PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Site Discussion > Election Center 2008
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-15-2008, 08:42 PM   #91 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 22,525, Level: 93 Points: 22,525, Level: 93 Points: 22,525, Level: 93
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 7,715
Thanks: 975
Thanked 339 Times in 229 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
David Gregory floats too many lies ---- he really has to go!

Andrea Mitchell had to correct him.


What is going on on CNN?
RK77 is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:45 PM   #92 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 22,525, Level: 93 Points: 22,525, Level: 93 Points: 22,525, Level: 93
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 7,715
Thanks: 975
Thanked 339 Times in 229 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanS. View Post
I fail to see how a corp tax rates accomplish any of that though. And really that's the logic that is used to give tax breaks for giving to charity.
High taxes for polluting, lower taxes for production with environment safety in mind.
RK77 is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:47 PM   #93 (permalink)
Master of Quill-Fu
Points: 26,684, Level: 97 Points: 26,684, Level: 97 Points: 26,684, Level: 97
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
Heretic's Avatar
 
Space Invaders Champion! Pool Jam - 10 Minute Game Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Taylorsville, "Utahistan" [stuck in the 20th century]... Now can I have my foreign aid/bribe???
Posts: 9,664
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 78
Thanked 312 Times in 241 Posts
Heretic is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanS. View Post
stock options have nothing to do with profits.
Another sham. Often profits are hidden by reinvestment- often not within their own company. Whoever told you otherwise lied to you.

Quote:
If a CEO exercises it's stock options it doesn't come out of a company's profits...it comes out of investors in the secondary markets pocket.
Right, and no shuffling around happens at all.

Quote:
If Corporations have offshore mailing addresses they aren't American corporations....but any profits MADE here are still taxed here. If coke makes profits in Japan it pays Japanese taxes on those profits.
You can't be that obtuse. American corporations are using these out-of-country mailing addresses to evade taxes. This isn't in dispute. You're defending a vaporous myth.

Quote:
Any money made in offshore accounts is taxed when it is brought back here.
Maybe you should tell the journalists at Frontline who proved that it isn't getting taxed. You might win a Peabody with that "discovery."

Quote:
But anyways...NONE of this addresses the need or the logic behind the taxes.
It does in fact. America corporations have been avoiding their responsibility for many years, and it's time they chip in to shore up the country that gave them their shot.
__________________
"In space no one can hear you scream. in D.C. it won't matter..." -Clinton Resurrection: The Alien Queen lives!
Heretic is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:48 PM   #94 (permalink)
Administrator
Points: 27,203, Level: 97 Points: 27,203, Level: 97 Points: 27,203, Level: 97
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
DanS.'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,638
My Mood:
Thanks: 158
Thanked 356 Times in 264 Posts
DanS. is a spectacular PG memberDanS. is a spectacular PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RK77 View Post
High taxes for polluting, lower taxes for production with environment safety in mind.
I would be happier fining companies for polluting than increasing or decreasing their tax rates based on the level of pollution. It takes ALOT longer to get something like that through congress than it does to create an enforcement agency that can operate into perpetuity without the need to ask congress for every action that it takes. Alot like OSHA.
DanS. is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:52 PM   #95 (permalink)
Administrator
Points: 27,203, Level: 97 Points: 27,203, Level: 97 Points: 27,203, Level: 97
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
DanS.'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,638
My Mood:
Thanks: 158
Thanked 356 Times in 264 Posts
DanS. is a spectacular PG memberDanS. is a spectacular PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heretic View Post
Another sham. Often profits are hidden by reinvestment- often not within their own company. Whoever told you otherwise lied to you.



Right, and no shuffling around happens at all.



You can't be that obtuse. American corporations are using these out-of-country mailing addresses to evade taxes. This isn't in dispute. You're defending a vaporous myth.
I honestly have no clue what you're trying to say here. I can't even respond because I think you may be confused about some things but I'm not sure what they are....seriously wtf?

Quote:
Maybe you should tell the journalists at Frontline who proved that it isn't getting taxed. You might win a Peabody with that "discovery."
You're right it doesn't get taxed UNTIL it's brought back here. That's why they go offshore because they can make money on their investments without paying taxes on the front end and only on the backend....again...this might be one of the things you're confused about. But I should clarify...they paid money on the profits initially but they don't on the profits made via investment each year...almost like your 401k. and REALLY it's a symptom of overtaxation...seeking tax shelters is part of what happens.


Quote:
It does in fact. America corporations have been avoiding their responsibility for many years, and it's time they chip in to shore up the country that gave them their shot.
They're doing their fair share by either paying their EEs more, paying the owners(stockholders) or by investing in the company creating growth.....if you tax them you are eliminating any of those three....and again...that money can be recovered later in those first two areas....

Last edited by DanS.; 10-15-2008 at 08:54 PM.
DanS. is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:54 PM   #96 (permalink)
Master of Quill-Fu
Points: 26,684, Level: 97 Points: 26,684, Level: 97 Points: 26,684, Level: 97
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
Heretic's Avatar
 
Space Invaders Champion! Pool Jam - 10 Minute Game Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Taylorsville, "Utahistan" [stuck in the 20th century]... Now can I have my foreign aid/bribe???
Posts: 9,664
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 78
Thanked 312 Times in 241 Posts
Heretic is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanS. View Post
I would be happier fining companies for polluting than increasing or decreasing their tax rates based on the level of pollution. It takes ALOT longer to get something like that through congress than it does to create an enforcement agency that can operate into perpetuity without the need to ask congress for every action that it takes. Alot like OSHA.
Actually no, you could provide enforcement through existing agencies. The EPA [with a rational appointee] would verify the lowered pollution and the IRS would enforce the tax end.
__________________
"In space no one can hear you scream. in D.C. it won't matter..." -Clinton Resurrection: The Alien Queen lives!
Heretic is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:56 PM   #97 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 2,312, Level: 29 Points: 2,312, Level: 29 Points: 2,312, Level: 29
Activity: 12% Activity: 12% Activity: 12%
 
leftparadise's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Coast......of Michigan
Posts: 523
My Mood:
Thanks: 44
Thanked 71 Times in 41 Posts
leftparadise is a normal PG member
why did McCain claim Palin knew anything about families with children with autism ??? her child is Down's Syndrome, last I heard. duh.

I nearly fell off the couch when McCain raved about how great his rally audiences were - has he seen the YouTube ??? oh, wait, that's on the computer, he couldn't have seen it.

And what was up with McCain's smile - creeeeeeeeepy
leftparadise is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:56 PM   #98 (permalink)
Administrator
Points: 27,203, Level: 97 Points: 27,203, Level: 97 Points: 27,203, Level: 97
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
 
DanS.'s Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 8,638
My Mood:
Thanks: 158
Thanked 356 Times in 264 Posts
DanS. is a spectacular PG memberDanS. is a spectacular PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heretic View Post
Actually no, you could provide enforcement through existing agencies. The EPA [with a rational appointee] would verify the lowered pollution and the IRS would enforce the tax end.
I would have no problem with the EPA enforcing the fines.

So you would prefer that worker safety issues were reflected in taxes as well as opposed to how it is now with fines levied by an agency?
DanS. is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:57 PM   #99 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 2,312, Level: 29 Points: 2,312, Level: 29 Points: 2,312, Level: 29
Activity: 12% Activity: 12% Activity: 12%
 
leftparadise's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: West Coast......of Michigan
Posts: 523
My Mood:
Thanks: 44
Thanked 71 Times in 41 Posts
leftparadise is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanS. View Post
I would have no problem with the EPA enforcing the fines.

So you would prefer that worker safety issues were reflected in taxes as well as opposed to how it is now with fines levied by an agency?
can we keep this thread about the debate ?
leftparadise is offline   Top
Old 10-15-2008, 08:58 PM   #100 (permalink)
SOG
Senior Member
Points: 1,285, Level: 19 Points: 1,285, Level: 19 Points: 1,285, Level: 19
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
SOG's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Where beer does flow and men chunder
Posts: 172
Thanks: 50
Thanked 27 Times in 25 Posts
SOG is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanS. View Post
I disagree...he's not as clear or on point as he usually is.

I'll take it a step farther and say if the debate cpntinues this way polls will show that McCain won.

That's my prediction.
I don't know at what point in the debate you posted this, but it was clearly an Obama win by the end.

McCains face said it all.
SOG is offline   Top
The Following User Says Thank You to SOG For This Useful Post:
 

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com General political and social discussion