PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Election Center 2008
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-19-2008, 01:29 PM   #1 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 6,485
Thanks: 725
Thanked 222 Times in 154 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Hillary is back down in the dirt again! (New day, old tricks)

Hillary is waddling in the mud again.......

Which is where most pigs like Hillary live so why should be anyone be surprised!!

She has AGAIN determined that her voters are so consumately stupid that she will tell them blatant lies to get their votes!

Todays lie?

No president has ever won the presidency without Kentucky!

WRONG!!

Kennedy won without Kentucky in 1960!
Eisenhower won without Kentucky in 1952!
Harding won without Kentucky in 1920!
Taft won without Kentucky in 1908!
Taft won without Kentucky in 1904!
McKinnley won without Kentucky in 1900!


This woman has NO relationship with the truth! She is the penultimate political whore! There is NOTHING beneath her!

AS IF THAT WERE NOT ENOUGH:

Now she is also back to the only caucus state thing again! She has AGAIN told those who she speaks to that Obama has "mostly" won caucuses siting "places like Alaska" as though they weren't Americans or even people!

Here are the wins in primary contests that the Hillho chose to ignore.

State -----------Obama/Clinton --------Spread
1) Connecticut----51/47 ----------4
2) Delaware------53/43 ----------10
3) DC-------------75/24-----------51
4) Louisiana------57/36-----------21
5) Maryland------60/37-----------23
6) Alabama-------56/42-----------14
7) Georgia--------67/31-----------36
8) Illinois---------65/33------------32
9) Mississippi-----61/37------------24
10) Missouri--------49/48------------1
11) S. Carolina-----55/27-----------28
12) Vermont-------59/39-----------20
13) Virginia---------64/35-----------29
14) Wisconsin------58/41-----------17
15) N. Carolina-----56/42-----------14
16) Utah------------57/39-----------18

Thus it becomes readily apparent that Obama has won as many PRIMARY contests as Hillary has won valid contests!

So why does she lie?

AND---(you didn't think she was through did you?)

Now she has set her OWN delegate total!

Hillary has determined that she will increase the delegate count to 2210 (not 2209 as it would be if Fla and Michigan would have counted---not 2024 as the party has set the total).

The queen Hillho has made up her OWN personal criteria!


TELL YA WHAT.......

All you Hillho-ers who are going around here whining about people being nice to you and "looking over" your endorsement of racism and lying and despicable tactics and BAD Rovian political imitations (at least Rove won when he did the shit)-----Get back with me when your candidate decides to curtail her bullshit!

YOU SEE-----the retards argument that Obama has obviously won and thus someone should kiss your butt to get you to support Obama holds no water. Until the candidate on leave from the loony bin stops the behavior then your judgment and rationality remains in question!

Instead of praying for some major event to catapult Hillary into a nomination that she has not earned---maybe you should pray for the rest of the world to have REALLY, REALLY short memories about your judgment to date.

Oh, and................could you guys stop whining about this campaign going on around the Hillho?

For those of you telling the lies about voting for Obama you should be glad that he has the judgment to know when spinning his wheels to make the Hillho feel better about losing is damaging to the goals of the party!

Last edited by RK77; 05-19-2008 at 01:34 PM.
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 07:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 6,485
Thanks: 725
Thanked 222 Times in 154 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
And if all this ain't waddling in the mud..............

Check this out!!
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 07:28 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 340
My Mood:
Thanks: 8
Thanked 33 Times in 23 Posts
Insipid is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RK77 View Post
And if all this ain't waddling in the mud..............

Check this out!!
Oh god, if simply stating that is your definition of "waddling in mud" what have you been doing? Your level of hate is so high that you've been in shit for months now.

If she said no President has won without Kentucky since 1960 would that make you happy? Probably not, EVERYTHING Hillary says you hate, cause that's all you're about.

Of course chicken shit rk77 is hiding, like the scared little shit she is behind the ignore button.
Insipid is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 07:59 PM   #4 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Syxxt3's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Grand Junction, CO
Posts: 152
My Mood:
Thanks: 17
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Syxxt3 is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RK77 View Post
Hillary is waddling in the mud again.......

Which is where most pigs like Hillary live so why should be anyone be surprised!!

She has AGAIN determined that her voters are so consumately stupid that she will tell them blatant lies to get their votes!

Todays lie?

No president has ever won the presidency without Kentucky!

WRONG!!

Kennedy won without Kentucky in 1960!
Eisenhower won without Kentucky in 1952!
Harding won without Kentucky in 1920!
Taft won without Kentucky in 1908!
Taft won without Kentucky in 1904!
McKinnley won without Kentucky in 1900!


This woman has NO relationship with the truth! She is the penultimate political whore! There is NOTHING beneath her!

AS IF THAT WERE NOT ENOUGH:

Now she is also back to the only caucus state thing again! She has AGAIN told those who she speaks to that Obama has "mostly" won caucuses siting "places like Alaska" as though they weren't Americans or even people!

Here are the wins in primary contests that the Hillho chose to ignore.

State -----------Obama/Clinton --------Spread
1) Connecticut----51/47 ----------4
2) Delaware------53/43 ----------10
3) DC-------------75/24-----------51
4) Louisiana------57/36-----------21
5) Maryland------60/37-----------23
6) Alabama-------56/42-----------14
7) Georgia--------67/31-----------36
8) Illinois---------65/33------------32
9) Mississippi-----61/37------------24
10) Missouri--------49/48------------1
11) S. Carolina-----55/27-----------28
12) Vermont-------59/39-----------20
13) Virginia---------64/35-----------29
14) Wisconsin------58/41-----------17
15) N. Carolina-----56/42-----------14
16) Utah------------57/39-----------18

Thus it becomes readily apparent that Obama has won as many PRIMARY contests as Hillary has won valid contests!

So why does she lie?

AND---(you didn't think she was through did you?)

Now she has set her OWN delegate total!

Hillary has determined that she will increase the delegate count to 2210 (not 2209 as it would be if Fla and Michigan would have counted---not 2024 as the party has set the total).

The queen Hillho has made up her OWN personal criteria!


TELL YA WHAT.......

All you Hillho-ers who are going around here whining about people being nice to you and "looking over" your endorsement of racism and lying and despicable tactics and BAD Rovian political imitations (at least Rove won when he did the shit)-----Get back with me when your candidate decides to curtail her bullshit!

YOU SEE-----the retards argument that Obama has obviously won and thus someone should kiss your butt to get you to support Obama holds no water. Until the candidate on leave from the loony bin stops the behavior then your judgment and rationality remains in question!

Instead of praying for some major event to catapult Hillary into a nomination that she has not earned---maybe you should pray for the rest of the world to have REALLY, REALLY short memories about your judgment to date.

Oh, and................could you guys stop whining about this campaign going on around the Hillho?

For those of you telling the lies about voting for Obama you should be glad that he has the judgment to know when spinning his wheels to make the Hillho feel better about losing is damaging to the goals of the party!
Actually, I think you are misquoting her. I was watching her speech on CSPAN and I'm pretty sure it went like this: "and you know, Kentucky has a history of voting for the candidate that ends up being President..."

So, maybe you can post a source for your claim that she really said that.
Syxxt3 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 08:37 PM   #5 (permalink)
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 340
My Mood:
Thanks: 8
Thanked 33 Times in 23 Posts
Insipid is a normal PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syxxt3 View Post
Actually, I think you are misquoting her. I was watching her speech on CSPAN and I'm pretty sure it went like this: "and you know, Kentucky has a history of voting for the candidate that ends up being President..."

So, maybe you can post a source for your claim that she really said that.
Even if it were an EXACT quote it's hardly being "in the dirt". She wasn't calling Barack a name, or lying about his record, or misquoting him. She simply made a factual error that has been true since 1960. If that qualifies, "dirt" virtually has no meaning at all.

Plus it reveals RK77 to be about the biggest hypocrite on the planet since one of her biggest arguments for shitting all over Florida is the fact that Florida has delivered for the dems only twice in the past 30 years. So we should disrespect Florida for "only" producing 2 wins in 30 years, but we should honor and respect Kentucky which voted democratic once in the past 50 years. She makes no sense other than she hates hillary.

I almost said she loves obama, but i'm convinced that she doesn't really. Obama would never condone, abide by or support the level of hatred she spews. I have to keep reminding myself of that.

Last edited by Insipid; 05-19-2008 at 08:42 PM.
Insipid is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 09:06 PM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 6,485
Thanks: 725
Thanked 222 Times in 154 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syxxt3 View Post
Actually, I think you are misquoting her. I was watching her speech on CSPAN and I'm pretty sure it went like this: "and you know, Kentucky has a history of voting for the candidate that ends up being President..."

So, maybe you can post a source for your claim that she really said that.
I was watching it on C-span too. So far not on youtube but I will be happy to post it as soon as it comes up (as can you).

Any comments about her caucus state lies?
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 09:41 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Syxxt3's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Grand Junction, CO
Posts: 152
My Mood:
Thanks: 17
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Syxxt3 is a normal PG member
LOL. No, no comment at all.

Just trying to keep you busy...
Syxxt3 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 09:46 PM   #8 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Syxxt3's Avatar
 

Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Grand Junction, CO
Posts: 152
My Mood:
Thanks: 17
Thanked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Syxxt3 is a normal PG member
Quote:
Plus it reveals RK77 to be about the biggest hypocrite on the planet since one of her biggest arguments for shitting all over Florida is the fact that Florida has delivered for the dems only twice in the past 30 years. So we should disrespect Florida for "only" producing 2 wins in 30 years, but we should honor and respect Kentucky which voted democratic once in the past 50 years. She makes no sense other than she hates hillary.
I just wonder if Florida is a lost cause if this comes down this way.

What gets me is I heard the argument that it doesn't matter that Hillary won CA because it will go blue anyway. That is also true of a lot of Obama states.

But, FL...OH...MI...PA... Those are big swing states and I don't see us winning without at least two of them, and then it will still be close.
Syxxt3 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 10:41 PM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Michigan by way of Iowa
Posts: 6,485
Thanks: 725
Thanked 222 Times in 154 Posts
RK77 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Syxxt3 View Post
I just wonder if Florida is a lost cause if this comes down this way.

What gets me is I heard the argument that it doesn't matter that Hillary won CA because it will go blue anyway. That is also true of a lot of Obama states.

But, FL...OH...MI...PA... Those are big swing states and I don't see us winning without at least two of them, and then it will still be close.
florida is not generally a blue state. Clinton won without it in 1992.

Michigan has gone democratic in every election since 1992 and would easily be democratic this year. Clinton in 1996 beat Dole badly in Mich (52% to 39%), however he only won the white vote by 3%--losing white men 39% to 49% BUT winning white women 53% to 39%. What gave him the huge margin was the African American vote which he won 82% to 10%.

Hillary would suppress the black vote dramatically and the republicans are VERY likely to pull the black christian vote in michigan (they already have operatives on the ground here working on it).

Ohio was won for Bill Clinton by the Black vote in 1996 as I posted on another thread earlier.

PA was won by Bill Clinton in 1996 (50 to 40%) But again the he barely won the white vote (46% to 45%) and it was the african american vote that gave him the win (90% to 8%).

All of the swing states that keep being thought to be sooooo important are SWUNG by a voting block that Hillary and her staff and her supporters have spent every day of this campaign figuring out every way they could to insult and demean and diminish.

So----it you believe that 2 of the 4 states must be won then it would only make sense to vote for the candidate who is winning the voting block that has made the difference in swinging those states.


As for madam Insipids vapid statement Kentucky voted dem in '64, '76, '92, '96. She needs to learn to read. I don't see the loss of Kentucky as relevant at all in either the primary OR the general election.

Perhaps her life has a dearth of emotional fullfillment so she wastes her time and energy emoting over presidential candidates. That may be why she is retarded enough to think try to attach grade school feckless emotional import to everyone elses choices.

I will not support the Hillho---because she is a political whore. Because I have NO respect for her as a wife (if you call what she has a marriage), a mother, a lawyer, or a politician. Because I place a LOT of emphasis on truth and accuracy, originality and creativity. Because I don't believe this nation needs a hard core racist evangelistisic misogynist like the Hillho leading it. Because I think that her behavior has set women back about a century!

It's not a soap opera or a chick flick where one gets all emotionally invested in the outcome (well---it must be for Insipid---but that is just as insipid and vapid as calling oneself insipid is, imho).

BUT---if it makes the dizz cadet of the first magnitude feel better to hyperemote ---- have at it! That's why I put her on ignore---too many irrational posts---nothing to respect or waste time on.
RK77 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-19-2008, 10:48 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master of Quill-Fu
 
The_Heretic's Avatar
 
Space Invaders Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Taylorsville, UT [stuck in the 20th century].
Posts: 7,368
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 35
Thanked 142 Times in 109 Posts
The_Heretic is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by RK77 View Post
florida is not generally a blue state. Clinton won without it in 1992.

Michigan has gone democratic in every election since 1992 and would easily be democratic this year. Clinton in 1996 beat Dole badly in Mich (52% to 39%), however he only won the white vote by 3%--losing white men 39% to 49% BUT winning white women 53% to 39%. What gave him the huge margin was the African American vote which he won 82% to 10%.

Hillary would suppress the black vote dramatically and the republicans are VERY likely to pull the black christian vote in michigan (they already have operatives on the ground here working on it).

Ohio was won for Bill Clinton by the Black vote in 1996 as I posted on another thread earlier.

PA was won by Bill Clinton in 1996 (50 to 40%) But again the he barely won the white vote (46% to 45%) and it was the african american vote that gave him the win (90% to 8%).

All of the swing states that keep being thought to be sooooo important are SWUNG by a voting block that Hillary and her staff and her supporters have spent every day of this campaign figuring out every way they could to insult and demean and diminish.

So----it you believe that 2 of the 4 states must be won then it would only make sense to vote for the candidate who is winning the voting block that has made the difference in swinging those states.


As for madam Insipids vapid statement Kentucky voted dem in '64, '76, '92, '96. She needs to learn to read. I don't see the loss of Kentucky as relevant at all in either the primary OR the general election.

Perhaps her life has a dearth of emotional fullfillment so she wastes her time and energy emoting over presidential candidates. That may be why she is retarded enough to think try to attach grade school feckless emotional import to everyone elses choices.

I will not support the Hillho---because she is a political whore. Because I have NO respect for her as a wife (if you call what she has a marriage), a mother, a lawyer, or a politician. Because I place a LOT of emphasis on truth and accuracy, originality and creativity. Because I don't believe this nation needs a hard core racist evangelistisic misogynist like the Hillho leading it. Because I think that her behavior has set women back about a century!

It's not a soap opera or a chick flick where one gets all emotionally invested in the outcome (well---it must be for Insipid---but that is just as insipid and vapid as calling oneself insipid is, imho).

BUT---if it makes the dizz cadet of the first magnitude feel better to hyperemote ---- have at it! That's why I put her on ignore---too many irrational posts---nothing to respect or waste time on.
Weirder still... she's a he you've been busting on, yet all the attribute you ascribe to him still fit to a T.

__________________
"Enough!!" -so rang Barack Obama's voice off the walls of Mile High Stadium
The_Heretic is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher