PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Economics & Finance
Share PG Forum Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-11-2008, 02:24 PM   #1 (permalink)
In The Slammer
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 812
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
bornright is a normal PG member
Who to blame?

There are economic problems in this country but who is really to blame?

The price of gas is moving up very rapidly and many are blaming Bush. We forget that he recommended drilling in Alaska and off the coast. The democrats in Congress blocked this even though the people in Alaska wanted to drill. How could anyone blame Bush for this foolish choice not to drill which causes us to be more dependent on foriegn oil.

President Bush has recommended that this nation move toward alternate fuel. He recommended that corn not be used for the making of ethanol. We immediately started producing ethanol with the use of corn which is a very poor and expensive way to produce ethanol. Gasoline with ethanol is just as high if not higher than just gasoline. If you think that gasoline you put in your car is expensive wait until you see what your food will soon cost because of the use of corn which is what the president warned us of. Other problems in this country will seem small. Expect all meat products to jump very quickly. You vegetarians will not escape as this high demand for corn will affect what farmers plant. Shortages cause higher prices for those that are not aware of it.
bornright is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 02:40 PM   #2 (permalink)
One Flew Over the Cheese
 
Titanium Cat's Avatar
 
Tetris Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: No Idea
Posts: 4,254
My Mood:
Thanks: 6
Thanked 54 Times in 36 Posts
Titanium Cat is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bornright View Post
There are economic problems in this country but who is really to blame?

The price of gas is moving up very rapidly and many are blaming Bush. We forget that he recommended drilling in Alaska and off the coast. The democrats in Congress blocked this even though the people in Alaska wanted to drill. How could anyone blame Bush for this foolish choice not to drill which causes us to be more dependent on foriegn oil.
As has been said before, ANWR represents only a relatively small amount of oil (maybe about 10.4 BBL). By the time it was developed and producing at maximum capacity it would have little or no effect on the price of oil which is the primary reason that gasoline prices rising.

Quote:
President Bush has recommended that this nation move toward alternate fuel. He recommended that corn not be used for the making of ethanol. We immediately started producing ethanol with the use of corn which is a very poor and expensive way to produce ethanol. Gasoline with ethanol is just as high if not higher than just gasoline. If you think that gasoline you put in your car is expensive wait until you see what your food will soon cost because of the use of corn which is what the president warned us of. Other problems in this country will seem small. Expect all meat products to jump very quickly. You vegetarians will not escape as this high demand for corn will affect what farmers plant. Shortages cause higher prices for those that are not aware of it.
What are you talking about, only 2 years ago Bush was strongly backing ethanol produced from corn. And newer cellulose based ethanol is still years away from significant production levels. It won't be a magic bullet in reducing oil consumption.
__________________

Duvidoo, without any evidence whatsoever to support it, suggests that a FDNY Fire Chief might be in on a conspiracy which murdered over 300 fellow firefighters and 2500 other people:

Quote:
... I want to hear Silverstein under oath. Chief Nigro I have no opinion on whatsoever. He may have his price ... who knows? [1]
Titanium Cat is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 03:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
In The Slammer
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 812
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
bornright is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium Cat View Post
As has been said before, ANWR represents only a relatively small amount of oil (maybe about 10.4 BBL). By the time it was developed and producing at maximum capacity it would have little or no effect on the price of oil which is the primary reason that gasoline prices rising.
There are many that claim otherwise. Let them drill.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium cat
What are you talking about, only 2 years ago Bush was strongly backing ethanol produced from corn. And newer cellulose based ethanol is still years away from significant production levels. It won't be a magic bullet in reducing oil consumption.
You are incorrect as he has critized using corn from the beginning. Listen to his speeches not what the media says he said.
bornright is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 04:40 PM   #4 (permalink)
eighth stone from the sun
 
neptune's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 1,421
My Mood:
Thanks: 90
Thanked 52 Times in 24 Posts
neptune is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bornright View Post
There are economic problems in this country but who is really to blame?

The price of gas is moving up very rapidly and many are blaming Bush. We forget that he recommended drilling in Alaska and off the coast. The democrats in Congress blocked this even though the people in Alaska wanted to drill. How could anyone blame Bush for this foolish choice not to drill which causes us to be more dependent on foriegn oil.

President Bush has recommended that this nation move toward alternate fuel. He recommended that corn not be used for the making of ethanol. We immediately started producing ethanol with the use of corn which is a very poor and expensive way to produce ethanol. Gasoline with ethanol is just as high if not higher than just gasoline. If you think that gasoline you put in your car is expensive wait until you see what your food will soon cost because of the use of corn which is what the president warned us of. Other problems in this country will seem small. Expect all meat products to jump very quickly. You vegetarians will not escape as this high demand for corn will affect what farmers plant. Shortages cause higher prices for those that are not aware of it.
You're believing your own spin, Tex.

ANWR oil is just a small small fraction -- wouldn't make a dent in the supply enough to affect the price (much).

You apparently are ignoring the 30-40% "security tax" the disasterous US Middle East policy (endless war) has imposed.

Try this on for size -- the Bush tax breaks for gazillionaires and the unpaid for wars have bankrupted our grandchildren. And then, there is the wholesale looting of the Treasury by no-bid contracts, and policies like MEdicare drug benefit, etc, etc...
__________________
Holy Mudhead, mackerel! Morse Science High!
It's....disappeared!
-- Firesign Theatre
neptune is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 05:02 PM   #5 (permalink)
One Flew Over the Cheese
 
Titanium Cat's Avatar
 
Tetris Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: No Idea
Posts: 4,254
My Mood:
Thanks: 6
Thanked 54 Times in 36 Posts
Titanium Cat is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by bornright View Post
There are many that claim otherwise.
And they would be lying. It would take 10 years before the oil started flowing from ANWR and by then it would amount to maybe around 4% of US imports. Compared to global oil production it would only add a tiny amount to the supply, not enough to significantly reduce prices.

Quote:
You are incorrect as he has critized using corn from the beginning. Listen to his speeches not what the media says he said.
You are, not surprisingly, sadly mistaken. It is you who should listen to his speeches.

Bush Delivers Speech on Renewable Fuel Sources - washingtonpost.com

Quote:
Quote from Bush's speech on renewables
... The ethanol industry is booming. It must be exciting to have worked for as long as you have on encouraging alternative sources of energy and then all of a sudden see the work come to fruition.

Last year, America used a record 4 billion gallons of ethanol. There are now 97 ethanol refineries in our country, and nine of those are expanding and 35 more are under construction. The ethanol industry is on the move, and America is better off for it.

Many of these refineries are in the Midwest -- the Midwest because that is where the source -- you know, the feed stock for ethanol comes from.

BUSH: That happens to be corn.

But what's really interesting, there are new plants springing up in unexpected areas, like the Central Valley of California, or Arizona, or, of course, in the sugar fields of Hawaii. After all, sugar can be used for ethanol. As a matter of fact, it's a very efficient feedstock for ethanol.

Ethanol required our support. In other words, to get this new industry going it required a little nudge from the federal government.

Since I took office we've extended the tax credit of 51 cents gallon for suppliers. We've created a new 10-cent-per-gallon tax credit to provide extra help to small ethanol producers and farmers. We've provided $85 million of loans and grants for the ethanol business ventures.

In other words, this is a collaborative effort. The federal government has got a role to play to encourage new industries that'll help this nation diversify away from oil.

And so, we're strongly committed to corn-based ethanol produced in America. Yet you've got to recognize there are limits to how much corn can be used for ethanol. I mean, after all, we got to eat some.
Doesn't sound too critical to me. The push to cellulose ethanol is the new fad but as I said it is years away from significant production.
__________________

Duvidoo, without any evidence whatsoever to support it, suggests that a FDNY Fire Chief might be in on a conspiracy which murdered over 300 fellow firefighters and 2500 other people:

Quote:
... I want to hear Silverstein under oath. Chief Nigro I have no opinion on whatsoever. He may have his price ... who knows? [1]
Titanium Cat is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2008, 09:01 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,384
Blog Entries: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 37 Times in 25 Posts
cheapseats is a famous PG member
I am told that using corn for ethanol is completely inefficient, and that it has tripled the price of corn...the corn they plant, the corn we eat, and the corn that the animals we eat eat.

And shock of shockers, soaring food prices.

Who IS driving the use of corn in ethanol?

Who is benefiting?
__________________
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*©2008 Implausible Endeavors LLC
ImplausibleEndeavors.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
cheapseats is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 05:41 AM   #7 (permalink)
In The Slammer
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 812
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
bornright is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by cheapseats View Post
I am told that using corn for ethanol is completely inefficient, and that it has tripled the price of corn...the corn they plant, the corn we eat, and the corn that the animals we eat eat.

And shock of shockers, soaring food prices.

Who IS driving the use of corn in ethanol?

Who is benefiting?
50 lbs of treated seed corn is $200.00
bornright is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 05:58 AM   #8 (permalink)
In The Slammer
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 812
Thanks: 1
Thanked 19 Times in 16 Posts
bornright is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium Cat View Post
And they would be lying. It would take 10 years before the oil started flowing from ANWR and by then it would amount to maybe around 4% of US imports. Compared to global oil production it would only add a tiny amount to the supply, not enough to significantly reduce prices.
Nobody is requesting you invest your money in drilling in Alaska. There are many willing to do it. Let them invest their money as they are convinced there is enough oil to make a difference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Titanium Cat
You are, not surprisingly, sadly mistaken. It is you who should listen to his speeches.


Doesn't sound too critical to me. The push to cellulose ethanol is the new fad but as I said it is years away from significant production.
In a speech President Bush gave on March 20, 2007 on Energy Intiatives at the Ford Motor Company, Kansas City Assembly Plant Claycomo, Missouri. He has given this speech numerous times.

And here in the Midwest you have seen a boom in ethanol production and ethanol usage. And the reason why is, is that corn-based ethanol is leading an amazing change in the country. We consume about 5 billion gallons of ethanol right now in America. That's up nearly fivefold in a relatively quick period of time. The problem we face is that right now the most efficient way to make ethanol is through the use of corn -- and that's fine if you're a corn grower, but it's not fine if you're a hog raiser, because that price of corn is beginning to affect the people who are raising hogs. And I understand that. That's why we're spending a fair amount of money on developing new types of technology that will enable us to use something besides corn to make ethanol -- whether it be switchgrasses, or agricultural refuse, or wood chips.
bornright is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 06:18 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Sean's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Austin, Texas...ya'll
Posts: 1,420
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 16
Thanked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Sean is a normal PG member
I blame the dumbasses who voted for Dumbya.
__________________
http://www.politicalgroove.com/image.php?type=sigpic&userid=111&dateline=12013880  94
Quote:
Originally Posted by W.M.DEEEZ View Post
...my uvula spends a bit of time in the proximity of a vulva...
Sean is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2008, 11:25 AM   #10 (permalink)
wherediditgo?
 
Rigged's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Dartmouth, MA (but mostly the library)
Posts: 370
My Mood:
Thanks: 39
Thanked 27 Times in 20 Posts
Rigged is a normal PG member
I am a big fan of science Friday on NPR and yesterday they had a very interesting segment about biofuels. At university of Michigan they have created a cellulose based biofuel extracting a enzyme from a cows second stomach and genetically planting it in corn, in the vacuole (the cell's garbage can) which at harvest time fills up and converts it into alchaole, the big deal about this is that fuels can be made from stalks, the other parts of the plant! This is huge! Here is the link.

Science Friday Archives: Biofuels Research Roundup
__________________
It is what they want, after all: "a god to punish, not a man of their infirmity."
Rigged is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher