PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Site Discussion > Election Center 2008
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-2007, 12:32 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 4,725, Level: 43 Points: 4,725, Level: 43 Points: 4,725, Level: 43
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
mudwhistle's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 949
Thanks: 178
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
mudwhistle is a normal PG member
Democrats admit using earmarks for re-election

Congressman Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) is calling for an immediate suspension of the earmarking process after learning that a House Democrat suggested to Speaker Nancy Pelosi that additional earmarks could assist the campaigns of vulnerable Democrats.

“Inherently, we understand that this earmark process is not equitable… There are a few examples of where your help could significantly assist a few members in highly contested races,” wrote Rep. Kilpatrick (Rep. Kilpatrick letter to Speaker Pelosi, 12/13/2007).

Want to ask Speaker Pelosi whether she believes granting earmarks to re-elect Democrats is ethical and an appropriate use of tax dollars? Give her a ring at 202-225-4965 and ask her.

http://www.freedomtalks.org/2007/12/...ical-purposes/
mudwhistle is offline   Top
Old 12-18-2007, 12:50 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 3,079, Level: 34 Points: 3,079, Level: 34 Points: 3,079, Level: 34
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
bigbrowndog's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 853
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bigbrowndog is a normal PG member
Oooooooo from a Reaganite's blog and all over the web

on repig sites ----how interesting, so fascinating.

Oh please do call Nancy--she's sitting there waiting just for you.
bigbrowndog is offline   Top
Old 12-18-2007, 01:14 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 3,079, Level: 34 Points: 3,079, Level: 34 Points: 3,079, Level: 34
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
bigbrowndog's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 853
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bigbrowndog is a normal PG member
Lobbyists are turning away from approps.

By Jim Snyder and Kevin Bogardus
December 18, 2007

Earmarks survived the changeover in Congress and Democratic pledges of reform, but several lobbying firms are starting to turn away from appropriations work in favor of new sources of revenue.

Lobbyists say a variety of factors have them rethinking business models built on what critics call pork-barrel spending.


Scandals involving former lobbyist Jack Abramoff and former Rep. Randy “Duke” Cunningham (R-Calif.) brought new and unwelcome scrutiny to directed spending projects.

That, in turn, has driven down the amount of money available.

“The days of getting $5 million for a start-up company are rapidly declining,” said one former Republican appropriations staffer who is now a lobbyist.

As Congress debated earmark reform, “most people in town pivoted away from that work,” the lobbyist said.

Cassidy & Associates, for example, proudly claims responsibility for adding the first earmark to a spending bill. In the years since, the firm has built its practice around convincing Congress to add targeted spending programs to appropriations bills.

More recently, however, the firm has shifted more of its business to policy issues that may offer more consistent revenues. Nearly 70 percent of the new work the firm attracts is tied to non-appropriations business.


MORE: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/lobbyists-are-turning-away-from-approps.-2007-12-18.html
bigbrowndog is offline   Top
Old 12-18-2007, 03:12 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 4,725, Level: 43 Points: 4,725, Level: 43 Points: 4,725, Level: 43
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
mudwhistle's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 949
Thanks: 178
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
mudwhistle is a normal PG member
So much for those claims to get rid of corruption and be the most ethical Congress ever.
mudwhistle is offline   Top
Old 12-18-2007, 03:15 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senhor Member
Points: 22,622, Level: 93 Points: 22,622, Level: 93 Points: 22,622, Level: 93
Activity: 97% Activity: 97% Activity: 97%
 
Kanadesaga's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NYS - Devil's country
Posts: 7,253
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 6
Thanks: 235
Thanked 105 Times in 76 Posts
Kanadesaga is a famous PG member
And the Bridge to Nowhere in Alaska wasn't about getting Ted Stevens re-elected?
__________________
Bill has the Blues
Saturdays
10 pm to 1am est
www.whws.fm
Kanadesaga is offline   Top
Old 12-18-2007, 03:33 PM   #6 (permalink)
suggestive human
Points: 4,904, Level: 44 Points: 4,904, Level: 44 Points: 4,904, Level: 44
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Elliott's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Los Angeles (Westwood)
Posts: 1,080
My Mood:
Thanks: 25
Thanked 32 Times in 21 Posts
Elliott is a famous PG member
Would you be kind enough to post some proof?
__________________
Elliott is offline   Top
 

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com General political and social discussion