![]() |
|
Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| Share PG | Forum | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Mark Forums Read |
| Sponsors |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Mediator for the Messes
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 37
Thanked 118 Times in 88 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Ms. Clinton's stories have been increasingly absurd, and those are worthy of examination. Her private relationship with her husband is not, was not ten years ago and is even less so now, any more than anyone else's relationship, worthy of public scrutiny. That matter is nothing compared to Mr. Bush's actions while in office. Mr. McCain may be a bit more dignified and perhaps less used car salesman about continuing the Bush Cabal policies, he may continue them for different reasons, but the disastrous results will not be abated. |
|||||||||||
|
|
Top |
|
|
#12 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Master of Quill-Fu
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Taylorsville, "Utahistan" [stuck in the 20th century]... Now can I have my foreign aid/bribe???
Posts: 9,716
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 10
Thanks: 78
Thanked 317 Times in 245 Posts
![]() |
It's more than that. Biden as the top half of the ticket is the more logical, more probable and more electable answer. Edwards' own legal background would cast too many long shadows into his campaign. Granted Edwards' legal practice isn't as infamous as Hillary's but it's not squeaky clean either.
Quote:
We'll talk about election rules when those rules mean anything.
__________________
|
|||||||||
|
|
Top |
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Senior Member
![]()
|
Quote:
HOWEVER, comma, I couldn't disagree more about Bill Clinton's serial infidelity and Mrs. Bill Clinton's complicity. It was not only literally the public's business to whatever extent in occupied national resources, it continues to speak to CHARACTER today. I remember when MintJulep tra-la-la'd that Giuliani's mondo-bizarre twist on Infidelity in Office would be a "non-issue." That word exactly, s/he used. I said I would devote time, energy, money and skill to MAKING infidelity an issue. It speaks DIRECTLY to character. I am committed through November...I neither withdrew nor suspended my campaign to rid my government of tawdry, hypocritical, unethical opportunists.
__________________
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= *©2008 Implausible Endeavors LLC ImplausibleEndeavors.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
|||||||||
|
|
Top |
|
|
#14 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
punk nun
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 53 miles west of venus
Posts: 4,192
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 251
Thanked 803 Times in 484 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
agreed re: bill and hill i, too, agree that the personal escapades of elected officials really should be off limits, if they don't break laws. but that's the rub. technically, clinton perjured himself. and hillary went on public record with lies to support that perjury. these are the legitimate questions for the voters to be concerned about. the fact that the personal acts in question were actually nobody's business doesn't absolve them of what snared bill (and hillary!) in their very own web. the relevant issue here is the lying that followed the blow jobs - not the blow jobs, themselves. it's the lies, stupid. the constant propensity to lie, lie, lie. and THAT DOES go back to their terms in the WH.
__________________
Shakin' up America, ONE vote at a time! YES WE DID!!!! |
|||||||||
|
|
Top |
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Mediator for the Messes
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 37
Thanked 118 Times in 88 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
Perhaps he is a slobbering predator, unable to maintain a platonic relationship with any woman, and perhaps she is a blindly ambitious power monger who will overlook any humiliation to achieve her nefarious goals. Perhaps sex is of little interest to her, and perhaps it is of excessive interest to him. Perhaps they have a private understanding wherein he may pursue any strumpet who will have him, as long as he leaves Ms. Clinton alone. If the latter situation concerned our neighbors, it would be considered a private personal matter, and none of anyone else's concern. Since these people act on the world stage we seem to consider it important. Ms. Clinton is humiliated, if she is, because the world pays attention to her personal issues. If the situation is reflected in the former scenario, some may consider that cause for concern, but there is other ample evidence to examine, more relevant to everyone, without speculating about this couple's most intimate motivations. For example, I consider Ms. Clinton's willingness to tell an obvious, provable lie about an event which could affect us all (Bosnian misadventure) more disturbing than her willingness to overlook her husband's sexual interests. On the latter subject, I agree with Chelsea Clinton. It is none of our business. |
|||||||||
|
|
Top |
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Mediator for the Messes
![]()
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,442
Thanks: 37
Thanked 118 Times in 88 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
|
|||||||||
|
|
Top |
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Remedial
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: The Secret City
Posts: 727
My Mood:
Thanks: 66
Thanked 96 Times in 65 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
Its to bad cause I was a big Biden supporter, less edwards (I didn't like alot of his policies) |
|||||||||
|
|
Top |
|
|
#18 (permalink) | ||||||||
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,872
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 14 Times in 14 Posts
![]() |
I rather see the perfect electorate and not the dumbed-down knee-jerk media-hyped one we're stuck with. I am once again thoroughly disgusted with the "choices" we've had thrusted upon us. It's a fucking circus. When are the Dems going to stop trying to prove how righteous they are and pick a candidate with the proper credentials?
|
||||||||
|
|
Top |
|
|
#19 (permalink) | |||||||||
|
Senior Member
![]()
|
Quote:
Last year, for the first time in over a decade, I was made to feel that my accountant had assumed an adversarial role in the tax compliance process. I can be thin-skinned and hyper-sensitive, prone to imagine slights right along with the most neurotic of them, but this isn't one of those times. Differences in demands and treatment were inarguably present from previous years. And a significantly higher preparation fee. That is a whole other story, to which I have every intention of returning. One aspect is that, unbeknownst to me, my accountant filed for an extension...the first in my adult life. I have filed a tax return since I was in high school, I think. Didn't we have to file an EZPZ return if we had part-time jobs? Regardless, my first extension. I had intended to replace my accountant between then and now, but I am OVERWHELMED by the burdens placed upon me by my government and the handful of Big Monied interests who control my chief expenses, both of whom seek to rip me off at every turn. Both of them. I am so far behind, I despair of ever catching up...while Government Officials lead lives featuring expense-paid travel, hob-nobbing with big shots and celebrities, guaranteed salaries, lifetime security. And let us not forget the thing they seem most to relish, they get to be on TV. I went without a TV for over a year. I pressed a wrong button on one of two remotes that are required to have television reception in an apartment that is less than one-quarter of the size of the home in which I formerly lived and...scratchy scratchy snowy snowy...one press of one wrong button and I am rendered without news. That would be the day AFTER the Hewlett Packard all-in-one read that, all-on-the-fritz contraption that has caused me NOTHING BUT GRIEF since I bought it on sale quit scanning mid-ridiculous-waste-of-taxpayer-money IRS letter advising that the check WILL be in the mail. And that would be the day BEFORE I got a ticket for parking on the cleaning day for third-world-caliber streets. I am welcome to pay someone $75/hour, however, to come fix the problems. It could run over an hour, he warns me. I've fucking had it. I have requested that my accountant, who is again pressured and ALSO running behind, due to the many new lines for HIM to tow, again file an extension on my behalf. I am not doing any filing OR PAYING of taxes by April 15th. As far as I can attest, with all manner of documentation, my government has done NOT ONE FUCKING THING FOR ME THIS MILLENNIUM. I'm DONE paying for nothing. Like the Bastards and Robber Barons keep telling US, there's no such thing as a free lunch. These are quintessentially American concepts and commitments: You don't get something for nothing. You get what you pay for. No taxation without representation. NOTHING is what I am getting. NOTHING is what I will give in return. If we can have a moratorium on foreclosures and bail out of Bear Stearns, I submit that I have just causes to likewise be granted relief. Such is the case I will plead. Like any other Lobbyist, Defendant, Lawyer, Politico or Money Man. SOMEONE'S GOT SOME FUCKING 'SPLAINING TO DO. ImpendBlog
__________________
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= *©2008 Implausible Endeavors LLC ImplausibleEndeavors.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= |
|||||||||
|
|
Top |
| Sponsors |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|