The NORAD Response to 9/11 - Page 3

Duvidoo · 07-22-2008, 11:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian_wilbanks

And you've posted WHAT?

The link to the NORAD tapes which seems to be giving your friend endless pleasure.

brian_wilbanks · 07-22-2008, 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

That was one of your posts, Brian.
Pay attention.

He's YOUR golden boy.

He figured out the connection between the weight of Mel Gibsons chair and 9/11.

You should be proud...the gap is closing.

As soon as he figures out the connection to "Don't Mess With the Zohan" the puzzle will be complete and the whole thing will come crashing down.

Titanium Cat · 07-22-2008, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian_wilbanks

He's YOUR golden boy.

He figured out the connection between the weight of Mel Gibsons chair and 9/11.

You should be proud...the gap is closing.

As soon as he figures out the connection to "Don't Mess With the Zohan" the puzzle will be complete and the whole thing will come crashing down.

Yeah silly me for reading something real and relevant to 9/11 like the NORAD tapes as opposed to listening to some total crackpot like Richard Andrew Grove as Duvidoo does. He's really looking for closure for the victims and their families listening to that nutcase.

bdd1 · 07-22-2008, 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ptech

now how did i know that would be your reply? Gosh, i guess i'm getting to know you too damn well!

You, tc, are nothing but a tech-savvy and petulant juvenile who too frequently does not have a clue as to what she is talking about.

Assuming you are female.

Drg has more knowledge and common sense in his little finger than you have in your entire body, titanium cranium included.

Here's a clue, for the umpteenth time tc--when you must resort to attacking the messenger, as you do all the time, it is a dead giveaway that you have nothing of substance to offer. It is a clear sign your argument cannot prevail, and you are aware of it.

truther bullshit rule # 12:when you must resort to attacking the messenger, as you do all the time, it is a dead giveaway that you have nothing of substance to offer. It is a clear sign your argument cannot prevail, and you are aware of it.

Duvidoo · 07-22-2008, 01:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titanium Cat

Yeah silly me for reading something real and relevant to 9/11 like the NORAD tapes as opposed to listening to some total crackpot like Richard Andrew Grove as Duvidoo does. He's really looking for closure for the victims and their families listening to that nutcase.

Look, missie, 'twas I who found the NORAD article and even read it first time around in Vanity Fair. As opposed to you who avoids VF like the plague because of its (Canadian) editor with the funny hair and its habit of occasionally running with articles on things of which you don't approve. I just came back from my personal closure case ... my relatives who were killed by the friends of Bush's grandpapa ... nothing that would interest a navel gazer like you. So shut the fuck up, bitch.

Duvidoo · 07-22-2008, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bdd1

truther bullshit rule # 12:when you must resort to attacking the messenger, as you do all the time, it is a dead giveaway that you have nothing of substance to offer. It is a clear sign your argument cannot prevail, and you are aware of it.

This ranks as the best Kettle/Pot post ever.
Nearly spewed up all over my Tinkerbell doll.

brian_wilbanks · 07-22-2008, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

... nothing that would interest a navel gazer like you. So shut the fuck up, bitch.

.......

Duvidoo · 07-22-2008, 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian_wilbanks

.......

I wasn't attacking a messenger ... I was attacking your foul mouthed bitch of a friend who was pretending she brought the NORAD link to the table. I was the messenger.......

Titanium Cat · 07-22-2008, 01:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

Look, missie, 'twas I who found the NORAD article and even read it first time around in Vanity Fair.

Yeah but too bad you have never learned to actually comprehend what you read.

Quote:

As opposed to you who avoids VF like the plague because of its (Canadian) editor with the funny hair and its habit of occasionally running with articles on things of which you don't approve.

LOL, you are such a fool.

Quote:

I just came back from my personal closure case ... my relatives who were killed by the friends of Bush's grandpapa ... nothing that would interest a navel gazer like you.

Too bad you don't actually give a shit about closure for the victims and families of 9/11.

Quote:

So shut the fuck up, bitch.

Or what little man?

Titanium Cat · 07-22-2008, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Duvidoo

I wasn't attacking a messenger ... I was attacking your foul mouthed bitch of a friend who was pretending she brought the NORAD link to the table.

Lying asshole, I never said or pretended I brought it to the table. I even stated it was you who first posted it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titanium Cat

Part One: Flight 11

Duvidoo posted a link to the Vanity Fair article about the NORAD response to 9/11. It's pretty detailed and includes lots of actual recordings of what was communicated on that day. The times seem to match up well so far with what I've seen before.

Yep that looks just like your name right there at the very beginning of the OP. What a lying piece of shit you are.

Quote:

I was the messenger.......

Yet you are too fucking lazy to actually make heads and tails out of what the article outlines.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode