I will try to explain.

The Office of President does not usually comment upon accidents in the US transportation sector on the day they happen. Bridge collapses in St. Paul to train wrecks to airplanes over running the runway in Chicago.

It's always been that way. We would like to think that the prez himself had better things to do than inform the public of plane accidents and such, even if that something to do is getting a blow job in the oval office.

But Bubba had to interrupt his evening to comment on this particular accident.

I wonder how many OTHER accidents in the public transportation have received the president's personal attention like that?
Ptech is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:27 AM   #1165 (permalink)
non whiner
 
bdd1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ontario,ca
Posts: 864
My Mood:
Thanks: 33
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
bdd1 is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ptech View Post
This might be over your head BDD, but I will try to explain.

The Office of President does not usually comment upon accidents in the US transportation sector on the day they happen. Bridge collapses in St. Paul to train wrecks to airplanes over running the runway in Chicago.

It's always been that way. We would like to think that the prez himself had better things to do than inform the public of plane accidents and such, even if that something to do is getting a blow job in the oval office.

But Bubba had to interrupt his evening to comment on this particular accident.

I wonder how many OTHER accidents in the public transportation have received the president's personal attention like that?
no explanation necessary most especially yours ..no planes man.
what's most likely is president clinton deemed it important for reasons of his own.
__________________
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

This is Khan he's tough and ruthless!
This is Quan he's rough and toothless.
(a fist full of yen)
bdd1 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 01:20 PM   #1166 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Ptech's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Fort Pierce FL
Posts: 1,285
Thanks: 34
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
Ptech is going down hill
Yeah, I heard somewhere that President Clinton used to have a radio program giving traffic advisories. He would take time from his schedule to announce various traffic accidents around the greater DC area. During the long commercial breaks, it was fellatio time.

What a racket, eh?
Ptech is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 01:55 PM   #1167 (permalink)
non whiner
 
bdd1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ontario,ca
Posts: 864
My Mood:
Thanks: 33
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
bdd1 is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ptech View Post
Yeah, I heard somewhere that President Clinton used to have a radio program giving traffic advisories. He would take time from his schedule to announce various traffic accidents around the greater DC area. During the long commercial breaks, it was fellatio time.

What a racket, eh?
your point?! the much maligned blow job will not be the first or last in the white house..so again what's your point?!
__________________
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

This is Khan he's tough and ruthless!
This is Quan he's rough and toothless.
(a fist full of yen)
bdd1 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 01:57 PM   #1168 (permalink)
Gone Tarpon Fishing
 
Duvidoo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,467
Thanks: 75
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Duvidoo is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdd1 View Post
your point?! the much maligned blow job will not be the first or last in the white house..so again what's your point?!
The thought of J. McCain getting oral service in the Oval Office is too scary to contemplate. Ewwwwwwwwwwww.
__________________
Both phrases are meaningless, if the person(s) who are doing the saying of the phrases are worthless pieces of shit that have nothing better to do in their miserable little empty lives than go on a political board and call other posters Lying Fucksticks or Lying Pieces of Shit....
— Anon.
Duvidoo is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 02:01 PM   #1169 (permalink)
non whiner
 
bdd1's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: ontario,ca
Posts: 864
My Mood:
Thanks: 33
Thanked 21 Times in 14 Posts
bdd1 is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duvidoo View Post
The thought of J. McCain getting oral service in the Oval Office is too scary to contemplate. Ewwwwwwwwwwww.
ALMOST AS FRIGHTING AS GETTING A TINKER BELL ERECTION!
btw PETER PAN IS BISEXUAL!
__________________
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

This is Khan he's tough and ruthless!
This is Quan he's rough and toothless.
(a fist full of yen)
bdd1 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 02:14 PM   #1170 (permalink)
Gone Tarpon Fishing
 
Duvidoo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,467
Thanks: 75
Thanked 14 Times in 12 Posts
Duvidoo is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bdd1 View Post
ALMOST AS FRIGHTING AS GETTING A TINKER BELL ERECTION!
btw PETER PAN IS BISEXUAL!

I thought Pete was usually a cross dresser.
And there's that "frighting" word again.
You do have a way with the language ...
or perhaps that's just the American spelling?
In HOOK they had Julia "Pretty Woman"
playing Tink ... not nearly as appealing
as the cartoon one with the big knockers.



Yowza, yowza.
__________________
Both phrases are meaningless, if the person(s) who are doing the saying of the phrases are worthless pieces of shit that have nothing better to do in their miserable little empty lives than go on a political board and call other posters Lying Fucksticks or Lying Pieces of Shit....
— Anon.
Duvidoo is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher