PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Election Center 2008
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2008, 10:35 PM   #31 (permalink)
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,586
Blog Entries: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 48 Times in 35 Posts
cheapseats is a famous PG member
Originally Posted by itsmeeeeeee
Led by Boomer-aged women, the group, Clinton Supporters Count Too, is holding a press conference in Columbus at noon to release this statement.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonesy View Post
Raging hippy feminists. What more must one know? A completely objective group, i'm certain.

You betray your youth.

Here's the reality. It doesn't matter how passionate is this new coalition of youth voters. The Baby Boom generation is larger.

What defined block of voters is larger than the Baby Boom girls grown up? They will be dismissed as raging hippy feminists (please tell me it's a typo and not a jab) at a candidate's peril, I can promise you that.

Lotta those Baby Boomer men are established. Kids are gone off to college, they're cool. They can retire sooner than later if need or pleasure be. They are not prepared to be taxed at 50%, I can promise you that too. They won't stand for it. Like me, they'll leave.

SEPARATELY from the racist and muslim swiftboating, Barack Obama will be NAILED as a Tax & Spend Democrat, the most liberal one in Congress.

In the same way that racism will influence votes, so will wallet. They can't say it often enough on CNN that the economy is Issue Number One. Talking hope and change is one thing...it's free, for starters. When it comes to how all that hope and change is going to affect the individual's bottom line, well, there's how a person says they'll vote and there's how a person actually votes.

The dollar is almighty in America. Barack Obama cannot execute his agenda without tax hikes, and it won't be only on CEO's. It has to be considered that at least some of the undecideds will balk and that some of the supporters will bail. NO ONE is in the mood to pay higher taxes.
__________________
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
*©2008 Implausible Endeavors LLC
ImplausibleEndeavors.com
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Last edited by cheapseats; 05-15-2008 at 11:08 PM.
cheapseats is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 10:44 PM   #32 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 658
Thanked 186 Times in 130 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRS112 View Post
I think what they're saying is that society is sexist....so they're going to take it out on Obmam

They are hypocritical sore losers. If you go to one of the Hillho web sites---I forget which one---they have a compilation of all the blatantly sexist remarks that have been made by the pundits.

There problem is that Fox news made about 90% of them but these women are so desparate for attention at this point they are willing to do every executive at Fox to get heard!
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 10:46 PM   #33 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 658
Thanked 186 Times in 130 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsmeeeeeee View Post
May 15, 2008
Categories: Hillary Clinton

Ben Smith's Blog: Clinton backer backlash - Politico.com

Clinton backer backlash

My colleague Beth Frerking reports on something we're likely to hear a lot more about in coming days: Grumblings from the almost-half of the party, disproportionately women, whose candidate is losing.

An Ohio-based group of Democratic Hillary Clinton supporters say they’ll work actively against Sen. Barack Obama if he becomes the nominee, arguing that Clinton has been the subject of “intense sexism” by party leaders and the media.

Led by Boomer-aged women, the group, Clinton Supporters Count Too, is holding a press conference in Columbus at noon to release this statement.

Organizers Cynthia Ruccia, 55, and Jamie Dixey, 57, both from the Columbus area, say they’re coordinating women, men, minorities, union members and others in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida and Michigan – all important swing states next November – to impress upon Democratic party leaders what they think has been outright discrimination – and not of the racial kind.

“We have been vigilant against expressions of racism, and we are thrilled that the society has advanced that way” in accepting Obama as a serious candidate,” Ruccia said. “But it’s been open season on women, and we feel we need to stand up and make a statement about that, because it’s wrong.”

With growing calls for Clinton to leave the race, she said, women feel like “we’re being told to sit down, shut up, and get with the program.”

Hard to know what to make of any given group, but the sentiment is clearly out there, and putting the party back together will be Obama's, and Clinton's, challenge.

Oh, and they're doing O'Reilly tonight, of course.


-----------------------------------------------------


INTENSE SEXISM?

REALLY?


can ANYONE post ONE example of obama's intense sexism?
OR ANY EXAMPLE OF SEXISM AT ALL?


this is complete horseshit!
these are the kind of women who give women a bad name!
Yeah---- and maybe they be as successful with this effort as they were at getting Hillary the nomination!

Could it be that their energy has been misplaced all along?
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 10:49 PM   #34 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 658
Thanked 186 Times in 130 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsmeeeeeee View Post
and naturally, they run straight to fox!

if it's not one thing, it's 100 others!
whaaaaah, whaaaaah, whaaaaah!

hillary BETTER fix this shit!
god knows she's played every "ist" card in the book!
i can still hear bill whining "they're pickin' on a girl!"
what was that she said a couple of weeks ago?
"if you can't stand the heat, you better stay out of the kitchen?"

Hillary has played every sexist card she could. She has sold her sex more shamelessly than a street walker does.

But I suppose it's fair game for these ladies to do what they want to do.

There are organizations forming to prepare to finalize a kibbosh on Hillary's political career. Having women like this out there will encourage the formation of many, many, many more!
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 10:53 PM   #35 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 658
Thanked 186 Times in 130 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by mudwhistle View Post
You people accuse anyone who dares to say anything critical of your messiah Obama of being motivated by racism.

They are doing the same thing. Accusing those who say anything critical of Hillary Clinton of sexism.

There's no difference. They're all Democrats, and they're all disgusting.
Hey muddy----maybe your time would be better spent trying to do something to save your party! It is going down for the third time!
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 11:52 PM   #36 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 5,888
Thanks: 658
Thanked 186 Times in 130 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mithrall View Post
I have stated my reasons for not supporting Clinton in several previous posts here, the abominable way she has run her campaign only served to make me far more confident in my choice. I am not "hate-filled" or "irrational" towards Clinton, I could hardly be more calm in my decision. As far as the candidates being different only by very slight degrees, I will have to disagree with you there. I think there are some very major differences. There may not be huge differences in stated policies other than the "gas tax holiday" but there are huge differences in thier decision making process, temperament as well as scrupels or lack therof. When it comes down to it, that is what is most important to me in a president, someone who will make good decisions, someone who wont act rashly and someone who will act honorably.
I hear you! From the beginning of this campaign until this moment now anyone who supports Obama has been treated to the DISTINCTLY Rovian tactic of having these half crazed witches running around telling us why we are chosing to do so.

Let's see---we have be "drinking the koolaid" , we are not considering the issues but dazzled by a speech, we are denying that racism exists in America, ...........the list is interminable!

No matter how much you try to explain to these loonies on steroids that TRUTH, ACCURACY, JUDGMENT, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SKILLS, INTEGRITY, MORALITY, FAIR PLAY, KNOWLEDGE, AND DIPLOMACY are things that we value they don't seem to get it!

And at the same time that they are bitching incessantly about somebody kissing their ass to get them to stick with the democratic party---they continue to launch the same mindless shit missles and then stare wide eyed as every day in every way many many Obama supporters give less and less of a damn about what they do, or who they vote for.

They have tried to make themselves somehow soooooo important that:

1) HILLARY is now the only white person in america who can get the vote of the white working class.

2) Hillary is the ONLY woman in the nation who can get the white woman vote!

3) If THEY can't have Hillary then they ---being the rational, responsible, non racist, non fanatical, gracious losers that they are, they will actually try to sabatoge the party as a whole.

And why? Hillary went into this election with:

---MORE name recognition than any candidate ever to run for office in the history of this nation.

---A surrogate who was the most popular politician in this party since JFK.

---More financial connections than any candidate in the history of presidential elections.

---MASSIVE polled advantages inside the dem party:

ALL last year Hillary was ahead in the polls. Going into the primary's in December Pew had her at 46% to Obama's 26%

He did not begin to surpass her in polls until early Feb--(after she pulled her Abortion mailer Rove crap in New Hampshire).


The bottom line was this election was Hillary's to lose---and she lost it!

And now these mama's from HELL want to act like it is Obama's fault???

Get over it!

Feel free to play with this interactive graph of all the polls since this began and see just how Hillary pissed this whole thing away!

Last edited by RK77; 05-16-2008 at 12:01 AM.
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RK77 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-16-2008, 04:57 AM   #37 (permalink)
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 334
My Mood:
Thanks: 8
Thanked 33 Times in 23 Posts
Insipid is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RK77 View Post
They are hypocritical sore losers. If you go to one of the Hillho web sites---I forget which one---they have a compilation of all the blatantly sexist remarks that have been made by the pundits.

There problem is that Fox news made about 90% of them but these women are so desparate for attention at this point they are willing to do every executive at Fox to get heard!

That's simply not true. Most of them have come from MSNBC. Particularly Chris Mathews.
Insipid is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 05:00 AM   #38 (permalink)
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 334
My Mood:
Thanks: 8
Thanked 33 Times in 23 Posts
Insipid is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RK77 View Post
I hear you! From the beginning of this campaign until this moment now anyone who supports Obama has been treated to the DISTINCTLY Rovian tactic of having these half crazed witches running around telling us why we are chosing to do so.

Let's see---we have be "drinking the koolaid" , we are not considering the issues but dazzled by a speech, we are denying that racism exists in America, ...........the list is interminable!

No matter how much you try to explain to these loonies on steroids that TRUTH, ACCURACY, JUDGMENT, FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SKILLS, INTEGRITY, MORALITY, FAIR PLAY, KNOWLEDGE, AND DIPLOMACY are things that we value they don't seem to get it!

And at the same time that they are bitching incessantly about somebody kissing their ass to get them to stick with the democratic party---they continue to launch the same mindless shit missles and then stare wide eyed as every day in every way many many Obama supporters give less and less of a damn about what they do, or who they vote for.

They have tried to make themselves somehow soooooo important that:

1) HILLARY is now the only white person in america who can get the vote of the white working class.

2) Hillary is the ONLY woman in the nation who can get the white woman vote!

3) If THEY can't have Hillary then they ---being the rational, responsible, non racist, non fanatical, gracious losers that they are, they will actually try to sabatoge the party as a whole.

