Ptech

That would be an incorrect assumption.

Titanium Cat

So then can we agree that it was AA Flights 11 and 175 that struck the World Trade Center towers?

Ptech

No, we cannot agree on that.

We can agree that WHAT APPEARED TO BE those flights struck the towers, but there is no proof that the flights themselves struck the towers.

That's why the parts of any and all aircraft involved in the events of that day are stored in Iron Mountain, behind closed doors.

Titanium Cat

I see, no proof whatsoever. But Flight 11 and Flight 175 did take off that morning heading to the West Coast, correct?

But you of course have definitive proof of this, right?

Duvidoo

Some choice. Flights 11 & 175 or holograms.
There are many different alternatives.
Just for starters there were no Arabs listed
on any of the boarding lists ... so how did
19 hijackers not only get aboard but wrest
control away from crews who were dedicated
to the safety of their passengers? But it is
hardly the official story or holograms.
That is pure bullshit and you know it.

Duvidoo

Titanium Cat

What about the airplane parts of flights 11 and 175, the ones we were talking about? Remember according to Ptech those planes didn't actually hit the WTC towers, so where are they?

Ptech doesn't believe there were any pieces left of Flight 93. Non-existant parts of it must be stored there.

Duvidoo

Lord only knows what they've got there.
They may even have that Roswell alien.
I have seen a UFO at close quarters....

Titanium Cat

You don't actually think they were holograms, do you?

And where pray tell, is your source for this claim.

Titanium Cat

So in other words, once again, there is no evidence of the "real" flights 11 and 175 being stored there.

Why does that not surprise me?