PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Site Discussion > Election Center 2008
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2008, 09:43 PM   #111 (permalink)
Senior Member
Points: 23,413, Level: 94 Points: 23,413, Level: 94 Points: 23,413, Level: 94
Activity: 8% Activity: 8% Activity: 8%
 
CosmicRocker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: lost in a lost world
Posts: 8,052
My Mood:
Thanks: 144
Thanked 109 Times in 87 Posts
CosmicRocker is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mithrall View Post
The same bunch of pricks who were throwing dog crap at returning soldiers from Vietnam because it was the "IN" thing to do, are now trying to outdo each other in proving how they care about our soldiers in Iraq. They are so afraid of "appearing" that they don't care about our troops that they keep giving Bush blank checks for military operations in Iraq. Sorry about the broad brush, some of the ideals behind the hippie movement were admirable, but some of what the hippie generation did to our soldiers returning from Vietnam was pretty dispicable. Troops that were DRAFTED and didn't really have much of a choice in the matter.
I won't even respond - you take stories of isolated incidents and do INDEED paint a broad brush.
Fiction becomes fact if you repeat the same hyperboyle over and over.

Do you think The Vietnam Veterans against the War acted that way?
We were brothers.
It was a time of extreme radicalism, so there was radical behavior by some few.
I never saw it, and i was in quite a few demonsrations

The majority of the anti-war movement embraced the soldiers with a welcome home, and vented the hatred towards the NixonWarpigs. " Peace Now"
__________________

Traveling Wilburys (l to r)

Bob Dylan, Jeff Lynne, Tom Petty, George Harrison, Roy Orbison
CosmicRocker is offline   Top
Old 03-05-2008, 03:40 AM   #112 (permalink)
BigPictureist
Points: 12,894, Level: 74 Points: 12,894, Level: 74 Points: 12,894, Level: 74
Activity: 54% Activity: 54% Activity: 54%
 
PursuitOfHappinessParty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Posts: 4,572
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 217
Thanked 185 Times in 143 Posts
PursuitOfHappinessParty is a spectacular PG memberPursuitOfHappinessParty is a spectacular PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kana View Post
I won't vote for Hillary either, and it really comes down to her vote for the War. Oh, I know, I know... She didn't vote for the war, she merely voted to authorise the war, which is completely different. She is running on the premise that she has experience and her judgement has been tested. Unfortunately, her judgement flunked the Iraq test. For that reason alone I believe she is unqualified to be President.
She is also tied to corporatism with her association with Wal-Mart. She was very supportive of her husband with NAFTA and corporations being given a much freer rein when it came to media ownership. Big boon to private insurance companies with that lobby friendly UHC package, too. Her record in dealing with Bush from the Hill is deplorable for someone wishing to be my 'Lead Citizen'.

Quote:
I won't vote for McCain, either, and I'm sceptical of Obama.
For good reasons. Obama is the big spending creature of the far left that will give Republicans all the excuses they need. McCain is a NeoCon puppet, but compared to the last two Republican presidents he's no unilateralist nor is he controlled by the party. Pretty bleak either choice.

Quote:
I'll probably go third party.
The most sensible thing anyone's said all day. I am a registered Independent. Flirted with Libertarian Party in the early 90s, but they went too corporate and anti-citizen for my taste. I feel the Green Party is also too much of an embodiment of big spending, but I am an old Nader fan. Unfortunately, he's a couple elections too late, and like McCain he's too old at 74. Maybe I'll write in Bloomberg just to annoy both the Dems and the GOP. Maybe it'll make Diebold select Robin Williams in a glitch.
__________________
" Tie two birds together and though they have four wings they cannot fly " Blind Master in 'Circle Of Iron'
PursuitOfHappinessParty is offline   Top
Old 03-05-2008, 07:48 AM   #113 (permalink)
Still here :P
Points: 2,839, Level: 32 Points: 2,839, Level: 32 Points: 2,839, Level: 32
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Noob920's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Eastern United States
Posts: 969
My Mood:
Thanks: 23
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Noob920 is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by StillNoScript View Post
That's it.

And, you can call it sour grapes. But I'd have to tell you, there wouldn't be any sour grapes from my end if there wasn't pretentious and borderline racist bullshit coming from the end of Hillary supporters.

They've called us naive.

They've called us children (despite all of us being adults).

They've accused us of playing the race card, for merely mentioning race (when Hillary has been playing the gender card her entire political life...)

They've mocked us to no end for having dreams of change in Washington.

I've had it to here. I'm writing Barack Obama in, rather he's on the ballot or not, in November.

I know I won't be alone. I know there are a lot of Obama supporters that have had to endure this pretentious bullshit from these aging know it all hippies for the past year.

Also, considering Hillary is obviously bullshitting us on Iraq and will certainly keep us there just as McCain would, how much worse would a vote for McCain be than a vote for Hillary?
That is certainly your choice. As an AMERICAN, you have that choice.
__________________
Originally Posted by BillCosby

I am usually a nice easy going person........ Although ever time I drive by that bar my Xwife cheated on me @ I get a bit troubled.........

But I am sure that is not the reason I kick that damn dog after........

Seems like he deserves it when I take that route home......
Noob920 is offline   Top
Old 03-05-2008, 09:37 AM   #114 (permalink)
strange brew
Points: 6,719, Level: 53 Points: 6,719, Level: 53 Points: 6,719, Level: 53
Activity: 17% Activity: 17% Activity: 17%
 
gonzo's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: woods
Posts: 1,809
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 84
Thanked 69 Times in 45 Posts
gonzo is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by PursuitOfHappinessParty View Post
She was very supportive of her husband with NAFTA...
"Clinton would end the tax breaks that exist in the tax code for outsourcing jobs and have trade agreements with enforceable labor and environmental standards."

Credit: CNN Issues: Election Center 2008 - CNN.com

Last edited by gonzo; 03-05-2008 at 10:00 AM.
gonzo is offline   Top
Old 03-05-2008, 03:45 PM   #115 (permalink)
BigPictureist
Points: 12,894, Level: 74 Points: 12,894, Level: 74 Points: 12,894, Level: 74
Activity: 54% Activity: 54% Activity: 54%
 
PursuitOfHappinessParty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Posts: 4,572
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 217
Thanked 185 Times in 143 Posts
PursuitOfHappinessParty is a spectacular PG memberPursuitOfHappinessParty is a spectacular PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzo View Post
"Clinton would end the tax breaks that exist in the tax code for outsourcing jobs and have trade agreements with enforceable labor and environmental standards."

Credit: CNN Issues: Election Center 2008 - CNN.com
Maybe. Unless Wal-Mart needs more cheap products. This stance won't include NAFTA. Also doesn't address furthering corporate domination in the media. Don't see any chance of election reform, either. Haven't heard any Clinton talk tough about China.

Just sayin'.........
__________________
" Tie two birds together and though they have four wings they cannot fly " Blind Master in 'Circle Of Iron'
PursuitOfHappinessParty is offline   Top
Old 03-06-2008, 08:55 AM   #116 (permalink)
Extraterrestrial
Points: 5,889, Level: 49 Points: 5,889, Level: 49 Points: 5,889, Level: 49
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
OldManOnFire's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,633
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
OldManOnFire is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by PursuitOfHappinessParty View Post
Maybe. Unless Wal-Mart needs more cheap products. This stance won't include NAFTA. Also doesn't address furthering corporate domination in the media. Don't see any chance of election reform, either. Haven't heard any Clinton talk tough about China.

Just sayin'.........
I frequently find it so interesting how so many people talk so disparagingly about China. And although there are many exporters to the US, we seem to believe it all comes only from China?

Regarding Wal-Mart...they would not exist, nor would they be the largest retailer in the world, without you and me and hundreds of millions more people shopping there--this is a fact Jack!!

Stupid Americans complain all the time about China or outsourcing taking jobs from the USA, but give 99% of the Americans a choice to buy something made in China for $7.99 or the same item crafted in the USA that sells for $15.00, they buy the cheaper item.

US people perpetuate imports because this gives us more choices and lower prices. No one is holding a gun to our heads when we make our weekly trek into Wal-Mart or any other store selling imports!

There are American-made products everywhere, and because of our high cost of labor and materials, the cost on these items are very high...too high for the average guy to afford.

This issue IS NOT ABOUT WAL-MART, it's about American shopping habits. I wish Wal-Mart, and K-Mart and Target would close for about three months and let all the whiny-babies pay full price for everything. Perhaps this will make everyone happy?

But then I realize that people who complain all the time, especially those who wish to always blame someone else for everything, will never ever ever ever be happy...
__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...
OldManOnFire is offline   Top
Old 03-06-2008, 09:08 AM   #117 (permalink)
BigPictureist
Points: 12,894, Level: 74 Points: 12,894, Level: 74 Points: 12,894, Level: 74
Activity: 54% Activity: 54% Activity: 54%
 
PursuitOfHappinessParty's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Posts: 4,572
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 217
Thanked 185 Times in 143 Posts
PursuitOfHappinessParty is a spectacular PG memberPursuitOfHappinessParty is a spectacular PG member
OMOF;
To paraphrase John Adams, there is a difference between profits and profiteering. Wal-Mart wouldn't exist if they didn't use predatory prices and you know it. They can offer selection and pricing that local retailers can't match. This is profiteering, a gambit used by corporations that hides as profits instead. Akin to monopoly, corporations use unrealistic clout. Once the market share is centered upon the Wal-marts, what's going to happen to that selection and prices? Wal-Mart prices already don't look as competitive as they did in the 80's when they were carpet-bagging local retailers, does it? I don't know about your Wal-Mart experiences, but I notice in small towns that once the competition is gone, the selection in the Wal-Mart becomes selective. Notice they keep making more rooms, and thus have less room, for new ventures to drive out yet more local retailers: tires, salons, eye exams, eyewear, florist, grocery, bank, McDonald, and?
As to China, it's a great example due to volume. Great example for use of comparing safety and consumer issues too. But the story stays the same whichever nation with impoverished people you use. Nike even downgraded their wage needs by switching to communist slave labor in RVN. Give the people no real choice and then blame them for choosing. Outsourcing, BTW, often is done at the price of foreign slave labor and unfair wage differences. Level the playing field there with true import taxation and tarriffs and then you can play the 'blame the consumer' game. For you corporatists, this stale argument didn't fare any better when you tried them on Nader in the 70s and 80s.
__________________
" Tie two birds together and though they have four wings they cannot fly " Blind Master in 'Circle Of Iron'
PursuitOfHappinessParty is offline   Top
Old 03-06-2008, 10:47 AM   #118 (permalink)
Mediator for the Messes
Points: 7,337, Level: 56 Points: 7,337, Level: 56 Points: 7,337, Level: 56
Activity: 12% Activity: 12% Activity: 12%
 
winthrop's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,431
Thanks: 36
Thanked 116 Times in 86 Posts
winthrop is a famous PG member
You only left out Wal Mart's practices toward it employees, and the fact that it is often the only retail employer hiring in a particular region after its monopolistic scouring of competition.
winthrop is offline   Top
Old 03-06-2008, 01:27 PM   #119 (permalink)
Extraterrestrial
Points: 5,889, Level: 49 Points: 5,889, Level: 49 Points: 5,889, Level: 49
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
OldManOnFire's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,633
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
OldManOnFire is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by PursuitOfHappinessParty View Post
OMOF;
To paraphrase John Adams, there is a difference between profits and profiteering. Wal-Mart wouldn't exist if they didn't use predatory prices and you know it. They can offer selection and pricing that local retailers can't match. This is profiteering, a gambit used by corporations that hides as profits instead. Akin to monopoly, corporations use unrealistic clout. Once the market share is centered upon the Wal-marts, what's going to happen to that selection and prices? Wal-Mart prices already don't look as competitive as they did in the 80's when they were carpet-bagging local retailers, does it? I don't know about your Wal-Mart experiences, but I notice in small towns that once the competition is gone, the selection in the Wal-Mart becomes selective. Notice they keep making more rooms, and thus have less room, for new ventures to drive out yet more local retailers: tires, salons, eye exams, eyewear, florist, grocery, bank, McDonald, and?
As to China, it's a great example due to volume. Great example for use of comparing safety and consumer issues too. But the story stays the same whichever nation with impoverished people you use. Nike even downgraded their wage needs by switching to communist slave labor in RVN. Give the people no real choice and then blame them for choosing. Outsourcing, BTW, often is done at the price of foreign slave labor and unfair wage differences. Level the playing field there with true import taxation and tarriffs and then you can play the 'blame the consumer' game. For you corporatists, this stale argument didn't fare any better when you tried them on Nader in the 70s and 80s.
You are so off-base in your opinions on this that it is impossible for me to devote enough time to debate you. Sorry...
__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...
OldManOnFire is offline   Top
Old 03-06-2008, 01:37 PM   #120 (permalink)
Extraterrestrial
Points: 5,889, Level: 49 Points: 5,889, Level: 49 Points: 5,889, Level: 49
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
OldManOnFire's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,633
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
OldManOnFire is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by winthrop View Post
You only left out Wal Mart's practices toward it employees, and the fact that it is often the only retail employer hiring in a particular region after its monopolistic scouring of competition.
This is such BS and so is the entire Wal-Mart hater attitude. Too bad you cannot imagine the type of life many would have if all of us still lived in Mayberry RFD!!

Like I said before, I wish all the Wal-Mart type stores would close for three months and then we would see some real cry-babies...

BTW...Wal-Mart is opening 400 MEDICAL CLINICS in their stores and will expand as it makes sense. So if I could predict the future, I will know that in about two years, you and others will be blaming Wal-Mart for taking business from the current medical industry. It won't make any difference to you that millions will use this service, or that it will be cheaper than existing health care, or that the quality will be equal; you will find some way to twist their successes, and the qualities they bring to so many people's lives, into some cry-baby story about all that is wrong in this country. And not once will you or others fathom that all the problems that exist today are brought on by PEOPLE's behaviors, therefore, all the solutions lie with the PEOPLE. But I know for many it is much easier to blame everyone else for our ills rather than to take a good hard look in our mirrors...
__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...
OldManOnFire is offline   Top
 

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com General political and social discussion