Xcaezarx

Thanks. I would like to do somthing about it. I will talk to a few friends and see what they think.

OldManOnFire

Well Einstein wannabe twit, your post talked about 'gay marriage' and I responded with a 'gay marriage' scenario. Now if you would have stated 'same-sex marriage', perhaps I would have given a different response.

Further, your post does not mention 'gay marriage' regarding the USA, so surely you're not so stupid to not know that 'same-sex marriage' is actually okay in The Netherlands, South Africa, Spain, Belgium, and I believe Canada, and in Ted Kennedy's Massachusetts.

Further, you ask about 'marriage' but you don't clarify if this includes 'civil unions' or 'domestic partnerships'? You mean marriage as defined by the religious community?? You mean marriage as defined by state and federal laws?? Do you have any idea what you mean?

Further you don't define 'gay' in terms of anatomical qualities. How about transsexuals in marriage? How about transgender in marriage?

"I may not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." Aren't you full of arrogant hypocritical BS?? Defending to the death my right to say something, at least in your book, also means get the hell off of my post. So say what I wish but don't say it in your space--total BS twit.

"Because most of them aren't worth reading." This explains part of your stupidity. If you have not read them, then how would you know they are not worth reading...duh??

"False. Gay marriage means male-male, or female-female marriage." So the example I provided you would call a 'heterosexual marriage'?? I'd say if two 'gay' people are married, then they have a 'gay' marriage. But remember twit...you did not indicate 'same-sex' marriage.

And for the final example of your arrogant stupidity is all of your anger and attacks towards me and you don't even know me. You are dealing with silly words on a political forum. Because of your immaturity and insecurities, you feel comfortable resorting to insults and bullying instead of a few words of dialogue. I don't even believe my comments were in response to things you said but you felt a need to jump in and act childish. My life is just fine thank you. If you believe you feel 'attacked' from a few simple words, then I suggest you spend a few minutes at the woodpile where I talk to you about your disrespect. I learned a long time ago to ignore cry-babies such as yourself. When you get to be 60/70 years old, perhaps then you might have earned something, but right now, if you are 19 years old, your behavior has lead me to believe you are nothing more than a spoiled, cry-baby twit.

I'd say we're even now so no sense in responding because I'm done with you. I may respond to others on this thread...but never again you...

__________________
Did you know both our problems and the solutions can be found simply by looking in our mirrors...and...Never confuse the extraordinary stuff I think and write with that of a well-balanced person...

Xcaezarx

Damn, I dont even know where to begin tearing this post apart. Lets start from the beginning shall we?

First off, when did I ever claim to be Einstein? If that was a veiled referance to the quote I made, you may want to look at your 5th grade history, cuz Einstein did not say that. It was Patrick Henry.

The definition of gay marriage is M/M or F/F marriage. A gay guy and a lesbian female are still M/F. No matter their sexual preferance, it is not gay marriage.

I was hoping that most people would pick up on the fact that it was for the U.S, since those other countries already support gay marriage. Why the hell would I, a gay marriage supporter, start a thread on gay marriage in Canada? It already exists. I have no problem with it there.

Marriage and civil unions are two seperate things. If you actually knew anything about what you were talking about, you might know that.

Transsexuals aren't anatomically altered. They are still males or females, they just identify with the opposite gender. As for transvestites (I can only assume you mean this by transgender) they are males who have become females or vice-versa. Still males or females. Nothing new there. Again, you bring in somthing that has no bearing on the current topic.

If you go back and read that post, I did not say you couldnt say those things. I just said that you were off topic with what this thread was on, and so I told you to get off the topic if you were going to continue with that line of thought.

Oh man, you cought me there. I guess you do have some intellect, since you caught my inflammatory remarks. Oh, wait, you made this long, angry post at me. I guess you arent as smart as you think you are huh?

You repeated yourself. AGAIN. Since it obviously takes two or three times for you to understand somthing, I'll explain this again, and I will try to use small words, so you will be sure to understand. The term "Gay" refers to a male who likes other males. The term gay marriage, therefore, refers to marriage in which the sexes of both parties are the same. The example you gave was one male and one female. If that isnt the definition of a heterosexual marriage, then what is? Go find someone against "same sex marriage" and ask them your question. I bet you they will say its fine with them, but continue to disagree with Gay marriage. Would that not prove my point? I thought so.

Insults and bullying? Isnt that what you just did in this post? I dont think I have ever insulted or bullied you at all. I have made forceful points, since that seems to be all you understand, and I have never insulted you, except maybe for calling you a moron, which is certainly understandable. Instead, in almost every post you have made on this thread, you have called someone a twit. And not just me. Several other people. and you say I am the one insulting and bullying people? I think you need to go look those words up in a dictionary as well.

I belive that calling people names, which you certainly seem to do alot, falls under the catagory of being childish. So who acts more childish you or me? I think we all know the answer to that one.

Um...what the hell is the "woodpile." I would suggest you explain things more carefully, as it sounds like you are asking me out, and I don't date morons. Sorry.

So you are saying that if I were 60 or 70, what I am saying would be ok, but since I am 19, it isn't ok? How does that make any sense at all?

And finally the part that has me the most excited of all, you say that you wont respond to anything. Does this mean you are leaving the post? That would be wonderful. I can only hope. Maybe then we can have an actual discussion, instead of having an old man "take me to the woodpile" for being "childish."