PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Election Center 2008
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-12-2008, 07:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
The party of the pissed!!
 
BillCosby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,504
My Mood:
Thanks: 183
Thanked 119 Times in 92 Posts
BillCosby has disabled reputation
We've been saved: Senate Passes Bill to Expand U.S. Spying Powers

THis is disgusting....................

Did anyone hear Obama or hillary condemning this today??? I didn't????

WASHINGTON — After more than a year of heated political wrangling, the Senate handed the White House a major victory Tuesday by voting to broaden the government’s spy powers after giving legal protection to phone companies that cooperated in President Bush’s warrantless eavesdropping program.


The Senate rejected a series of amendments that would have restricted the government’s surveillance powers and eliminated immunity for the phone carriers, and it voted in convincing fashion — 69 to 29 — to end debate and bring the issue to a final vote. That vote on the overall billwas an almost identical 68 to 29.

The House has already rejected the idea of immunity for the phone companies, and Democratic leaders reacted angrily to the Senate vote. But Congressional officials said it appeared that the House would ultimately be forced to accept some sort of legal protection for the phone carriers in negotiations between the two chambers this week.

The Senate debate amounted to a proxy vote not only on the president’s warrantless wiretapping program, but also on a range of other issues that tested the president’s wartime authority, from secret detentions to wiretapping issues. The discussion in effect presaged the debate over national security that will play out this year in the presidential and congressional elections.

Senator Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut, who spoke on the Senate floor for more than 20 hours in an unsuccessful effort to stall the wiretapping bill, said the vote would be remembered by future generations as a test of whether the country heeds “the rule of law or the rule of men.”

But with Democrats defecting to the White House plan, he acknowledged that the national security issue had won the day in the Senate, even among many of his Democratic colleagues. “Unfortunately, those who are advocating this notion that you have to give up liberties to be more secure are apparently prevailing,” Mr. Dodd said. “They’re convincing people that we’re at risk either politically, or at risk as a nation.”

With resistance led by Mr. Dodd and Senators Russ Feingold of Wisconsin, critics of the administration’s plan argued that it effectively rewarded phone companies by providing them with legal insulation for actions that violated longstanding law and their own fiduciary responsibilities to their customers. Immunity would protect the phone companies from some 40 lawsuits now pending that charge the firms broke the law by taking part in the program.

But supporters of the plan said the phone carriers acted out of patriotism after the Sept. 11 attacks in complying with what they believed in good faith was a legally binding order from the president. Republicans were able to garner the support of 19 Democrats and Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut. Democratic leaders charged that the tactics the Republicans used smacked of fear-mongering.

“This, I believe, is the right way to go for the security of the nation,” said Senator John D. Rockefeller IV, the West Virginia Democrat who leads the intelligence committee and who was a pivotal supporter of the White House-backed plan approved Tuesday.

Beyond the immunity provision, the Senate measure would also widen the executive branch’s surveillance powers by allowing the National Security Agency and intelligence agencies to use broad orders — without getting court orders in advance — to eavesdrop on groups of overseas targets, rather than using individualized warrants.
__________________
Preventive war is not war!!!!Counter-terror is not terror


http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b47/leagion/export.gif
BillCosby is offline   Top Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to BillCosby For This Useful Post:
Old 02-12-2008, 08:04 PM   #2 (permalink)
My Brain Hurts
 
Richterscale's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Spreading harmony thruout the Internetz
Posts: 947
My Mood:
Thanks: 19
Thanked 51 Times in 35 Posts
Richterscale is a famous PG member
This makes me sick. I know it won't do any good, but I wrote to every single fucking Democrat who caved into this anti American piece of shit bill.

The last chance to save us from this travesty is if the House holds fast with their version which doesn't contain blanket immunity.

This from TPM...

Quote:
Let there be no doubt: a majority of senators, and a large number of Democrats, think the telecoms should not suffer the hazard of accountability for cooperating with the administration’s warrantless wiretapping program. Sen. Chris Dodd (D-CT) took to the floor last night to give a speech asking, “This is our defining question, the question that confronts every generation: The rule of law, or the rule of men?” The resounding answer: the rule of men.

The Senate voted on the Dodd/Feingold amendment, which would have stripped retroactive immunity from the surveillance bill just now. The final tally was 31-67; crossing over to vote nay were Sens. Jay Rockefeller (D-WV), Evan Bayh (D-IA), Daniel Inouye (D-HI), Tim Johnson (D-SD), Herb Kohl (D-WI), Mary Landrieu (D-LA), Claire McCaskill (D-MO), Mark Pryor (D-AR), Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Ken Salazar (D-CO), Tom Carper (D-DE), Barbara Mikulski (D-MD), Jim Webb (D-VA), Ben Nelson (D-NE), Bill Nelson (D-FL), Kent Conrad (D-ND), and Debbie Stabenow (D-MI).
__________________
Google Sibel Edmonds

"How many people died from the Kama Sutra as opposed to the Bible? Who wins?" - Frank Zappa
Richterscale is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:15 PM   #3 (permalink)
Truth Lion
 
Jonesy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,554
Thanks: 10
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
Jonesy is a famous PG member
Every official who supported this should be sued for the maximum amount.

Again, it only reinforces the idea people should stop depending so much on government mandate. This practice, in itself, is one of the greatest of our countries failings. Ruled by the people, for the people... we have the constitution to protect us from any congressionally-supported atrocity.
Jonesy is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 08:30 PM   #4 (permalink)
Banned
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 436
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Black_Knight is going down hill
Anyway after we vote the connies out we can repeal this law and prosecute the telecom companies?
Black_Knight is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 07:45 AM   #5 (permalink)
My Brain Hurts
 
Richterscale's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Spreading harmony thruout the Internetz
Posts: 947
My Mood:
Thanks: 19
Thanked 51 Times in 35 Posts
Richterscale is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black_Knight View Post
Anyway after we vote the connies out we can repeal this law and prosecute the telecom companies?
I'm not sure. From everything I've read, no. And even if it were challenged in the Supreme Court, this court has been packed with pro-corporate ideologues, so I doubt a challenge would be successful.

Another reason why whether you like the Dem candidate or not, whoever gets picked will be making Supreme Court picks, so we have to think long term.
__________________
Google Sibel Edmonds

"How many people died from the Kama Sutra as opposed to the Bible? Who wins?" - Frank Zappa
Richterscale is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 07:51 AM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 949
Thanks: 178
Thanked 34 Times in 20 Posts
mudwhistle is a normal PG member
19 Democrats showed some sense for once. The rest want terrorists to be able to plot against the US in privacy.
mudwhistle is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 07:58 AM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,145
Thanks: 27
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
TrueBlueAmerican is a normal PG member
Id expect nothing less from the spineless democrats. Glad I left the party.
TrueBlueAmerican is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 08:25 AM   #8 (permalink)
Puddy Tat Watch
 
jdanton's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: NJ
Posts: 3,806
My Mood:
Thanks: 38
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
jdanton is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrueBlueAmerican View Post
Id expect nothing less from the spineless democrats. Glad I left the party.
19 out of 50?

This is why we need at least 60 democrats elected to the senate.

I'd also like some kind of open debate about this whole issue. If the government itself engages in illegal surveylance, and the government itself asks private companies to help, this raises some interesting questions.

Let's assume, for the sake of argument that all of this is investigated down the road, but Bush, Cheney, Gonzales, et al have been pardoned.

Would you then want to prosecute any private company who did what their government asked?

Why do 68 of our senators play so loosely with our constitutional rights?

It all makes me sick, too.

It's worth noting, however, that once again the republicans seem to have voted as a united group, while the dems were split 19 -31.

These same republicans will, if they have 41 senators next year, block any legislation they don't like.
__________________
Author: Memoirs of a Sleepless Mind, a book you CAN judge by its cover.
jdanton is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 09:06 AM   #9 (permalink)
My Brain Hurts
 
Richterscale's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Spreading harmony thruout the Internetz
Posts: 947
My Mood:
Thanks: 19
Thanked 51 Times in 35 Posts
Richterscale is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
19 Democrats showed some sense for once. The rest want terrorists to be able to plot against the US in privacy.
Once again, Mud, you fail to grasp any reality outside of Rush's talking points.
__________________
Google Sibel Edmonds

"How many people died from the Kama Sutra as opposed to the Bible? Who wins?" - Frank Zappa
Richterscale is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 09:34 AM   #10 (permalink)
The party of the pissed!!
 
BillCosby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,504
My Mood:
Thanks: 183
Thanked 119 Times in 92 Posts
BillCosby has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdanton View Post
19 out of 50?

This is why we need at least 60 democrats elected to the senate.

I'd also like some kind of open debate about this whole issue. If the government itself engages in illegal surveylance, and the government itself asks private companies to help, this raises some interesting questions.

Let's assume, for the sake of argument that all of this is investigated down the road, but Bush, Cheney, Gonzales, et al have been pardoned.

Would you then want to prosecute any private company who did what their government asked?

Why do 68 of our senators play so loosely with our constitutional rights?

It all makes me sick, too.

It's worth noting, however, that once again the republicans seem to have voted as a united group, while the dems were split 19 -31.

These same republicans will, if they have 41 senators next year, block any legislation they don't like.

SOme good points..................

But I am not hearing any of these companies being forced to do this either............ Why are they not speaking out against this either???

I have no doubt that those looking back on this & similar crimes will condemn them as cowardly acts.....

I have little doubt that thee criminals will go free.......... THey always seem to find ways around pulling time...........

History on the other hand will not be as kind & these dark days for our democracy will be looked upon w/ sorrow & these criminals & their legacies w/ disdain..............
__________________
Preventive war is not war!!!!Counter-terror is not terror


http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b47/leagion/export.gif
BillCosby is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher