PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > Foreign Politics
Share PG Forum Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-18-2008, 04:33 PM   #1 (permalink)
The party of the pissed!!
 
BillCosby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,502
My Mood:
Thanks: 183
Thanked 117 Times in 91 Posts
BillCosby has disabled reputation
Collective punishment for Gaza is wrong -U.N.

Adds Ban Ki-moon comment in paragraphs 6, 10-11)

By Louis Charbonneau

UNITED NATIONS, Jan 18 (Reuters) - Israel has a right to respond to security threats but should not collectively punish the Gaza population for rocket attacks from the Palestinian territory, the U.N. humanitarian affairs chief said on Friday.

The United Nations also criticized Israel's decision to close all border crossings with Gaza, preventing delivery of a U.N. aid shipment to the territory's 1.5 million people, most of whom depend on foreign aid.

"We all understand the security problems and the need to respond to that but collective punishment of the people of Gaza is not, we believe, the appropriate way to do that," said John Holmes, undersecretary-general for Humanitarian Affairs.

The deputy head of Israel's mission to the United Nations, Daniel Carmon, told Reuters Israel's actions were "what any responsible government would do when it is confronted as we are with this surge of violence and terrorism."

He gave no indication of when the closure would end.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called "for an immediate cessation of Palestinian sniper and rocket attacks into Israel, and for maximum restraint on the part of the Israel Defence Forces," spokeswoman Michel Montas said in a statement.

Israel has killed at least 33 Palestinians in Gaza this week as part of what it describes as a stepped-up campaign to force Hamas to rein in militants who have fired more than 110 rockets into the Jewish state in the last three days alone.

It bombed the Hamas-run Interior Ministry in Gaza on Friday, killing one woman and injuring at least 30 others who were nearby, medical officials said.

Holmes said he was worried about the sealing of the border crossings because "they are the lifeline for the delivery of humanitarian assistance and other goods to Gaza."

U.N. PRESSURE ON ISRAEL AND HAMAS

Ban joined Holmes in urging Israel to end the closure, saying it cut off the population from fuel supplies needed to pump water and generate electricity for homes and hospitals.

"The closure will also cause further shortages of food, medical and relief items in the Gaza Strip," he said.

Holmes said the Israeli response was unwarranted.

"This kind of action against the people in Gaza cannot be justified, even by those rocket attacks," he said.

Carmon said Israel was "very much aware of the humanitarian situation in Gaza." The Israeli government has said that humanitarian goods would be allowed into the territory.

Holmes also urged the Palestinian militant group Hamas, which seized control of Gaza last June, to use its authority to put an end to the attacks against Israel.

"I'm calling on the Hamas leaders ... to do whatever they can to stop these attacks because they claim to be in control of Gaza there," Holmes said. "Therefore they have a responsibility to stop the attacks."

Israel has imposed strict curbs on non-humanitarian supplies to Gaza since Hamas's takeover.

But many essentials have been getting in, either with Israeli approval or through smuggling, though supplies are limited and prices have risen steeply.

Holmes said he worried the violence in Gaza could spin out of control, making a dire humanitarian situation even worse.


"I believe it is a (humanitarian) crisis already," he said. (Editing by Bill Trott)
__________________
Preventive war is not war!!!!Counter-terror is not terror


http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b47/leagion/export.gif
BillCosby is offline   Top Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to BillCosby For This Useful Post:
Old 01-29-2008, 05:06 PM   #2 (permalink)
Truth Lion
 
Jonesy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,555
Thanks: 10
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
Jonesy is a famous PG member
Anyone who uses holocaust pity as propaganda must have something awful to hide.

If possible, try to ignore the people or the groups, focusing solely on the actions.

Last edited by Jonesy; 01-29-2008 at 05:11 PM.
Jonesy is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2008, 11:46 AM   #3 (permalink)
The party of the pissed!!
 
BillCosby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,502
My Mood:
Thanks: 183
Thanked 117 Times in 91 Posts
BillCosby has disabled reputation
Does that apply to everyone or just some ppl???
__________________
Preventive war is not war!!!!Counter-terror is not terror


http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b47/leagion/export.gif
BillCosby is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008, 11:11 AM   #4 (permalink)
Member
 
hotair's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 88
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
hotair is a normal PG member
Collective punishment is wrong!

I am not entirely sure what this is suppose to mean. Since, in essence, all punishment is collective. The only point of punishing anyone, for anything, is to set an example for others to not do the same thing. Thus punishment is by design, a ‘deterrent by example’!

Back in the good old days. If someone broke a law, they were beheaded, and their head was posted on the city gate. Providing the clear message to everyone entering the city . . . This is what we will do to you, if you break any of our laws!!!

With some countries still recognizing the need to hold people accountable for their actions, and other countries that choose to believe that the concepts of responsibility, and accountability should no longer be expected. The UN now has the problem of having to deal with these clashing cultures. Until such a time as the UN finally takes a stand on this issue, one way or the other, the UN is going to continue to have to deal with the problems that they are creating.

It is universally excepted that in order for any law to be just, it must apply to everyone equally. When a governing body decides to start arbitrarily exempting people from any law, that law is no longer considered to be just. Thus enforcing the unjust law, becomes nearly impossible.



I admit that I am very confused by your whining.

With the one single exception of the continued existence of The State of Israel, Gazans now have everything else that they have been demanding. They wanted their own land, and now they have it. They wanted the own government, and now they have it. They wanted their independence, and now they have it! The fact that they are unable to support themselves, is entirely their problem.

When the Israelis pulled out of Gaza, they left behind everything that the Gazan’s would need to properly support themselves, including tens of billions of dollars worth of the most technically advanced hydroponic greenhouses on the planet. With those greenhouses the Gazans could raise all of the food that they could possibly eat. But instead of feeding themselves, the Gazans choose to destroy those greenhouses. How is this Israel’s fault?

What business is it of the UN to reward these people for being stupid? They wanted their independence, and now they have it! To bad!!! What have they done with it? They have chosen to turn themselves into a ‘terrorist state’.

Hamas is an internationally recognized terrorist organization. Now that they have become the government of Gaza, they continue to refuse to renounce terrorism! They continue to launch terrorists attacks against Israel! They have made Gaza into a ‘terrorist state’! (By any definition of the term.) By their own choice.

All of the laws (international, and otherwise) concerning states that sponsor, and/or otherwise support terrorism, are very clear on the matter. These very same laws are also very clear on the punishments that can be imposed on any nation that supports any ‘terrorist state’ including Gaza.

Now the UN wants everyone to ignore all of these laws, and to add insult to injury, are blaming the Israelis for being the victims. As though that were not enough, the UN wants to compel the Israelis to support a ‘terrorist state’ that is determined to destroy Israel.

All the while, Israel wants nothing to do with any of it anymore. As far as they are concerned, if the UN wants to support the terrorist state of Gaza, they can do it through Egypt now. Let the Egyptian government get sued for supporting a terrorist state. After all, supporting terrorism is only going to cost the Libyan government one hundred and ninety billion dollars ($190,000,000,000)!

I wonder how much Haliburton would be willing to pay for the Suez Canal???
__________________
So long, and thanks for all of the fish!!!
hotair is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2008, 11:40 AM   #5 (permalink)
The party of the pissed!!
 
BillCosby's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,502
My Mood:
Thanks: 183
Thanked 117 Times in 91 Posts
BillCosby has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by hotair View Post
Collective punishment is wrong!

I am not entirely sure what this is suppose to mean. Since, in essence, all punishment is collective. The only point of punishing anyone, for anything, is to set an example for others to not do the same thing. Thus punishment is by design, a ‘deterrent by example’!

Back in the good old days. If someone broke a law, they were beheaded, and their head was posted on the city gate. Providing the clear message to everyone entering the city . . . This is what we will do to you, if you break any of our laws!!!

With some countries still recognizing the need to hold people accountable for their actions, and other countries that choose to believe that the concepts of responsibility, and accountability should no longer be expected. The UN now has the problem of having to deal with these clashing cultures. Until such a time as the UN finally takes a stand on this issue, one way or the other, the UN is going to continue to have to deal with the problems that they are creating.

(well I could agree in part but your point & example would seem to apply to only some... That is we>usa & or Israel doing the example making....... If you have the balls to apply the same criteria to those two then please do so or state how they alone are exempt)

It is universally excepted that in order for any law to be just, it must apply to everyone equally. When a governing body decides to start arbitrarily exempting people from any law, that law is no longer considered to be just. Thus enforcing the unjust law, becomes nearly impossible. (lol. see above & please feel free to have a couple examples)



I admit that I am very confused by your whining.

With the one single exception of the continued existence of The State of Israel, Gazans now have everything else that they have been demanding. (not sure I recall them demanding a prison where their very lives are controlled by another country. Power. food etc. It is merely a sealed prison.... THey control almost nothing...) They wanted their own land, and now they have it. They wanted the own government, and now they have it. They wanted their independence, and now they have it! The fact that they are unable to support themselves, is entirely their problem. (LOL....... How can they support themselves??? I wonder how any of them even live...... No jobs. All land,. sea & air routes are blocked by other countires.. Expalaim me that kinda freedumb my bush..... You put a bird in a small cage & ask "why does it not fly.........)

When the Israelis pulled out of Gaza, they left behind everything that the Gazan’s would need to properly support themselves, including tens of billions of dollars worth of the most technically advanced hydroponic greenhouses on the planet. With those greenhouses the Gazans could raise all of the food that they could possibly eat. But instead of feeding themselves, the Gazans choose to destroy those greenhouses. How is this Israel’s fault? (did the Gazians destroy the power plant?? Did the Gazains seal the boarder.......?? Start there)

What business is it of the UN to reward these people for being stupid? They wanted their independence, and now they have it! To bad!!! What have they done with it? They have chosen to turn themselves into a ‘terrorist state’. (they have chosen......... When did they all vote on turning it into a terrorist state.... Please remeind me when the ppl there voted this????)

Hamas is an internationally recognized terrorist organization. Now that they have become the government of Gaza, they continue to refuse to renounce terrorism! They continue to launch terrorists attacks against Israel! They have made Gaza into a ‘terrorist state’! (By any definition of the term.) By their own choice. (why not state your definition of that term. & I will show you how it applies universally......)

All of the laws (international, and otherwise) concerning states that sponsor, and/or otherwise support terrorism, are very clear on the matter. (except that it does not apply to the usa or it's clients...) These very same laws are also very clear on the punishments that can be imposed on any nation that supports any ‘terrorist state’ including Gaza.

Now the UN wants everyone to ignore all of these laws, and to add insult to injury, are blaming the Israelis for being the victims. As though that were not enough, the UN wants to compel the Israelis to support a ‘terrorist state’ that is determined to destroy Israel.

All the while, Israel wants nothing to do with any of it anymore. As far as they are concerned, if the UN wants to support the terrorist state of Gaza, they can do it through Egypt now. Let the Egyptian government get sued for supporting a terrorist state. After all, supporting terrorism is only going to cost the Libyan government one hundred and ninety billion dollars ($190,000,000,000)!

I wonder how much Haliburton would be willing to pay for the Suez Canal???

Please feel free to define terrorism..........

Specifically define a terrorist state............
__________________
Preventive war is not war!!!!Counter-terror is not terror


http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b47/leagion/export.gif
BillCosby is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 12:03 AM   #6 (permalink)
Truth Lion
 
Jonesy's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,555
Thanks: 10
Thanked 32 Times in 23 Posts
Jonesy is a famous PG member
Basically, Jews are Arabs who left the middle-east a couple thousand years ago. But because of religious in-breeding, they stuck together. The reason they do not look quite like Arabs is because it is ok for them to marry whoever, as long as the person converts to Judaism.
Jonesy is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 12:09 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master of Quill-Fu
 
The_Heretic's Avatar
 
Asteroids Champion! Space Invaders Champion! Yeti Sports 1- Long Shot Version Champion! Pool Jam - 10 Minute Game Champion! Yeti Pentathlon Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Taylorsville, UT [stuck in the 20th century].
Posts: 5,829
Blog Entries: 4
Thanks: 25
Thanked 78 Times in 53 Posts
The_Heretic is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonesy View Post
Basically, Jews are Arabs who left the middle-east a couple thousand years ago. But because of religious in-breeding, they stuck together. The reason they do not look quite like Arabs is because it is ok for them to marry whoever, as long as the person converts to Judaism.
Actually most modern Israeli Jews are more European than anything. One of the reasons Palestinians resent losing land to immigrant Jews is because most of them have very little Semitic ethnicity left in them yet still claim that land they never set foot in much less saw is suddenly theirs by divine right. Someone walks into my house saying they've always owned it isn't going to get a warm welcome.
__________________

John McCain: "He's in Iraq... with a few centuries to kill."
The_Heretic is online now   Top Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2008, 10:51 AM   #8 (permalink)
Totally Conscienceless
 

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 639
My Mood:
Thanks: 20
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kblair7 is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Heretic View Post
Actually most modern Israeli Jews are more European than anything. One of the reasons Palestinians resent losing land to immigrant Jews is because most of them have very little Semitic ethnicity left in them yet still claim that land they never set foot in much less saw is suddenly theirs by divine right. Someone walks into my house saying they've always owned it isn't going to get a warm welcome.
You mean the difference between the ashkenaz Jews and the sephardic Jews?
kblair7 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


New To Site? Need Help?

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher