PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Site Discussion > Election Center 2008
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-10-2008, 11:59 AM   #1 (permalink)
punk nun
Points: 27,220, Level: 97 Points: 27,220, Level: 97 Points: 27,220, Level: 97
Activity: 18% Activity: 18% Activity: 18%
 
itsmeeeeeee's Avatar
 
Mahjong Connect Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 53 miles west of venus
Posts: 4,192
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 251
Thanked 803 Times in 484 Posts
itsmeeeeeee is a famous PG member
clinton points out that even pledged delegates aren't bound to election

March 10, 2008
Clinton notes pledged delegates aren't bound to a candidate
Posted: 08:27 AM ET

Clinton noted Sunday pledged delegates can still vote for whomever they choose.



(CNN) — In a new interview, Hillary Clinton again seems to raise the prospect that "pledged" delegates - those awarded based on election results - might still be considered up for grabs..
"There are elected delegates, caucus delegates and superdelegates, all for different reasons, and they're all equal in their ability to cast their vote for whomever they choose," she told Newsweek in an interview published Sunday. "Even elected and caucus delegates are not required to stay with whomever they are pledged to."

[another quote from the same interview:

TPM Election Central | Talking Points Memo |

"Even elected and caucus delegates are not required to stay with whomever they are pledged to. This is a very carefully constructed process that goes back years, and we're going to follow the process."]


After a similar reference earlier this year drew sharp criticism from Obama supporters, the Clinton campaign said that they had not been planning to try to actively convince the Illinois senator's pledged delegates to switch sides, and would not do so in the future.



so, as usual, hillary's tongue is tied in the middle and waggin' on both ends...

question is, which side of hillary's mouth should people believe?
__________________

Shakin' up America, ONE vote at a time!
YES WE DID!!!!



itsmeeeeeee is online now   Top
Old 03-10-2008, 01:13 PM   #2 (permalink)
Truth Lion
Points: 6,748, Level: 53 Points: 6,748, Level: 53 Points: 6,748, Level: 53
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
 
Jonesy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,554
Thanks: 10
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
Jonesy is a famous PG member
They try to manipulate the slant... it's all bullshit. We should be talking about the issues, not 'who might be able to win, and why'. I want to hear them talk more about this health-care thing... see who can make the most progress on the issue in the shortest period of time (while simultaneously handling many other issues, per reality).
Jonesy is offline   Top
 

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com General political and social discussion