bornright

After speaking with a friend of my age group we got into the discussion of politics which usually occurs. I was shocked when he told me he hopes Obama wins in November. Both of us are full of experiences that would show this, with Obama's views, to be very damaging to our country. I questioned him to why would he want such a damaging thing to occur. His answer was that he felt that the people in this country was spoiled and that they needed to be educated with the hard times that Obama would bestow upon us. He was very confident that the working and energetic people would survive as they have in past destructive administrations. He felt that the hard times that an Obama administration would bring to this country would, if we survived, force the spoiled Americans to maturity.

My friend may be right about the "me generation" that we older Americans have created for our youth. Perhaps we do need tough love for the youth of today in politics. We have become a nation that the youth choose to vote for a "fad" rather than the future of this country. Perhaps if we can survive an Obama administration we could become a nation that would vote for candidates that would strengthen the country and provide opportunity for those that have the energy level to achieve.

bornright

This is from an article I read a couple of months ago.

Rose and Milton Friedman Senior Fellow
The Hoover Institution
Stanford University
Stanford , California 94305

Thomas Sowell


Many years ago, a great hitter named Paul Waner was nearing the end of his long career. He entered a ballgame with 2,999 hits -- one hit away from the landmark total of 3,000, which so many hitters want to reach, but which rel atively few actually do reach.

Waner hit a ball that the fielder did not handle cleanly but the official scorer called it a hit, making it Waner's 3,000th. Paul Waner then sent word to the official scorer that he did not want that questionable hit to be the one that put him over the top.

The official scorer reversed himself and called it an error. Later Paul Waner got a clean hit for number 3,000.

What reminded me of this is the great fervor that many seem to feel over the prospect of the first black President of the United States .

No doubt it is only a matter of time before there is a black president, just as it was only a matter of time before Paul Waner got his 3,000th hit. The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark is reached.

Paul Waner had too much pride to accept a scratch hit. Choosing a President of the United States is a lot more momentous than a baseball re cord. We the voters need to have far more concern about who we put in that office that holds the destiny of a nation and of generations yet unborn.

There is no reason why someone as arrogant, foolishly clever and ultimately dangerous as Barack Obama should become president -- especially not at a time when the threat of international terrorists with nuclear weapons looms over 300 million Americans.

Many people seem to regard elections as occasions for venting emotions, like cheering for your favorite team or choosing a Homecoming Queen.

The three leading candidates for their party's nomination are being discussed in terms of their demographics -- race, sex and age -- as if that is what the job is about.

One of the painful aspects of studying great catastrophes of the past is discovering how many times people were preoccupied with trivialities when they were teetering on the edge of doom. The demographics of the presidency are far less important than the momentous weight of responsibility that office carries.

Just the power to nominate federal judges to trial courts and appellate courts across the country, including the Supreme Court, can have an enormous impact for decades to come. There is no point feeling outraged by things done by federal judges, if you vote on the basis of emotion for those who appoint them.

Barack Obama has already indicated that he wants judges who make social policy instead of just applying the law. He has already tried to stop young violent criminals from being tried as adults.

Although Senator Obama has presented himself as the candidate of new things -- using the mantra of "change" endlessly -- the cold fact is that virtually everything he says about domestic policy is straight out of the 1960s and virtually everything he says about foreign policy is straight out of the 1930s.

Protecting criminals, attacking business, increasing government spending, promoting a sense of envy and grievance, raising taxes on people who are productive and subsidizing those who are not -- all this is a re-run of the 1960s.

We paid a terrible price for such 1960s notions in the years that followed, in the form of soaring crime rates, double-digit inflation and double-digit unemployment. During the 1960s, ghettoes across the countries were ravaged by riots from which many have not fully recovered to this day.

The violence and destruction were concentrated not where there was the greatest poverty or injustice but where there were the most liberal politicians, promoting grievances and hamstringing the police.

Internationally, the approach that Senator Obama proposes -- including the media magic of meetings between heads of state -- was tried during the 1930s. That approach, in the name of peace, is what led to the most catastrophic war in human history.

Everything seems new to those too young to remember the old and too ignorant of history to have heard about it.


Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institute and author of Basic Economics: A Citizen's Guide to the Economy.

HarperLee

Let me guess -- the "working and energetic people" would be white,
right?

__________________
Oliver Stone on George W. Bush: "the banality of evil"

http://www.nationalpriorities.org/costofwar_home

Mithrall

You do realize that Obama becoming President after 8 years of the Bush Presiduncy©, which they will compare and contrast, means that the Republicans wont see the presidency for at least a couple of generations don't you?

W.M.DEEEZ

Have you decided to completely throw proper grammar to the wind?

__________________
Don't it always seem to go, that you don't know what you've got til it's gone

Vicariously I

Bornright doesn't REALIZE anything. Not even the fact that he's a racist ass with the IQ of my end table.

__________________
"It's hard to face reality when you're busy living in the American Dream."

Vicariously I

DanS.

I think it's so cute when old people whine about the younger generations. I wonder if it's something in our genes? It seems that every generation thinks that they were better than the ones that followed them....yet we still keep progressing as a species and a country......

When you're done with this rant here BR, maybe you can tell us how you walked up hill both ways in 5ft of snow just to get to school....

Cookie

Nice kids. Why don't you try addressing the points brought up by Dr. Sowell and lay off the personal attacks against Bornright?

__________________
Corgi butts drive me nuts.

DanS.

Hey I addressed the OP....the OP that attacked my generation and people like me. I haven't even read Sowell's article....and nor do I care to really.

DanS.

okay read it...there is no substance in the article...just inuendo.....it's crap just like the OP.