Munas

I am personally leaning towards Huckabee. I will state that I have issue with some of his ultra Christian views, but I honestly don't see how these would ever impact legislation in such a way to change the course of the nation.

What I do like about him is that he is not scared to give an answer, something that I am finding is difficult for most candidates, on both sides to do (barring Kucinich and Paul of course).

cheapseats

Edwards, no contest.

EvilMonkey

I am starting to lean more towards Obama.

Kana

As this thread is in the conservatives section, I'll take it to be referring to the Republican primaries. In that case, my vote would go for Ron Paul. On the Democratic side, it would go to Kucinich.

__________________
Groovyville

VKMHVM2

GOP: Ron Paul

Dems: Dennis Kucinich

__________________
It's All Here!

Dr. Albert Pastore: An Independent Investigation of 9-11 and the War on Terrorism

"Missing Links" - the 911 film THEY do NOT want you to see!

CosmicRocker

prolly Clinton - maybe Biden.
depends on the race.

the vote is on Jan. 29th here in Florida, so this year Florida does have a big say.
( even if we are stripped of delegates to the Dem. Convention )

__________________

Traveling Wilburys (l to r)

Bob Dylan, Jeff Lynne, Tom Petty, George Harrison, Roy Orbison

cheapseats

How could loss of delegates translate into having more say?

cheapseats

Obama put his noggin together with I Don't Remember Who to draft some dead-beat Dad legislation.

Bear in mind that this was lately, during this campaign season.

The usual Good Stuff about making people responsible and coercing a Family out of none...a magic trick the execution of which I have never witnessed, even at the Magic Castle.

But here's the kicker.

The Idealist Who Turned Into A Pander OR The Idealist Who Knows Diddly Squat About Economics And Less About The Mood Of The Working Class made a point of emphasizing that the tax dollars we spend tracking down these men and serving notice and collecting money and distributing money will NOT decrease certain of the mother's welfare benefits.

Is that our objective, then?

Initiate some more expensive-to-administer, feel-good legislation that ADDS to, rather than detracts from, the tax bill of Labor? See, I thought that was specifically NOT our objective.

Even if someone will tell me that he means to shift the tax burden to the rich, I'll say that's all fine and well BUT. The tax burden SHOULD be shifted to the rich. A child would understand this.

But the concept of taxation is NOT how much can we take but, rather, how much do we need? Why on earth should ANYONE, rich or working class, keep paying the same amount...just, here ya go, have some cash...to new "families," if the rightly responsible people are now kicking in on their responsibilities, AS THEY SHOULD?

Obama seems either to have sold out, or he's more optimistic than smart.

This really isn't the time for hope sans common sense.

gorillamom

Kusinich. If he's elected then we really have true representation with Ron Paul as his running mate. I usually split my ticket when voting in all elections depending on whay each canidate's voting record is. I'm just not thrilled with Ron Paul's attitude towards education.

__________________

The Clock of life is wound but once,
And no man has the power,
To tell just when the hands will stop
On what day or what hour.
Now is the only time we have,
So live it with a will,
Don't wait until tomorrow,
The hands may then be still.

TrueBlueAmerican

Barack Obama.