And why? Hillary went into this election with:

---MORE name recognition than any candidate ever to run for office in the history of this nation.

---A surrogate who was the most popular politician in this party since JFK.

---More financial connections than any candidate in the history of presidential elections.

---MASSIVE polled advantages inside the dem party:

ALL last year Hillary was ahead in the polls. Going into the primary's in December Pew had her at 46% to Obama's 26%

He did not begin to surpass her in polls until early Feb--(after she pulled her Abortion mailer Rove crap in New Hampshire).


The bottom line was this election was Hillary's to lose---and she lost it!

And now these mama's from HELL want to act like it is Obama's fault???

Get over it!

Feel free to play with this interactive graph of all the polls since this began and see just how Hillary pissed this whole thing away!
Howard Dean had similar advantages in 2004. His supporters were similarly angry at John Kerry. But they came together. But people like yourself don't make it easy.

One thing worse than a sore loser is a sore winner. And that's certainly what you are.
Insipid is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2008, 05:52 AM   #39 (permalink)
punk nun
 
itsmeeeeeee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 53 miles west of venus
Posts: 3,611
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 200
Thanked 669 Times in 397 Posts
itsmeeeeeee is a famous PG member
1) the two samples of sexism posted are pretty damn weak.

2) i don't recall people calling her evil, as has been suggested. to be clear - she's been called a lot of things - inept, unethical, a dirty campaigner, a horrible fundraiser, inconsistent, insincere, etc.

so let's cut the bullshit here! NO ONE can, in good conscience, say that obama's campaign has been "intensely sexist" as these people maintain!



__________________

"NEVER underestimate the Democrat's ability to snatch DEFEAT from the jaws of victory."


itsmeeeeeee is online now   Top Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to itsmeeeeeee For This Useful Post:
Old 05-16-2008, 04:12 PM   #40 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Mithrall's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 514
Thanks: 61
Thanked 85 Times in 48 Posts
Mithrall is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Insipid View Post
I'm not by the say saying that this is optimal, perhaps the tradition of deferring to the comander in chief in these matters is wrong, but to say that Hillary is a monster because she followed that tradition is just wrong.
You know, I'm not a big fan of tradition for tradition's sake. Too many evils have been excused because they are "Tradition"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insipid View Post
As far as their decision making process goes: how do you know WHAT her decision making process is, or his for that matter? You haven't seen EITHER of them make tough decisions, nor have they been in a presidency where they've had to make any tough decisions.
Now while I can't look into thier brains and see what gears are turning, I can make some reasonable deductions about thier decision making process based upon some of thier decisions; Hillary Clinton sponsered a flag burning ammendment, I think this one tells me several things about Hillary Clinton's decision making process. 1) It tells me she is willing to alter, or at least willing to look like she is, the U.S. Constitution in order to pander to the far right. 2) It tells me she just doesn't get it that the true strength of the flag lies not in its form but in what it symbolizes. Her vote on the Iraq war, now you argue that she tried to enact safeguards against him misusing the authority they granted him, how do you explain her vote on virtually the same sort of authorization against Iran? "fool me once, shame on — shame on you. Fool me — you can't get fooled again." Now, you wanna talk appeasement, the Democratic leadership in Congress have been practicing appeasement for seven years. The Gas Tax Holiday; That's leadership? There wasn't a single economist that said that was a good idea. Hell even Bush was able to find a few "scientists" that thought global warming was a good thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insipid View Post
Yes, Hillary has been more negative in recent months, but that's simply because she's been down in delegates and had to do something just to give herself the chance. You do not know her, you do not know him, all you know is what their policies are and they're not that different. Certainly not different enough to swear you'd never support one or the other and seem rational.
No, you are right, I have never met either of them in person or spent time talking to them one on one, I probably never will. But just like 99.99% of the rest of the country, I am gonna have to rely on my observations of thier character from afar. What I have seen could not have made the difference any more stark to me. This brings me to Sniper-Gate and for the love of me, I still can't wrap my mind around this gaff and explain it in a way that is charitable to her. I have taken my fair share of psychology courses(I find the human mind fascinating, and disturbing at times) The only thing I can say for certain about Hillary is that there is something not quite right there. I will leave it at that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Insipid View Post
Barack, or at least his subordinates did, seized on some very true statements Hillary made about LBJ to insinuate that she was somehow a racist. Barack also seized upon the fairy tale comments Clinton made, took them out of context, in order to imply that he was calling his entire candidacy a fairy tale. This was done simply to enrage the black community and win support to Obama. And it worked. Dirty pool? Maybe, but effective politics. Sure it made me angry at the time, but i got over it. Politics aint bean bag.
There are two sides to this, is it possible that Hillary and her subordinates were taking the black vote for granted? Afterall, they are the most loyal Democratic voting block, where are they gonna go? Perhaps Bill Clinton took the title "first black President" too literally. As far as them being "out of context" I am not black but I remember seeing Hillary's "fairy-tale" comments and I found them very insulting to me personally. It came off very poorly, kinda like you right now stating that because I state that I would never vote for Hillary for President, I must be irrational.
Mithrall is online now   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher