Op Ed Why the "Math" doesn't matter! - Page 8

RK77 · 05-16-2008, 12:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius

You could have done that a lot more graciously than that, considering I gave you a chance by specifically asking, "why that particular date." but I'll leave it at that with you on the subject.

And you could have produced this right up front instead of being as asshole since my choice of date had jack shit with you producing the information. But---I'll leave it at that......

RK77 · 05-16-2008, 12:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius

And Shee....you asked for an even closer date in Febuary.....so I really just couldn't believe you guys were really making it this easy for me with such outrage.

Why do lowlife losers always push their luck? The fact that she said this after michigan and I gave you the date for florida and not MI---does not change the fact that she is a self serving losing skank and those who are supporting her at this point are STUPID amoral losers without an ounce of integrity or decency. Buy a calculator!

SHE LOSES even if she gets Florida and michigan counted.

The MOST that she gets is something else to bitch about.

RK77 · 05-16-2008, 12:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius

RK, there may be some confusion on what the "Title" selections under "Post new thread" are to be be used as. I do not see a "Blog" selection. I just assumed if I wanted to make my own Op Ed (as many Op Ed pieces in News paper are not just part of the Editorial staff. I see Op Ed as where you can even post your own original Op Ed.

From Wiki;

An editorial, leader (UK), or leading article (UK) is an article in a newspaper or magazine that expresses the opinion of the editor, editorial board, or publisher.

An op-ed, abbreviated from opposite editorial due to the tradition of newspapers placing such materials on the page opposite the editorial page, is similar in form and content to an editorial, but represents the opinion of an individual writer, who is sometimes but not always affiliated with the publication. Though these two terms are sometimes confused, they are quite distinct.

Dip---the ONLY question was did you write the poorly written bullshit that started this thread. The practice here is for people to use the TITLE op ed to indicate that they are posting a legitimate writers opinion from an OP ED source. RANT is there for assholes who want to bitch or post misinformation.

But frankly, I could give a damn. I figured when I got to the 8th or 9th factual error ---(I am being civil and not just calling it a bold face lie) --- that you wrote it. There are only a few people as dishonest as you are. It was easy to narrow down.

RK77 · 05-16-2008, 12:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius

I thought the scab remark was uncalled for. The two candidates are not unions workers on strike and Hillary did not have to do the same as anyone else. I happen to think that Obama and Edwards effectivly turned their back on those two states and I am proud that Hillary did not.

I thought it was uncalled for too. What was called for was "grade A political whore".

Quote:

Screw Biden!

That seems reasonable now doesn't it.

Quote:

No matter how heated this or any other debate, discussion or....brawl here goes, It's nice to know we have members here who stick to and honor their words. Thank You.

PLEASE don't pretend that honor or honesty or truth or accuracy are traits that you pay more than lip service to. You have already far too much evidence to the contrary.

RK77 · 05-16-2008, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius

As a former union shop steward, no. There is no "in effect" and the incorrect use if the word was for Mr. Biden's on drama and effect. Hillary is not a scab and she did the RIGHT thing.

Lying is the right thing? Is that how you see it? Not supporting the party is the right thing? The other candidates illustrated that they supported the Democratic party-- the grand Hillho BEGAN this process saying "fuck the party" and has not stopped yet!

RK77 · 05-16-2008, 12:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius

By remaining off the ticket Obama has done nothing to be punished for, but will have to face the consequences of his removing his name.

You believe there should be "consequences" for this? That says a lot about you doesn't it.......

Quote:

The thing here is.....the DNC attempted to pressure the candidates into actions as NOT defined by rules set forth in any form or function.

Provide the evidence of the "pressure" the DNC was attempting. Or are you back to your rampant lying AGAIN!

Quote:

They were changing the rules. They had already announced in August that the two states were in violation and what the consequences were.

Bullshit! In August or sept the states had hearings and were given the opportunity to formulate a corrective plan. They told them what the consequences WOULD BE if they chose to fail to comply!

Quote:

They then attempted even more consequences to these two states by attempting to get candidates to not participate in a US democratic process by calling it against the rules and possibly illegal. Is it.

What are you talking about????? There is NOTHING illegal about the party setting and enforcing it's own rules---as the courts have illustrated! Why do you LIE so incessantly???

Quote:

Or is it just in violation of party rules. If it is illegal, than courts can and will over turn any decision that seats Michigan delegates.

Jesus Christ --- you really have not even followed this issue have you? WHY are you talking about something you know nothing about??

Quote:

But as it stands the removal of names from ballot was not a part of any DNC rule.

And there is no rule or law that says you have to wipe your ass either---but decent people do, disabled people get assistance, and skanks don't!

The fact that people like you have to be TOLD what is decent or fair is EXACTLY why Hillary is losing!! No one wants a president who will walk around stinking up everything unless someone passes a LAW telling her what to do!

This is an absense of a moral compass! Should someone have passed a LAW telling the Hillho to read the intelligence BEFORE she sanctioned the deaths of 100's of thousands of people too?

See-----there are people who have internal moral compasses and they TRY to do the right thing (without laws or rules). THEY are president material.

Then there are SKANKY POLITICAL WHORES who believe that winning justifies any and everything ---even murder. And those people know that there are people who have NO MORAL COMPASS either--that is why they run for office.

Quote:

Obama should not receive full benefit of that election and as it stands, non decided vote was less than decided and Hillary name being the only one gave many a sense of "No other" choice, but they also knew it was just THEIR choices not the rest of the country and knew Obama was still in the race.

WRONG AGAIN----brainless wonder!! Kucinich was on the Michigan ballot!

Quote:

The DNC tried to stop the election going forward. Florida law stoped that attempt there and Clinton had a precedent set by that to which to answer to and defend.

The DNC tried to "stop" an "election"?

A primary is NOT an election. The DNC did not try to "stop" anything. Provide any evidence of this lie also please.

For you to feel the need to make up as much shit as you have here to defend a political whore's persisting in taking money from people SHE SAYS are too poor to afford such a wasted effort is one of the most degenerate acts I have seen in a while.

But----since you WANT DESPARATELY to defend her fleecing of innocent people----at least do so with FACTS not LIES!!

Provide evidence!

MarkMiller · 05-16-2008, 02:24 AM

05-16-2008, 02:24 AM	#77 (permalink)
MarkMiller Dr. Zaius, Mark M. Archery 2000 Champion! Join Date: Oct 2007 Posts: 4,235 Thanks: 69 Thanked 40 Times in 33 Posts
	Top

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode