+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Two cheers for America

  1. #1
    Administrator DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,441
    Thanks
    1,128
    Thanked 2,661 Times in 1,792 Posts

    Two cheers for America

    Jul 2nd 2009
    From The Economist print edition

    The current Lexington bids farewell to America after 13 years


    Illustration by David Simonds

    ALEXIS DE TOCQUEVILLE was so enthralled by the nine months he spent in the United States in 1831 that he wrote two fat volumes about the country. He admired the vigour of its democratic institutions and the entrepreneurial spirit of its people, which was rapidly transforming a vast wilderness into a polished civilisation. And he approved of the way that the country’s potential vices were moderated by its commonplace virtues, particularly its civic pride and religious observance. The proud French aristocrat was happy to call himself “half Yankee”.

    But in the 1840s and 1850s de Tocqueville’s views on America took a darker turn, as a new collection of his writings makes clear. (“Tocqueville on America After 1840: Letters and Other Writings”). Public life was dominated by people who lacked “moderation, sometimes probity, above all education”. America’s sense of “exaggerated pride in its strength” was promoting military adventurism. “Primitivism” stalked the land. “What is certain is that, for some years, you have strangely abused the advantages given to you by God,” he chided.

    It is presumptuous to mention oneself alongside the author of the greatest book written about America. But during the 13 years that the author of this column has spent in the United States, he too has found his initial exuberance clouded by darker thoughts. When he arrived in 1996, America was lord of all it surveyed, the world’s only remaining superpower, convinced of its supreme benevolence, and the engine of a productivity miracle that left Europeans in awe. Social pathologies such as violent crime were being brought under control; almost half of households owned shares. The place had an air of what Mark Twain once called “the serene confidence which a Christian feels in four aces”.

    Today, this serene confidence has long gone. Americans are more pessimistic than the Indians or Chinese, worried that their children will not enjoy the opportunities that they have taken for granted. Xenophobia is on the rise, as is nostalgia for a time of stable families and solid values. California, the state that has always reached the future first, is preparing to pay its bills with IOUs.

    America has had an inauspicious start to the 21st century, to put it mildly. The Iraq war revealed the fragility of the “unipolar moment”. America sullied not just its moral authority, thanks to Abu Ghraib and “enhanced interrogation”, but also its reputation for competence, thanks to faulty intelligence about WMD and a botched occupation. The economic crisis has revealed the fragility of its financial system. Great investment banks have crumbled to dust. Financial wizards have been exposed as frauds or fools. A country that once lectured the world on the “Washington consensus” of deregulation and privatisation is busy re-regulating Wall Street and nationalising Detroit.

    America has got ever deeper into debt, unable to kick the habit of living beyond its means. The cost of entitlements has been rising vertiginously, and will do so even faster as the baby-boomers retire. The federal deficit is likely to average a trillion dollars a year over the next decade. Sober projections suggest that by 2027, if federal revenues remain at around 18% of GDP—the level people are accustomed to—they will not even cover the cost of government-run health programmes, Social Security and debt interest. Everything else will require more borrowing. Foreigners, who currently hold around half of US Treasury debt, up from 18% in 1990, will not finance Uncle Sam’s self-indulgence for ever.

    But we should guard against substituting irrational pessimism for irrational exuberance. Yes, America will face competition from developing countries and from an enlarging and deepening European Union. But it brings great resources to the fight. China’s authoritarian regime is brittle. About 40% of India’s people are illiterate, and its pool of trained talent is limited. America will be spared the demographic disasters awaiting Europe and China, thanks to its high birth rate and genius for absorbing newcomers.

    A genius for self-correction
    De Tocqueville, in his optimistic phase, said that “the greatness of America lies not in being more enlightened than any other nation, but rather in her ability to repair her faults.” America has succeeded brilliantly in repairing the ancestral fault of racism. Thirty-six years after Richard Nixon casually remarked that “there are times when an abortion is necessary…when you have a black and a white,” America elected the child of a black father and a white mother to the presidency. The new administration is trying to correct some of the excesses of the Bush years, much as Ronald Reagan corrected the excesses of the Carter years. Barack Obama wants to tackle health-care costs and rebuild the economy on the rock of solid education and a sound infrastructure rather than the sands of financial speculation.

    Whether Mr Obama can deliver on his promises is open to doubt: his inspiring rhetoric is marred by a willingness to compromise with his party’s free-spending establishment in Congress. But there is fortunately a more solid reason for optimism. That is the country’s taste for entrepreneurial capitalism, a taste that arrived with the first settlers and is becoming an ever greater resource, as the global economy is shaken by wave upon wave of disruptive technologies. America still has a genius for incubating entrepreneurs and giving those entrepreneurs the wherewithal to turn bright ideas into global behemoths. America’s biggest company, Wal-Mart, was founded only in 1962; its sexiest, Google, was conceived in a Californian dorm room at about the time that your columnist arrived on these shores. Even as de Tocqueville despaired about the future of his half-adopted country in the 1840s and 1850s, the likes of Carnegie and Rockefeller were about to unleash the greatest productivity miracle the world has seen. That is the America that still promises much.

    Lexington: Two cheers for America | The Economist
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to DanS. For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    Member GPLeonard is a famous PG member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 15 Times in 11 Posts

    Good old "Economist": Half snark, half shark

    Just listen to their glowing recital of America's Robber Baron history.

    Thank you E-Con-omist for the expected howler about "[Obama's] willingness to compromise with his party’s free-spending establishment in Congress."

    Yeah, sure-sure, the DimOldCrots are the sole free spenders. I guess Transatlantic communications were inoperative during the Reagan and Bush administrations, Tom Delay's K-Street Carnival, and five decades of bipartisan profligacy in military spending.

