![]() |
|
Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! |
|
|||||||
| Share PG | Forum | Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Mark Forums Read |
| Sponsors |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oregon
Posts: 6,428
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 71
Thanked 455 Times in 278 Posts
![]() ![]() |
Analysis: Obama has advantage in head-to-head with McCain
Title
Analysis: Obama has advantage in head-to-head with McCain Link Analysis: Obama has advantage in head-to-head with McCain - CNN.com ----------------------------------------------------- Excerpt ![]() * Story Highlights * Polls suggest Sens. Hillary Clinton and John McCain would be tied * Sen. Barack Obama would have a clear lead over McCain, polls suggest * Men would be more likely to vote for Obama than Clinton in a general election From Bill Schneider CNN Washington Bureau WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sen. John McCain became the likely Republican nominee after Mitt Romney decided to suspend his campaign Thursday. Now, the Democrats are debating who would do better against the Arizona Republican. Two polls this month have asked registered voters nationwide how they would vote if the choice were between McCain and Democratic Sen. Hillary Clinton. A CNN poll, conducted by the Opinion Research Corporation February 1-3, shows Clinton three points ahead of McCain, 50 percent to 47 percent. That's within the poll's margin of error of 3 percentage points, meaning that the race is statistically tied.. A Time magazine poll, conducted February 1-4, also shows a dead heat between Clinton and McCain. Each was backed by 46 percent of those polled. Sen. Barack Obama believes he can do better, arguing "I've got appeal that goes beyond our party." In the CNN poll, Obama leads McCain by 8 points, 52 percent to 44 percent. That's outside the margin of error, meaning that Obama has the lead. And in the Time poll, Obama leads McCain by 7 points, 48 percent to 41 percent -- a lead also outside of the poll's margin of error of 3 percentage points. In both polls, Obama looks stronger than Clinton. Why? Obama's explanation: "I think there is no doubt that she has higher negatives than any of the remaining Democratic candidates. That's just a fact, and there are some who will not vote for her." That was three weeks ago. Now, only two Democratic candidates remain. Clinton does have higher negatives than Obama -- and McCain. Forty-four percent of the public say they don't like Clinton, compared with 36 percent who don't like McCain and 31 percent who don't like Obama, according to the CNN poll conducted February 1-3. Why does Obama do better against McCain than Clinton? Obama does do a little better than Clinton with independents and Republicans. But the big difference is men: Men give McCain an 18-point lead over Clinton, 57 percent to 39 percent, according to the CNN poll. The margin of error for that question was plus or minus 5 percentage points. But if McCain and Obama went head to head, McCain's lead among men shrinks to three, 49 percent to 46 percent -- statistically a tie. Women, on the other hand, vote for either Clinton or Obama by similar margins. Some Democrats may be worried about how Obama will fare with white voters. Whites give McCain a 15-point lead over Clinton, (56 percent for McCain, 41 percent for Clinton). But Obama actually fares better than Clinton with white voters. McCain still leads, but by a smaller margin, (52 to 43 percent). Obama argues that he can reach across party lines. And he does do a little better than Clinton with Independents and Republicans, at least in these polls. But the big difference is that Clinton doesn't draw very well with men. Obama does. ------------------------------------------------------ Comment: ^ How McCain will destroy the Clinton's
__________________
Barack Obama - Get the facts at BarackObamaWatch.com |
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
The party of the pissed!!
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,504
My Mood:
Thanks: 183
Thanked 119 Times in 92 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
She has earned this............... How can the american ppl deny her this after all she has done for them.. ![]() She is ready to go day one. Her heart is bigger........ It aint about her wanting to be preisdent it is about what she can do for us........ She is in this fight for us............ . She said so..........![]()
__________________
Preventive war is not war!!!!Counter-terror is not terror |
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
punk nun
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 53 miles west of venus
Posts: 4,023
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 227
Thanked 771 Times in 464 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
not only does SHE feel it's her turn and that's she's entitled, a lot of her supporters seem to think the same way, despite the fact that the polls and most experts acknowledge that she is the weaker of the two candidates. maybe today's primaries, and the ones to come in the next couple of weeks, will help clarify who the majority of voters think is the better, stronger, candidate. i sure hope so, because this election is too important to hand to someone just because it's "her turn".
__________________
"NEVER underestimate the Democrat's ability to snatch DEFEAT from the jaws of victory." |
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Totally Conscienceless
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 639
My Mood:
Thanks: 20
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
The party of the pissed!!
![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,504
My Mood:
Thanks: 183
Thanked 119 Times in 92 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
![]() Momentum seems to be in favor of Obama.......... Will she bow out or fight to the last dirtied & dying democrat???? I could see him doing it.......... To be honest I can not visualize her taking the higher ground here..... Or anywhere........
__________________
Preventive war is not war!!!!Counter-terror is not terror |
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Snarky Maverick Liar
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Dallas/Ft. Worth
Posts: 3,806
My Mood:
Thanks: 75
Thanked 96 Times in 73 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
For all those brainiacs that got themselves an ARM, I suggest an APT.! |
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Chairman of the Bored
![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,187
My Mood:
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
![]() |
Anybody can beat McCain. The press is just telling you he's viable because they like to talk to insane people and they can always get a half crazed statement from McCain.
After Obama beats him what will he do? He doesn't know how to get anything done. He's Robert Redford in The Candidate. "What do we do now?"
__________________
"Last words are for fools who haven't said enough." Karl Marx (last words) |
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
punk nun
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 53 miles west of venus
Posts: 4,023
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 227
Thanked 771 Times in 464 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
__________________
"NEVER underestimate the Democrat's ability to snatch DEFEAT from the jaws of victory." |
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
punk nun
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 53 miles west of venus
Posts: 4,023
My Mood:
Blog Entries: 3
Thanks: 227
Thanked 771 Times in 464 Posts
![]() |
Quote:
![]() those remarks are so idiotic that they barely dignify a response!
__________________
"NEVER underestimate the Democrat's ability to snatch DEFEAT from the jaws of victory." |
|
|
|
Top
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Administrator
![]() ![]() Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,332
My Mood:
Thanks: 98
Thanked 177 Times in 131 Posts
![]() ![]() |
Clinton has done better in solid liberal states...states that will go for a dem no matter who the candidate is. Obama has done better in states that would b considered "battle ground" states....meaning he would have a better chance of picking up not only the solid liberal states(like Cali) and then also picking up the tougher states as well.
|
|
|
Top
|
![]() |
| Sponsors |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|