WeAreChangeLA questions Rep. Grace Napolitano about Treason

VKMHVM2 · 09-07-2008, 02:48 PM

Although somewhat evasive about her own responsibility as a Congressperson, she did say at one point that the Congress knew the executive branch was guilty of treason, without elaborating, and also said she would pass the information to her friend, Representative Silvestre Reyes of Texas, who is the Chair of the House Intelligence Committee.

YouTube - WeAreChangeLA questions Rep. Grace...

Ptech · 09-07-2008, 04:27 PM

Very good. The young man is to be commended for his education of and questioning of the elected representative. And she for being so even-handed about it.

In the end she dodged, but what should we expect? She is more informed after those 7 minutes than she was before, so that's good.

She is clearly not related to the judge Andrew Napolitano, for he understands too well the criminality of the Bush administration.

Denie · 09-07-2008, 05:30 PM

As far as I'm concerned, there are probably several things the executive branch has done that could actually be proved in or out of court to be treasonous.
Planing the CD of the WTC just isn't one of them.

Ptech · 09-08-2008, 08:53 AM

What do you know Denie--we ACTUALLY AGREE on something!

You're right that it cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the executive branch planned and executed the attacks at WTC. Perhaps not even to the civil standard of preponderance of the evidence.

But it can be EASILY proven to the more demanding standard that the executive branch has not only forsaken its oath of office, it has also flouted the law and attacked the US Constitution. That is a cakewalk.

But the circumstantial case as to the OCT being a lie is overwhelming.

09-07-2008, 04:27 PM	#2 (permalink)
Ptech Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Fort Pierce FL Posts: 1,304 Thanks: 35 Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts	Very good. The young man is to be commended for his education of and questioning of the elected representative. And she for being so even-handed about it. In the end she dodged, but what should we expect? She is more informed after those 7 minutes than she was before, so that's good. She is clearly not related to the judge Andrew Napolitano, for he understands too well the criminality of the Bush administration.
	Top

09-07-2008, 05:30 PM	#3 (permalink)
Denie Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 794 My Mood: Thanks: 38 Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts	As far as I'm concerned, there are probably several things the executive branch has done that could actually be proved in or out of court to be treasonous. Planing the CD of the WTC just isn't one of them.
	Top

09-08-2008, 08:53 AM	#4 (permalink)
Ptech Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Fort Pierce FL Posts: 1,304 Thanks: 35 Thanked 24 Times in 22 Posts	What do you know Denie--we ACTUALLY AGREE on something! You're right that it cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the executive branch planned and executed the attacks at WTC. Perhaps not even to the civil standard of preponderance of the evidence. But it can be EASILY proven to the more demanding standard that the executive branch has not only forsaken its oath of office, it has also flouted the law and attacked the US Constitution. That is a cakewalk. But the circumstantial case as to the OCT being a lie is overwhelming.
	Top

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.politicalgroove.com/conspiracy-theories/9685-wearechangela-questions-rep-grace-napolitano-about-treason.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date
conspiracy theories: Blogs, Photos, Videos and more on Technorati	This thread	Refback	09-09-2008 06:04 PM