    Sometimes the Economist hits the nail on the head -- though it's often a glancing blow -- but the rest of the time they just swing the hammer wildly.
    "It is curious that physical courage should be so common in the world and moral courage so rare" Twain
    "It is the duty of every citizen according to his best capacities to give validity to his convictions in political affairs" Einstein
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to GPLeonard For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Administrator DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,441
    Thanks
    1,128
    Thanked 2,661 Times in 1,792 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by GPLeonard View Post
    Just listen to their glowing recital of America's Robber Baron history.

    Thank you E-Con-omist for the expected howler about "[Obama's] willingness to compromise with his party’s free-spending establishment in Congress."

    Yeah, sure-sure, the DimOldCrots are the sole free spenders. I guess Transatlantic communications were inoperative during the Reagan and Bush administrations, Tom Delay's K-Street Carnival, and five decades of bipartisan profligacy in military spending.

    Sometimes the Economist hits the nail on the head -- though it's often a glancing blow -- but the rest of the time they just swing the hammer wildly.


    ugh...that was't the point of that statement and you know it.
    Hell that wasn't even the point of the article. Moreover the article is an editorial, not representative of the publication as a whole. Also it is that writer's last article for them.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  6. #4
    Homicide:Who was Dilawar? BillCosby has disabled reputation BillCosby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    8,586
    Thanks
    1,272
    Thanked 1,413 Times in 1,012 Posts
    America has got ever deeper into debt, unable to kick the habit of living beyond its means. The cost of entitlements has been rising vertiginously,
    As GPLeonard pointed out. Military spending???

    America will be spared the demographic disasters awaiting Europe and China, thanks to its high birth rate and genius for absorbing newcomers.
    ??? How is the birth rate & newcomers going to spare us???


    We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. Howard Zinn
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  7. #5
    Administrator DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,441
    Thanks
    1,128
    Thanked 2,661 Times in 1,792 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BillCosby View Post
    As GPLeonard pointed out. Military spending???



    ??? How is the birth rate & newcomers going to spare us???
    Well because for programs like SS or even pensions in general to work there has to be more people paying into it than receiving the benefits from.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  8. #6
    Homicide:Who was Dilawar? BillCosby has disabled reputation BillCosby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    8,586
    Thanks
    1,272
    Thanked 1,413 Times in 1,012 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DanS. View Post
    Well because for programs like SS or even pensions in general to work there has to be more people paying into it than receiving the benefits from.
    True & that is what I was thinking. But on the other hand many of these ppl coming in are going to need services as well......

    The way it works is ppl(legal) can bring in their families (extended) & they are not necessarily skilled or contributing........

    The illegals may not be contributing to the tax or ss base....

    Legal vs illegal????


    We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. Howard Zinn
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  9. #7
    Administrator DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,441
    Thanks
    1,128
    Thanked 2,661 Times in 1,792 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BillCosby View Post
    True & that is what I was thinking. But on the other hand many of these ppl coming in are going to need services as well......

    The way it works is ppl(legal) can bring in their families (extended) & they are not necessarily skilled or contributing........

    The illegals may not be contributing to the tax or ss base....

    Legal vs illegal????
    Well legal definitely....and no I don't think that you can just bring in your extended family and have them receive SS(if they can not much) without first contributing to the pool.

    I started a thread somewhere here about people protectionism that at least sort of goes hand in hand with this topic.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  10. #8
    Administrator DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,441
    Thanks
    1,128
    Thanked 2,661 Times in 1,792 Posts
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  11. #9
    Homicide:Who was Dilawar? BillCosby has disabled reputation BillCosby's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    8,586
    Thanks
    1,272
    Thanked 1,413 Times in 1,012 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by DanS. View Post
    Well legal definitely....and no I don't think that you can just bring in your extended family and have them receive SS(if they can not much) without first contributing to the pool.

    I started a thread somewhere here about people protectionism that at least sort of goes hand in hand with this topic.
    Not sure they can ss but they can get welfare..........

    I have a friend originally from Hong Kong... They brought over the 80 year old gramma & she gets food stamps. Not sure what else..

    He makes good money....... & SO does his wife..... She is living w/ them...

    I think some of these problems (legal/illegal) are going to dampen if not destroy some of that upside.....

    & right now we already have a lot of ppl out of work....... Until things get better bringing in more ppl to save us does not seem practical...


    We judge ourselves by our ideals; others by their actions. Howard Zinn
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

  12. #10
    Administrator DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS. is gayer than a 3 dollar bill DanS.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    14,441
    Thanks
    1,128
    Thanked 2,661 Times in 1,792 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BillCosby View Post
    Not sure they can ss but they can get welfare..........

    I have a friend originally from Hong Kong... They brought over the 80 year old gramma & she gets food stamps. Not sure what else..

    He makes good money....... & SO does his wife..... She is living w/ them...

    I think some of these problems (legal/illegal) are going to dampen if not destroy some of that upside.....

    & right now we already have a lot of ppl out of work....... Until things get better bringing in more ppl to save us does not seem practical...
    It is trick for sure, which is why I thought the other thread was pretty important.

    IMO it isn't a black and white times are bad keep them out times are good let them in decision.

    Granted it doesn't make sense to bring in unskilled labor at this time. However it does make sense to bring in other people. For instance we could gain from bringing in more doctors and engineers. Two jobs that the laid off factory worker is not going to find himself applying for. Bringing in additional doctors has the added benefit of increasing the labor pool and bringing down the cost of health care....which in turn has effects on other areas of the economy.

    Also, historically many of our entrepreneurs have been immigrants...how many immigrants is it worth bringing in just to have say one Anheuser among them?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote   Top Share with Facebook

+ Reply to Thread

Visitors found this page by searching for:

Nobody landed on this page from a search engine, yet!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
PoliticalGroove News, Discussion, Blogs and more