PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Election Center 2008
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2008, 10:43 AM   #1 (permalink)
Extraterrestrial
 
OldManOnFire's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,633
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
OldManOnFire is a famous PG member
Oops...now what???

Polls: Clinton does better in the swing states
Posted: 12:00 PM ET

From CNN Ticker Producer Alexander Mooney


A new poll shows Clinton is in a better position to win some swing states than Obama.
(CNN) — A new series of Quinnipiac polls out of Ohio, Florida, and Pennsylvania appear to bolster Hillary Clinton's argument that she is better positioned than Barack Obama to beat John McCain in the crucial swing states.

According to the polls released Thursday, Hillary Clinton would beat John McCain in all three states by wide margins while Barack Obama would lose to the Arizona senator in Ohio and Florida and narrowly beat McCain in Pennsylvania.

CNN Polling Director Keating Holland said the poll could be a "early-warning sign" for Democrats, though cautioned early polls often are not predictive.

Specifically, the poll found Clinton tops McCain in Florida by 7 points (48 percent to 41 percent), in Ohio by 7 points (48 percent to 41 percent) and in Pennsylvania by 13 percent (50 percent to 37 percent).

Meanwhile the poll finds McCain would beat Obama by 4 points in Florida (45-41 percent) and by 4 points in Ohio (44 percent to 40 percent). Obama beats McCain in Pennsylvania, but by a narrower margin than Clinton does — he beats McCain by 6 points there, 46 percent to 40 percent.

According to Quinnipiac, the difference between Clinton and Obama's performances in the state can be traced to the fact that several Clinton supporters and white working class voters there say they will support McCain over Obama if the Illinois senator is the party's nominee. (Related: Can Obama win over the working class)

"This could be an early-warning sign for the Democrats, particularly since Obama did not do well in the Pennsylvania and Ohio primaries," Holland said. "On the other hand, any poll conducted in May — particularly when the primaries have not finished — may have little predictive value."

The last presidential candidate to win the White House without winning two of the three largest swing states was John F. Kennedy in 1960. (Kennedy won Pennsylvania that year, but lost Ohio and Florida.)

But the 2008 electoral map could look different than most recent elections, both the McCain and Obama campaigns have said. Each candidate has shown to strongly appeal to independent and moderate voters — meaning more states could be up for grabs this year than has been the case in past elections.

View more polling information at the CNN Election Center
__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...
OldManOnFire is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 10:46 AM   #2 (permalink)
Fool on the Hill
 
Vicariously I's Avatar
 
Breakout Champion! Moon Lander Champion!
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Wait.....where am I????
Posts: 1,196
My Mood:
Thanks: 59
Thanked 53 Times in 35 Posts
Vicariously I is a famous PG member
From the title I thought maybe McCain crapped his pants on stage.

Needless to say I was severely disappointed.
__________________
"It's hard to face reality when you're busy living in the American Dream."

Vicariously I
Vicariously I is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 10:55 AM   #3 (permalink)
Extraterrestrial
 
OldManOnFire's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,633
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
OldManOnFire is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicariously I View Post
From the title I thought maybe McCain crapped his pants on stage.

Needless to say I was severely disappointed.
If that was the story it would have been titled: Poops...now what???
__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...
OldManOnFire is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 11:05 AM   #4 (permalink)
punk nun
 
itsmeeeeeee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 53 miles west of venus
Posts: 3,848
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 218
Thanked 722 Times in 434 Posts
itsmeeeeeee is a famous PG member
as most of the polls are ALREADY demonstrating, in states like pennsylvannia, etc., obama is starting to win against mcSame in more and more of the swing states - and once he starts campaigning in them, and can QUIT FUCKING AROUND with primaries, his numbers will come up even faster.

obama's numbers improving in key states

it's pretty rich that you point to polls that would look a hell of lot better at this point in time had hillary had the grace and good sense to drop out a couple of months ago...

what a fucking waste of time, money and energy this has been!

and for WHAT?!!!
a dangerously strained and divided party?

count your blessings i'm feeling fairly generous today..
or you'd have a new butt hole!
__________________

"NEVER underestimate the Democrat's ability to snatch DEFEAT from the jaws of victory."



Last edited by itsmeeeeeee; 05-22-2008 at 11:19 AM.
itsmeeeeeee is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 11:21 AM   #5 (permalink)
Extraterrestrial
 
OldManOnFire's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,633
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
OldManOnFire is a famous PG member
Quote:
QUOTE=itsmeeeeeee;187528 it's pretty rich that you point to polls that would look a hell of lot better at this point in time had hillary had the grace and good sense to drop out a couple of months ago...
I'm not pointing towards any polls...I shared a news article which pointed to certain polls but what the hell--always try to shoot the messenger.

Quote:
what a fucking waste of time, money and energy this has been!
Yeah right...what a waste to allow people in all states a right to vote in the primaries. And more right that we should allow any candidate to fight it out until the end since today we prefer dropouts in order to satisfy our self-serving needs.

Quote:
and for WHAT?!!!
a dangerously strained and divided party?
Says who? Says you? If the Dem party is incapable of having an all-out primary, and will fracture to pieces as you 'guess', then they are not worthy enough to be in the contest.

Quote:
count your blessings i'm feeling fairly generous today..
or you'd have a new butt hole!
Go ahead and show your maturity and intelligence...stop making idle threats towards me...let the world hear your mature voice...
__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...
OldManOnFire is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 11:41 AM   #6 (permalink)
punk nun
 
itsmeeeeeee's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 53 miles west of venus
Posts: 3,848
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 218
Thanked 722 Times in 434 Posts
itsmeeeeeee is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldManOnFire View Post
I'm not pointing towards any polls...I shared a news article which pointed to certain polls but what the hell--always try to shoot the messenger.



Yeah right...what a waste to allow people in all states a right to vote in the primaries. And more right that we should allow any candidate to fight it out until the end since today we prefer dropouts in order to satisfy our self-serving needs.



Says who? Says you? If the Dem party is incapable of having an all-out primary, and will fracture to pieces as you 'guess', then they are not worthy enough to be in the contest.



Go ahead and show your maturity and intelligence...stop making idle threats towards me...let the world hear your mature voice...
yawn...
__________________

"NEVER underestimate the Democrat's ability to snatch DEFEAT from the jaws of victory."


itsmeeeeeee is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2008, 12:30 PM   #7 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
CosmicRocker's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: lost in a lost world
Posts: 7,667
My Mood:
Thanks: 126
Thanked 96 Times in 76 Posts
CosmicRocker is a famous PG member
forget it Old Man; your resonable stance backed with facts, doesn't fly with Obamaniacs.

Obama will campaign in these staes - but so will McCain..

One way to ensure a win is to put Hillary on the Tix.
But it seems the fanatics would prefer to lose then bend.
They may very well get their wish.
__________________

Try a little love. and it cant go wrong
Get on the right thing
My little love, you cant go wrong
Get on the right thing .
CosmicRocker is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 10:46 AM   #8 (permalink)
Extraterrestrial
 
OldManOnFire's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,633
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
OldManOnFire is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by CosmicRocker View Post
forget it Old Man; your resonable stance backed with facts, doesn't fly with Obamaniacs.

Obama will campaign in these staes - but so will McCain..

One way to ensure a win is to put Hillary on the Tix.
But it seems the fanatics would prefer to lose then bend.
They may very well get their wish.
Logically speaking, Clinton would have a better chance overcoming McCain in the general election. But the blind-faith Obama supporters are excited about their blind-faith in the general election, so today blind-faith rules the moment.

Which of the three remaining candidates is best suited to be president? My logic says it would be McCain, second it would be Clinton, and last would be Obama.

Of these three candidates, which have the most negatives to overcome? Let's see...McCain is older and has supported Bush...and Clinton is a Clinton and a woman...and Obama simply has zero experience along with very very close association with Wright and Rezko and a wife who has not been proud of the USA, and is Black. How will these negatives play out in the no-holds-barred general election?

In these above statements I did not include my personal thoughts of who 'I believe or think' should be president. I'm just trying to look at it logically, without personal bias, and this is the way I see it.

Further, Obama has alienated as many people as he has brought into the game...like MI and FL and many of the working class. We can say since McCain is a Republican there is no way he should win...but 'we' forget there are equal numbers of Republicans in the USA and depending on how McCain does, it will be hard to expect them to switch their votes to the Dem candidate so I don't see being Republican as being a huge negative.

Why would we vote the least experienced person into the most critical job position in the entire world?? How can we let our pride and loyalty to a silly political party or a single candidate persuade how we vote for president of the USA?

If this is just a personality choice, then let's bring back Bob Barker and just make all the decisions in a 3-hour game-show in prime time...we can let the candidates sing and dance their way into our hearts...
__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...
OldManOnFire is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2008, 10:54 AM   #9 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
guest1234567's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,820
Thanks: 17
Thanked 60 Times in 43 Posts
guest1234567 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by OldManOnFire View Post
If this is just a personality choice, then let's bring back Bob Barker and just make all the decisions in a 3-hour game-show in prime time...we can let the candidates sing and dance their way into our hearts...
guest1234567 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2008, 08:55 AM   #10 (permalink)
Extraterrestrial
 
OldManOnFire's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: California
Posts: 1,633
My Mood:
Thanks: 4
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
OldManOnFire is a famous PG member
Quote:
QUOTE=guest1234567;188131 I'D BUY THAT FOR A DOLLAR!!

Or it can be called 'DIALING FOR DOLLARS' where it's like a telethon, and the candidates can say things, or show off their skills like singing or tap dancing, and the public calls in and pledges hundreds of millions of dollars...and the candidate who has the most money at the end of the show is the new president.

There can be categories of performance like; who is the best liar, who is the most arrogant, who appears to have the best private agenda, who is the dumbest, who needs all their words written for them, who has the best smile...that grin which is backed by deceit, etc.

I suggest this type of show will have more citizen participation than the general election will have...and if this is true...no wonder the US is in such bad shape today...
__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...
OldManOnFire is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
clinton, election, mccain, obama, primaries

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher