You Can't Take Christ Out Of Christmas - Page 9

Environment Man · 12-23-2007, 05:33 PM

Let's get ready for football. later.

Titanium Cat · 12-23-2007, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Environment Man

Well to them the tree with 30 rings that God created 30 seconds ago is 30 seconds old but would be 30 years old to you.

Because they are idiots.

Titanium Cat · 12-23-2007, 05:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Environment Man

Einstein was so 20th Century.

And you are so Dark Ages.

LeisureChrist · 12-23-2007, 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Environment Man

It was a valid equation. I note that you cannot provide better. Just remember that I am the talent and you are the paparazzi.

You yourself referred to it as useless.

Environment Man · 12-23-2007, 09:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LeisureChrist

You yourself referred to it as useless.

Me myself qualified the brilliant formula with the caveat that it is useless because of the physics of electron location and velocity.

GurnBlanston · 12-23-2007, 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Environment Man

Yet Einstein did NOT include God in his equations. That was a cute phrase he came up with for public relations though.

He's flat out stated he believes in a God.

Environment Man · 12-23-2007, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GurnBlanston

He's flat out stated he believes in a God.

Yet he did not include it in his work. That is my point. And it was not enthusiasm for God but a grudging admission that 'well there probably is a god.'

GurnBlanston · 12-23-2007, 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Environment Man

Yet he did not include it in his work. That is my point. And it was not enthusiasm for God but a grudging admission that 'well there probably is a god.'

What the Hell does that even mean? "He didn't include God in his work..." That's nonsense. He attempted to unravel a mystery that he admitted was a work of God. I love this "all or nothing" attitude from the overly "faithed".
Who says Evolution isn't Gods mechanism of Creation. Who says God doesn't use natural systems that we later study and label ourselves. Isn't that exploring the mysteries of God as well.
Ever since Francis Bacon established the philosophy of Impericism in Science have scientist been able to study and catalog these subjects according to our understanding of it without the threat of implied outcome which is exactly what the overly "faithed" want. We are able to establish such studies as Physics, Biology, Astronomy, etc in and of themselves imperically.
Einstein believed that theire was some sort of "Designer" or "Architect" for the Universe and he explored it deeper than most but, he explored it none the less. He personally unraveled some of God's mysteries.

Environment Man · 12-23-2007, 09:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GurnBlanston

What the Hell does that even mean? "He didn't include God in his work..." That's nonsense. He attempted to unravel a mystery that he admitted was a work of God. I love this "all or nothing" attitude from the overly "faithed".
Who says Evolution isn't Gods mechanism of Creation. Who says God doesn't use natural systems that we later study and label ourselves. Isn't that exploring the mysteries of God as well.
Ever since Francis Bacon established the philosophy of Impericism in Science have scientist been able to study and catalog these subjects according to our understanding of it without the threat of implied outcome which is exactly what the overly "faithed" want. We are able to establish such studies as Physics, Biology, Astronomy, etc in and of themselves imperically.
Einstein believed that theire was some sort of "Designer" or "Architect" for the Universe and he explored it deeper than most but, he explored it none the less. He personally unraveled some of God's mysteries.

Relax man. Your Deism is showing. You simply seek to reject God as you always have. You simply want God to put it in motion and then disappear. It does not work that way. Maybe Einstein should have been more 'faithed' and he would not have hit a brick wall in his quest for a Unified Field Theory. My point again is that if he had allowed God into his work he would have been better at what he did. Even I, a nonphysicist, have deduced a Unified Field Theory, that achieves what Einstein could not because of his rejection of God in his work. He would have been hugely successful if he had acknowledged God in his work instead of merely mentioning his belief in a designer. He had no choice. All the evidence is there for God and only a fool ignores. Hawking made the same mistake as Einstein and has ended up also frustrated in not being able to find a Unified Field Theory. And one never can if God is excluded.

Titanium Cat · 12-23-2007, 10:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Environment Man

Relax man. Your Deism is showing. You simply seek to reject God as you always have. You simply want God to put it in motion and then disappear. It does not work that way. Maybe Einstein should have been more 'faithed' and he would not have hit a brick wall in his quest for a Unified Field Theory. My point again is that if he had allowed God into his work he would have been better at what he did. Even I, a nonphysicist, have deduced a Unified Field Theory, that achieves what Einstein could not because of his rejection of God in his work. He would have been hugely successful if he had acknowledged God in his work instead of merely mentioning his belief in a designer. He had no choice. All the evidence is there for God and only a fool ignores. Hawking made the same mistake as Einstein and has ended up also frustrated in not being able to find a Unified Field Theory. And one never can if God is excluded.

Once again E-man takes idiotic posting to a new height.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode