PoliticalGroove Forums

Welcome to the PoliticalGroove Forums

We offer discussion, social groups and blogs in an open and free environment. Our free community you will have access to post topics, post blogs, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!



Go Back   PoliticalGroove Forums > Issue Forums > In The News
Share PG Forum Register Blogs FAQ Members List Social Groups Mark Forums Read

Sponsors
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-15-2008, 11:29 AM   #11 (permalink)
Fiscal Conservative
 
Cookie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: God's country
Posts: 1,712
My Mood:
Thanks: 121
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Cookie is a famous PG member
Good for them. If two people love one another enough to commit by marriage, more power to them. I've always been a fan of love, wherever and with whomever we can find it.
__________________
Corgi butts drive me nuts.
Cookie is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 11:32 AM   #12 (permalink)
Fiscal Conservative
 
Cookie's Avatar
 

Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: God's country
Posts: 1,712
My Mood:
Thanks: 121
Thanked 20 Times in 17 Posts
Cookie is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius View Post
Thank you for asking that important question.

The issue before the courts and the people is not whether to allow marriage to be redefined or to allow even "Other" groups to be recognized to wed. The issue is can same sex partners like my self and my partner of 20 years who have lived in home we made in the middle of average America be kept from marrying.

The decision to overturn Ca. ban is about that ban and that situation and does not effect any other Illegal activity. Multiple Marriage is Illegal and you can go to jail for it. Gay marriage NEVER WAS illegal. It was just not recognised. Not an illegal activity, and no other difference other than same sex. Equal protection. This is my opinion and not the courts....but it is their decision and I am proud of the work of all gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgendered Lawyers and activists that made it happen.

This ruling paves the way to overturning DOMA.
will you and your spouse marry formally now? (I hope I asked this in the right way)
__________________
Corgi butts drive me nuts.
Cookie is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 12:56 PM   #13 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
anhailla's Avatar
 

Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: iowa
Posts: 4,546
Thanks: 187
Thanked 116 Times in 87 Posts
anhailla is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookie View Post
Good for them. If two people love one another enough to commit by marriage, more power to them. I've always been a fan of love, wherever and with whomever we can find it.
..nice post

__________________
...either I go, or that wallpaper does.

Oscar Wilde
anhailla is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 01:02 PM   #14 (permalink)
Dr. Zaius, Mark M.
 
MarkMiller's Avatar
 
Archery 2000 Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,317
Thanks: 72
Thanked 47 Times in 37 Posts
MarkMiller is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cookie View Post
will you and your spouse marry formally now? (I hope I asked this in the right way)
Not right away. We had made plans to do it years ago anyway but since it wasn't recognized didn't see a need. Now 15 years later I can wait and let everyone one else go first I don't need national attention at a private moment like that and for a while at least it will be difficult to do very privately.
MarkMiller is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 01:05 PM   #15 (permalink)
Dr. Zaius, Mark M.
 
MarkMiller's Avatar
 
Archery 2000 Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,317
Thanks: 72
Thanked 47 Times in 37 Posts
MarkMiller is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by guest1234567 View Post
But why is multiple marriage a crime? It is strictly because of Christian "values" that were forced upon everyone. And let's not be coy, sodomy laws in many states made gay marriage a crime for a long, long time. Thankfully, we are getting past this, but I do think that there is absolutely no reason to classify multi-marriage as a crime.
No...I disagree. There are more humane rights values at stake by not forcing a minor to do anything against their will. Multiple marriages result in many forms of abuse in children.
MarkMiller is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 01:07 PM   #16 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
guest1234567's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,820
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
guest1234567 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius View Post
No...I disagree. There are more humane rights values at stake by not forcing a minor to do anything against their will. Multiple marriages result in many forms of abuse in children.
But that I think this makes my point. If the system of marriage was formalized, then these children would not be living on hidden compounds. They could go to school with the rest of the kids in a normal neighborhood. And of course, I specifically mentioned that the kids would be protected from sex abuse and marriages to minors.
guest1234567 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 01:09 PM   #17 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
guest1234567's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,820
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
guest1234567 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius View Post
Not right away. We had made plans to do it years ago anyway but since it wasn't recognized didn't see a need. Now 15 years later I can wait and let everyone one else go first I don't need national attention at a private moment like that and for a while at least it will be difficult to do very privately.
And BTW Z, I am very glad you will have the opportunity to marry. Despite the other topic I'm blathering about, I still wish you and yours the best of futures.
guest1234567 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 01:32 PM   #18 (permalink)
Dr. Zaius, Mark M.
 
MarkMiller's Avatar
 
Archery 2000 Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,317
Thanks: 72
Thanked 47 Times in 37 Posts
MarkMiller is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by guest1234567 View Post
And BTW Z, I am very glad you will have the opportunity to marry. Despite the other topic I'm blathering about, I still wish you and yours the best of futures.
Oh...I didn't really doubt it. I was taking advantage of you asking the questions to discuss the issues and try to answer any that I thought I could.
MarkMiller is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 01:35 PM   #19 (permalink)
Dr. Zaius, Mark M.
 
MarkMiller's Avatar
 
Archery 2000 Champion!
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,317
Thanks: 72
Thanked 47 Times in 37 Posts
MarkMiller is a famous PG member
Quote:
Originally Posted by guest1234567 View Post
But that I think this makes my point. If the system of marriage was formalized, then these children would not be living on hidden compounds. They could go to school with the rest of the kids in a normal neighborhood. And of course, I specifically mentioned that the kids would be protected from sex abuse and marriages to minors.
Living openly doesn't stop weddings between an adult male and several undergaged females. Which has been a large part of current investigations.

Plus I guess the bigger argument would be....why several Wives? It subjigates the female and only the female.
MarkMiller is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Old 05-15-2008, 01:49 PM   #20 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
guest1234567's Avatar
 

Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,820
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
guest1234567 has disabled reputation
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Zaius View Post
Living openly doesn't stop weddings between an adult male and several undergaged females. Which has been a large part of current investigations.
Indeed, but they were all living in seclusion. But they have no choice either. They must live in secret. The children were not being protected by the law or neighbors that were not part of the cult.

Quote:

Plus I guess the bigger argument would be....why several Wives. It subjugates the female and only the female.
You've been on HBO boards, maybe you've been to the Big Love boards. There were many people who joined up to talk about their own poly-relationships. There are people who feel they have enough love for more than one person, and that they in turn need more love than one person can provide.

It's definitely not for me, but who am I to say who can't marry.

As long as they live within the rules of civilized society. And these rules should also be doing more to protect the battered wives and children in mono-relationships too.
guest1234567 is offline   Top Reply With Quote
Reply

Sponsors

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC8
PoliticalGroove.com is in no way affiliated with Viacom - The Daily Show with Jon Stewart or HBO - Real Time with Bill Maher