bdd1

I was referring to my "simple" typing error.
It might be helpful for you to remember your own posts.
"gladitorial" is spelled (Gladiatorial).
YES it is very much a GLADIATORIAL CONTEST.
To be more precise it's the forces of knowledge(everybody else) vs the forces of pseudo knowledge(twoofers).

__________________
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

This is Khan he's tough and ruthless!
This is Quan he's rough and toothless.
(a fist full of yen)

Ptech

TWA-800 Shoot Down

THIS is the rational analysis of TWA 800.

Yep, it was taken out by a missle, and an experienced military aviator saw the incident.

anhailla

When in that article does it say He thinks the Navy deployed the missile?

he is talking about terrorism isn't he?

__________________
...either I go, or that wallpaper does.

Oscar Wilde

Ptech

ANH

Having only read the article once, I don't remember his mentioning the US Navy, though he did indeed state the obvious--it could have been a friendly fire incident, as I've said from the start.

Partin did mention something about foreign involvment, but I think more along the lines of some meeting in Paris in the next few days, suggesting that some passenger onboard was the reason for the shootdown if it was not a simple mistake.

Judging from the awesome coverup, my guess is that it was NOT a simple mistake.

Pretty cool weapon though, the continuous rod warhead.

bdd1

The NTSB investigation ended with the adoption of their final report on August 23, 2000. In it they concluded that the probable cause of the accident was "an explosion of the center wing fuel tank (CWT), resulting from ignition of the flammable fuel/air mixture in the tank. The source of ignition energy for the explosion could not be determined with certainty, but, of the sources evaluated by the investigation, the most likely was a short circuit outside of the CWT that allowed excessive voltage to enter it through electrical wiring associated with the fuel quantity indication system."[1]

Alternative theories propose that an external missile strike by a U.S. Navy vessel or terrorist, or, alternatively, an on-board bomb, caused the crash.[5][6][7] The NTSB investigation considered the possibility that a bomb or missile caused the mishap, but "none of the damage characteristics typically associated with a high-energy explosion of a bomb or missile warhead (such as severe pitting, cratering, petalling, or hot gas washing) were found on any portion of the recovered airplane structure".[8]

where is the evidence as motioned above?

__________________
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

This is Khan he's tough and ruthless!
This is Quan he's rough and toothless.
(a fist full of yen)

Ptech

BBD

When you make posts like the one above, you completely reveal your superficial understanding of what happened. You reveal that you did not even read Partin's analysis.

I know what the NTSB report said sunshine, and I know that it was a political coverup for whatever reason--incompetence or malevolence.

Simple minds like yours are easily manipulated by those desiring to do so.

bdd1

where is the evidence as motioned above?
got any I thought not........ nice dodge.!

__________________
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

This is Khan he's tough and ruthless!
This is Quan he's rough and toothless.
(a fist full of yen)

Ptech

TC must be on vacation or something. I thought she would be all over Partin's analysis in her usual manner--calling him an asshole and asserting her vast knowledge of all things linkable.

bdd1

I did read the article and he is a self serving asshole!

National Transportation Safety Board nowhere in the investigation or witness list is his name brought up you can check this yourself by using the handy link I have provided.
so that make his story extrapolation of speculation based on made up shit as there is no hard evidence to back up his claims and cheap model work.

__________________
extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence!

This is Khan he's tough and ruthless!
This is Quan he's rough and toothless.
(a fist full of yen)

Ptech

Totally in character you simple clown.

You say a man with like 30 years experience in explosives and weapons systems is a self-serving fool because he tells the truth as best he knows how.

All you guys here must be children, except Brian and ANH.